Best for
- Use when a PERSONAL brand needs long-form WRITTEN content that builds authority rather than sells — LinkedIn posts, X threads, Substack and Medium essays, using PAS-Insight for founders, Story-Lesson-CTA for coaches, an…
minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/modules/personal-branding/en/26-thought-leadership-content-global/SKILL.md
Use when a PERSONAL brand needs long-form WRITTEN content that builds authority rather than sells — LinkedIn posts, X threads, Substack and Medium essays, using PAS-Insight for founders, Story-Lesson-CTA for coaches, and Hook-List-Reveal for creators, with six hook formulas and a 1-to-5 repurpose. Trigger on 'LinkedIn post', 'thought leadership', 'write a Twitter thread', 'newsletter essay', 'Substack post', 'I want to be known for this topic'. Also use when the user has an opinion and wants it
Decision brief
Long-form text to earn trust and build authority — DIFFERENT from sales ad copy (skill 05). This skill doesn't sell directly; it builds your position as an expert through valuable content.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills --skill "modules/personal-branding/en/26-thought-leadership-content-global"Inspect the Agent Skill "26-thought-leadership-content-global" from https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills/blob/958bd43b03afbc5afc42dfdb3fb2c087b23309e4/modules/personal-branding/en/26-thought-leadership-content-global/SKILL.md at commit 958bd43b03afbc5afc42dfdb3fb2c087b23309e4. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “Workflow” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Long-form = posts 500 words (LinkedIn, Twitter/X threads, Substack, Medium) with structure that walks the reader through your thinking from A to Z. Different from short-form (caption <100 words) and ad copy (125-character hook + CTA).
Long-form = posts 500 words (LinkedIn, Twitter/X threads, Substack, Medium) with structure that walks the reader through your thinking from A to Z. Different from short-form (caption <100 words) and ad copy (125-character hook + CTA).
Review the “Difference vs the other two formats” section in the pinned source before continuing.
1. After awareness phase — once you have 500-1,000 quality followers 2. To position as expert — not just a seller, but a teacher 3. Have real experience — failures, large projects, team management 4. Have time — 30-60 min per post, careful editing 5. Clear audience persona — kno…
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 93/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 553 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Long-form text to earn trust and build authority — DIFFERENT from sales ad copy (skill 05). This skill doesn't sell directly; it builds your position as an expert through valuable content.
Long-form = posts >500 words (LinkedIn, Twitter/X threads, Substack, Medium) with structure that walks the reader through your thinking from A to Z. Different from short-form (caption <100 words) and ad copy (125-character hook + CTA).
| Criterion | Short-form (caption) | Ad copy (skill 05) | Long-form (skill 26) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goal | Quick engagement | Direct conversion, low CPM | Build authority, earn trust |
| Length | <100 words | 125-500 chars | 500-3,000 words |
| CTA | Comment / Like | DM / Buy now | Soft CTA or none |
| Frequency | 5-7/week | Per ad budget | 2-3/week |
| Audience | Cold + warm | Targeted ads | Organic followers |
| Success metric | Reach, likes | ROAS, CPA | Saves, shares, DMs, in-depth comments |
Ask up to 4 questions before writing:
Formula: Problem -> Agitate -> Solve + Industry Insight
Different from standard PAS (skill 05): adds an Insight layer at the end — elevates from personal anecdote to industry-level wisdom. Founders use this to share operating lessons without selling directly.
When to use: strategic thinking, lessons from running the company, industry forecasts.
Full example (200 words):
I just let go of an employee after 6 months. Not for low performance.
She did the work. Hit deadlines. Clients praised her. But she never asked "why".
6 months. 4 large projects I assigned. 4 outputs that met "requirements" but missed the "objective". When I explained, she fixed it. Next project, same mistake.
I realized: hiring people who are great at DOING isn't enough. Hire people who are great at ASKING.
3 questions I now ask in every interview:
- "When was the last time you asked 'why' on a project?"
- "When did you last push back on your manager? What happened?"
- "What did you learn from your most recent mistake?"
Insight: Marketing in 2026 doesn't lack copy writers. It lacks people who ask "why isn't this copy converting?". Writers get replaced by AI. Askers get paid 3x.
Formula: Personal Story -> Lesson Learned -> Soft CTA (no hard sell)
Coaches use this pattern: tell a personal story -> derive a lesson others can apply -> close with a soft CTA ("Have you been in a similar situation? Comment to share").
When to use: sharing your own journey, transformation, methodology.
Full example (200 words):
In 2022, a client asked for a refund after one coaching session.
I was furious. I'd prepped 4 hours. Beautiful slides. Sharp framework. The client even nodded along.
Their feedback: "I felt like you talked too much. I needed someone to listen, not someone to teach me."
I sat with it for 3 days. Re-read 12 pages of notes. Made one adjustment.
In the next 60-minute session, I talked for 12 minutes. Asked questions for 48. Silent moments don't count.
That client didn't ask for a refund. They booked 8 more sessions. Referred 3 friends.
Lesson: A bad coach talks. A great coach asks. Clients already have the answer — they need someone to help them SEE it.
Have you ever been told "you're talking too much"? Comment with your experience.
Formula: Strong Hook -> Numbered List (3-5 items) -> Final Reveal/Twist
Creators use this because it scans well on mobile, easy to save/share. The final item must have a twist — surprises the reader and triggers a share.
When to use: listicles, "X ways to Y", "X signs of Z" — the highest-reach pattern on LinkedIn 2026.
Full example (200 words):
After auditing 47 LinkedIn profiles of founders in 90 days, I found 5 signs that kill personal brands:
1. Banner text reads "Founder | CEO | Visionary" No one searches for those 3 words. The banner is SEO real estate, not a business card.
2. No numbers in the headline "Helping companies grow" is empty. "Helped 200+ SMBs scale 3x in 18 months" is concrete.
3. Empty Featured section Visitor scrolls down -> sees no proof -> bounces. 90 seconds decides trust.
4. Posts only sharing news links LinkedIn 2026 algorithm penalizes link posts 70%. Quote the article + write 200 words of opinion -> 5x reach.
5. No specific audience in the bio "I help everyone" = "I help no one". The bio must NAME the audience: "I help B2B SaaS founders..."
Final reveal: I thought #1 was the most dangerous. Wrong. #5 — no defined audience — is the root cause of the other 4. Fix #5 first, the rest fall into place.
DIFFERENT from short-form hooks (see
references/hook-formulas-global.mdfor ad/video). Long-form hooks must build deeper curiosity to pull a reader through 800-3,000 words.
Formula: a question that challenges a widely held belief.
"Why are 99% of founders wrong when they hire their first CMO?"
Why it works: a question -> forces reflection. "99%" -> specific. "Wrong" -> creates tension. Readers want to know am I in the 1%?
Formula: a statement that flips the trend + "Here's why."
"I think LinkedIn is dying. Here's why."
Why it works: pushes back against consensus -> curiosity. "I think" -> opinion-led, doesn't claim absolute confidence. "Here's why" -> promises an explanation.
Formula: a hard-to-share action/decision + the lesson.
"I had to fire 5 people last week. Here's what it taught me."
Why it works: vulnerability -> trust. "Fire" -> high stakes. "5 people" -> specific. "Last week" -> freshness, not an old story.
Formula: framework name + result + audience size.
"I used the 3-7-21 framework to help 200 companies double pricing."
Why it works: framework = systematic = expert. "3-7-21" -> memorable. "200 companies" -> social proof. Readers want the framework.
Formula: after [analyzing/auditing/doing] X, here are Y findings.
"After analyzing 500 startups, here are 3 signs that kill a business."
Why it works: research-led -> authority. "500" -> not personal opinion. "3 signs" -> promises a scannable list. "Kill business" -> high stakes.
Formula: [specific character] [unusual action] -> surprising result.
"A college student started selling bubble tea on the street. 18 months later, she has 3 stores."
Why it works: specific character -> story brain activated. "Started on the street" -> quirky. "3 stores" -> curiosity about how. Reader wants the playbook.
| Hook | Twitter/X | Substack | Medium | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controversial question | GREAT | GREAT | GREAT | GOOD |
| Contrarian opinion | GREAT | GREAT | GREAT | GREAT |
| Mini-confession | GOOD | GREAT | GREAT | GOOD |
| Framework drop | GREAT | GOOD | GREAT | GREAT |
| Data drop | GREAT | GREAT | GREAT | GREAT |
| Character-driven | GOOD | GOOD | GREAT | GREAT |
Long-form differs from short-form in sentence rhythm — must rise and fall, never monotone.
Short and long sentences alternating in a pattern:
Before (bad — no rhythm):
Building a personal brand requires careful attention to many factors particularly the identification of a target audience and core values which then enables you to communicate your message effectively and build sustainable trust with your followers over time and across platforms.
After (good — has rhythm):
Building a personal brand is hard.
Everyone thinks you must know your "audience" and your "values" upfront. Wrong.
It took me 18 months and 200 posts to figure out who my audience is. You can't think your way into it — you have to write, fail, fix, repeat.
Your real audience = the people who comment 3+ times in 90 days.
Comparison: 70 words version one is monotone, no rhythm. 75 words version two has a 3-word punch, a 15-word detail, a 30-word expansion — rises and falls, easy to read.
Read it out loud. If you feel out of breath mid-paragraph -> sentence too long. If it sounds choppy and clipped -> sentences too short. The target is a wave rising and falling.
| Platform | Char/Word count | Para length | Hashtags | Image | Best post time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,300-3,000 chars | 2-3 lines | 3-5 | Optional carousel 8 slides | Tue-Thu 8-10 AM (target TZ) | |
| Twitter/X | Thread of 8-15 tweets | 1-2 lines/tweet | 0-2 | 1-2 images per thread | 7-9 AM and 5-7 PM |
| Substack | 800-2,000 words | 3-5 lines | N/A | 1-2 inline images | Tue / Thu 9 AM |
| Medium | 1,200-2,500 words | 3-5 lines | 5 tags | Hero + 1-2 inline | Mon / Wed 7-9 AM |
LinkedIn 2026:
Twitter/X 2026:
Substack / Medium:
1 long-form post -> 5 derivative content pieces in the next 7 days:
Day 0: Write 1 LinkedIn long-form (1500 chars)
Day 1: Cut into Twitter/X thread (10 tweets)
Day 2: Build a Carousel deck (8-10 Canva slides)
Day 3: Record short video script 60s (TikTok/Reels)
Day 4: Convert into Substack/email newsletter
Day 7: Summarize as podcast talking points (5 bullets)
Long-form -> Twitter/X thread:
Long-form -> Carousel:
Long-form -> Short video script (60s):
Long-form -> Newsletter:
Long-form -> Podcast talking points:
| Signal | Example | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Numbers/data | "After auditing 47 LinkedIn profiles..." | 1-2 per post |
| Named drop (carefully) | "A client at Stripe shared..." (with permission) | <1 per post |
| Frameworks/systems | "I use the 3-7-21 framework..." | 1 per post |
| Failures shared | "I had to fire 5 people last week..." | Vulnerability — 1 in 3 posts |
| Specific timeline | "Last week, 18 months ago, Q3 2024" | 1-2 per post |
Anti-pattern: avoid "many", "lots", "successful". Replace with concrete numbers.
Score before posting. Only post when >=80/100.
| # | Criterion | 8-10 pts | 5-7 pts | 1-4 pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hook strength | One of 6 formulas, line 1 stops scroll | OK but unremarkable | "Today I'd like to..." |
| 2 | Structure clarity | One of 3 patterns, clean flow | Has structure but loose | Sprawling, no frame |
| 3 | Authority signals | 3+ signals (data/named/framework) | 1-2 signals | 0 signals, self-narrative |
| 4 | Sentence rhythm | Short/long alternating 1-2-3 | OK but mostly even | Block text, no rhythm |
| 5 | Platform fit | Correct char count + para length | Roughly right | Wrong char count badly |
| 6 | CTA appropriate | Soft CTA or none | CTA OK but slightly pushy | Hard sell |
| 7 | Story authenticity | Real, specific characters and details | Has story but generic | Generic "a friend of mine..." |
| 8 | Lesson applicable | Reader can apply today | Generic lesson | Nothing actionable |
| 9 | Engagement bait | Closing question sparks healthy debate | Has a question but weak | No question or copy-paste prompt |
| 10 | AI disclosure | Notes AI assistance (voluntary) | N/A | Denies it when clearly AI |
| Total | Action |
|---|---|
| 90-100 | Post now, track reach |
| 80-89 | Post, note improvements |
| 70-79 | Fix the 1-2 lowest-scoring criteria first |
| <70 | Rewrite from the hook |
For each post, add a final line:
QA Score: [X]/100 — [Notes].
Before posting:
.agents/personal-brand-context-global.md — voice, audience, pillar matchSkill 26 (Global) | v1.0.0
Frequently asked questions
Long-form text to earn trust and build authority — DIFFERENT from sales ad copy (skill 05). This skill doesn't sell directly; it builds your position as an expert through valuable content.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/minhnv0807/ai-business-skills --skill "modules/personal-branding/en/26-thought-leadership-content-global". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro
Produce Part 3 of the 12-Part engagement: the four strategic-spine documents across 61 steps — 3.1 Business & SBU Analysis, 3.2 Segmentation Framework, 3.3 Brand Positioning & Communications, 3.4 DMFlow — with --doc single-document runs, --view v2 re-runs, and a --combined executive stitch. Triggers on "/digital-marketing-pro:four-core-documents", "produce the four core documents", "run part 3 of the engagement", "generate the strategic spine", "re-run positioning as v2". Requires an initialised
indranilbanerjee/contentforge
Generate 3-10 scored A/B test variations of a single content element — headline, hook, CTA, intro, or conclusion — each rated across 6 quality dimensions and ranked by your optimization goal (clicks, engagement, conversions, or readability), with top-3 recommendations and A/B test setup guidance (sample size, duration, success metric). Triggers on "/contentforge:cf-variants", "give me headline alternatives", "A/B test options for this CTA", "which hook is stronger", "write 5 versions of this int
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Use when the user asks to "build a win-back campaign", "re-engage lapsed subscribers", "run a re-permission / re-consent sweep", or "sunset my dead list"; produces a closed-loop reactivation program — a lapsed-cohort definition, a staged offer ladder, a re-consent (re-permission) capture step, and a sunset-confirm / suppression rule. Owns none of the SEND-N sub-item notes: engagement-decay / sunset is email-sequence-designer's and preference-center / frequency options is preference-frequency-man