Source profileQuality 91/100

gmickel/flow-next/plugins/flow-next/skills/flow-next-deps/SKILL.md

flow-next-deps

Show spec dependency graph and execution order. Use when asking 'what's blocking what', 'execution order', 'dependency graph', 'what order should specs run', 'critical path', 'which specs can run in parallel'.

Source repository stars
689
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-08-28
Source checked
2026-08-28

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Visualize spec dependencies, blocking chains, and execution phases.

Best for

  • "What's the execution order for specs?"
  • "What's blocking progress?"
  • "Show me the dependency graph"

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/gmickel/flow-next --skill "plugins/flow-next/skills/flow-next-deps"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "flow-next-deps" from https://github.com/gmickel/flow-next/blob/efe60be268df748bdfbfc546a38751f8cf26c912/plugins/flow-next/skills/flow-next-deps/SKILL.md at commit efe60be268df748bdfbfc546a38751f8cf26c912. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Setup

    Review the “Setup” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Setup” source section.
  2. 02

    Step 1: Gather Spec Data

    Build a consolidated view of all specs with their dependencies — a single heavy per-spec loop for the whole skill. Steps 2 and 3 reuse the cached file (bash vars do not survive across tool calls, so the cache is a file at a literal agent-composed path — compose once, e.g. 4 rand…

    Build a consolidated view of all specs with their dependencies — a single heavy per-spec loop for the whole skill. Steps 2 and 3 reuse the cached file (bash vars do not survive across tool calls, so the cache is a file…
  3. 03

    Step 2: Identify Blocking Chains

    Determine which specs are ready vs blocked (pure jq, works on any shell):

    Determine which specs are ready vs blocked (pure jq, works on any shell):
  4. 04

    Reuse the Step 1 gather — same literal path, NO re-fetch (one heavy loop total)

    SPECSFILE="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/flow-deps-specs-.json"

    SPECSFILE="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/flow-deps-specs-.json"
  5. 05

    Step 3: Compute Execution Phases

    Group specs into parallel execution phases:

    Group specs into parallel execution phases:

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Reads files

low · line 28

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

# ONE gather — Steps 2 and 3 read this file; never re-run the per-spec loop

Reads files

low · line 45

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

The per-spec `flowctl show` loop has run exactly once for this invocation. **Steps 2 and 3 read that file.** A second run of the gather loop has broken this.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score91/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars689SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
gmickel/flow-next
Skill path
plugins/flow-next/skills/flow-next-deps/SKILL.md
Commit
efe60be268df748bdfbfc546a38751f8cf26c912
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Flow-Next Dependency Graph

Visualize spec dependencies, blocking chains, and execution phases.

Preamble

flowctl is bundled with the plugin (not on PATH). Define once; subsequent blocks use $FLOWCTL:

FLOWCTL="${DROID_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}}/scripts/flowctl"
[ -x "$FLOWCTL" ] || FLOWCTL="<plugin-root>/scripts/flowctl"   # <plugin-root> = the directory two levels above this skill's SKILL.md file (the harness gave you that file's absolute path when the skill loaded); substitute it literally
[ -x "$FLOWCTL" ] || FLOWCTL=".flow/bin/flowctl"

Setup

$FLOWCTL detect --json | jq -e '.exists' >/dev/null && echo "OK: .flow/ exists" || echo "ERROR: run $FLOWCTL init"
command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "OK: jq installed" || echo "ERROR: brew install jq"

Step 1: Gather Spec Data

Build a consolidated view of all specs with their dependencies — a single heavy per-spec loop for the whole skill. Steps 2 and 3 reuse the cached file (bash vars do not survive across tool calls, so the cache is a file at a literal agent-composed path — compose <suffix> once, e.g. 4 random chars, and reuse the same literal path in every later block):

# ONE gather — Steps 2 and 3 read this file; never re-run the per-spec loop
SPECS_FILE="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/flow-deps-specs-<suffix>.json"
$FLOWCTL specs --json | jq -r '.specs[].id' | while read id; do
  $FLOWCTL show "$id" --json | jq -c '{
    id: .id,
    title: .title,
    status: .status,
    plan_review: .plan_review_status,
    deps: (.depends_on_epics // [])
  }'
done | jq -s '.' > "$SPECS_FILE"
cat "$SPECS_FILE"

Done when

  • $SPECS_FILE exists at the composed literal path and parses as a JSON array with one object per spec returned by flowctl specs --json.
  • The per-spec flowctl show loop has run exactly once for this invocation. Steps 2 and 3 read that file. A second run of the gather loop has broken this.

Step 2: Identify Blocking Chains

Determine which specs are ready vs blocked (pure jq, works on any shell):

# Reuse the Step 1 gather — same literal path, NO re-fetch (one heavy loop total)
SPECS_FILE="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/flow-deps-specs-<suffix>.json"

# Compute blocking status
jq -r '
  # Build status lookup
  (map({(.id): .status}) | add // {}) as $status |

  # Check each non-done spec
  .[] | select(.status != "done") |
  .id as $id | .title as $title |

  # Find deps that are not done
  ([.deps[] | select($status[.] != "done")] | join(", ")) as $blocked_by |

  if ($blocked_by | length) == 0 then
    "READY: \($id) - \($title)"
  else
    "BLOCKED: \($id) - \($title) (by: \($blocked_by))"
  end
' "$SPECS_FILE"

Done when

  • Every non-done spec in $SPECS_FILE emitted exactly one READY: or BLOCKED: line, and each BLOCKED: line names the specific deps holding it.
  • The jq ran against the cached file, not a fresh flowctl show sweep.

Step 3: Compute Execution Phases

Group specs into parallel execution phases:

# Reuse the Step 1 gather — same literal path, NO re-fetch (one heavy loop total)
SPECS_FILE="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/flow-deps-specs-<suffix>.json"

# Phase assignment algorithm (run in jq for reliability)
jq '
  # Build status lookup
  (map({(.id): .status}) | add // {}) as $status |

  # Filter to non-done specs
  [.[] | select(.status != "done")] as $open |

  # Assign phases iteratively
  reduce range(10) as $phase (
    {assigned: [], result: [], open: $open};

    .assigned as $assigned |
    .open as $remaining |

    # Find specs not yet assigned whose deps are all done or in earlier phases
    ([.open[] | select(
      ([.id] | inside($assigned) | not) and
      ((.deps // []) | all(. as $d | $status[$d] == "done" or ($assigned | index($d))))
    )] | map(.id)) as $ready |

    if ($ready | length) > 0 then
      .result += [{phase: ($phase + 1), specs: [.open[] | select(.id | IN($ready[]))]}] |
      .assigned += $ready
    else . end
  ) |
  # Emit the phases AND the residue: any open spec never assigned is UNRESOLVABLE — a
  # dependency cycle (A→B→A), a dep on a missing/closed spec, or a chain deeper than 10.
  # Dropping it silently is the one way /deps gives a WRONG answer (the graph it exists to
  # expose hides the deadlock). Surface it, with the offending deps for diagnosis.
  .assigned as $asg |
  { phases: .result,
    deadlocked: [ $open[] | select(.id as $i | ($asg | index($i)) | not)
                  | { id, status,
                      unresolved_deps: [ (.deps // [])[] | select(. as $d | ($asg | index($d)) or ($status[$d] == "done") | not) ] } ] }
' "$SPECS_FILE"

Done when

  • The jq result carries both .phases and .deadlocked, and every open spec appears in exactly one of them.
  • The report is rendered from .phases and .deadlocked. Phases narrated from a reading of the spec titles have broken this.

Output Format

Present results as:

## Spec Dependency Graph

### Status Overview

| Spec | Title | Status | Dependencies | Blocked By |
|------|-------|--------|--------------|------------|
| **fn-1-add-auth** | Add Authentication | **READY** | - | - |
| fn-2-add-oauth | Add OAuth Login | blocked | fn-1-add-auth | fn-1-add-auth |
| fn-3-user-profile | User Profile Page | blocked | fn-1-add-auth, fn-2-add-oauth | fn-2-add-oauth |

### Execution Phases

Render from the jq result's `.phases`:

| Phase | Specs | Can Start |
|-------|-------|-----------|
| **1** | fn-1-add-auth | **NOW** |
| 2 | fn-2-add-oauth | After Phase 1 |
| 3 | fn-3-user-profile | After Phase 2 |

### ⚠️ Deadlocked / Unresolvable

**This section renders exactly when `.deadlocked` is non-empty** — and when it does, it is the
most important part of the report. Each entry is an open spec that could not be placed in
any phase: a dependency **cycle**, a dep on a **missing/closed** spec, or a chain deeper
than 10. These are invisible to `ready`/pilot (they just never become ready) — this is the
one place the graph surfaces them.

| Spec | Status | Unresolved deps | Likely cause |
|------|--------|-----------------|--------------|
| fn-7-x | blocked | fn-9-y | fn-9-y not found / closed, or a cycle fn-7↔fn-9 |

For each, state the likely cause: if two deadlocked specs list each other → **cycle** (fix
with `flowctl spec rm-dep`); if an unresolved dep isn't among the open specs → **missing or
closed dependency**. **Every entry of `.deadlocked` reaches the report.** A report that lists phases while silently dropping an open spec has broken this.

### Critical Path

fn-1-add-auth → fn-2-add-oauth → fn-3-user-profile (3 phases)

This skill is read-only inspection. Edge changes are reported as commands for the operator to run — flowctl spec add-dep <spec> <dep> / rm-dep <spec> <dep>. A run that executes either command itself, or edits a spec file, has broken this.

Quick One-Liner

For a fast dependency check:

$FLOWCTL specs --json | jq -r '.specs[] | select(.status != "done") | "\(.id): \(.title) [\(.status)]"'

When to Use

  • "What's the execution order for specs?"
  • "What's blocking progress?"
  • "Show me the dependency graph"
  • "What's the critical path?"
  • "Which specs can run in parallel?"
  • "Why is Ralph working on X?"
  • "What should I work on next?"

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the flow-next-deps source document cover?

Visualize spec dependencies, blocking chains, and execution phases.

How do I install flow-next-deps?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/gmickel/flow-next --skill "plugins/flow-next/skills/flow-next-deps". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which permission-related actions were detected?

Static rules flagged read-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing