Best for
- Use when declaring an incident, coordinating multi-team response during an outage, leading a post-mortem, or setting up on-call practices for a new service.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills/engineering-team/skills/incident-commander/SKILL.md
Comprehensive incident response framework from detection through resolution and post-incident review. Battle-tested SRE/DevOps practices: severity classification, timeline reconstruction, structured post-incident analysis. Use when declaring an incident, coordinating multi-team response during an outage, leading a post-mortem, or setting up on-call practices for a new service.
Decision brief
Category: Engineering Team Tier: POWERFUL Author: Claude Skills Team Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: February 2026
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill "engineering-team/skills/incident-commander"Inspect the Agent Skill "incident-commander" from https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/blob/f2bac0a8f29b71846cc62d9d580249c2a3246030/engineering-team/skills/incident-commander/SKILL.md at commit f2bac0a8f29b71846cc62d9d580249c2a3246030. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “Usage Examples” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Automated Severity Classification - Intelligent incident triage based on impact and urgency metrics
1. Incident Classifier (incidentclassifier.py) - Analyzes incident descriptions and outputs severity levels - Recommends response teams and initial actions - Generates communication templates based on severity
1. Incident Classifier (incidentclassifier.py) - Analyzes incident descriptions and outputs severity levels - Recommends response teams and initial actions - Generates communication templates based on severity
Definition: Complete service failure affecting all users or critical business functions
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 24,975 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Category: Engineering Team
Tier: POWERFUL
Author: Claude Skills Team
Version: 1.0.0
Last Updated: February 2026
Incident response framework for availability/reliability incidents (outages, degradations, failed deploys): severity classification, timeline reconstruction, and post-incident review.
This is NOT security incident triage. For security events (ransomware, intrusion, data exfiltration, IOC analysis, NIST SP 800-61 forensics), route to incident-response. Both skills use SEV1-SEV4 labels; this one scores operational impact (users, revenue, SLA), while incident-response classifies attack types and forensic handling.
Incident Classifier (incident_classifier.py)
Timeline Reconstructor (timeline_reconstructor.py)
PIR Generator (pir_generator.py)
Definition: Complete service failure affecting all users or critical business functions
Characteristics:
Response Requirements:
Communication Frequency: Every 15 minutes until resolution
Definition: Significant degradation affecting subset of users or non-critical functions
Characteristics:
Response Requirements:
Communication Frequency: Every 30 minutes during active response
Definition: Limited impact with workarounds available
Characteristics:
Response Requirements:
Communication Frequency: At key milestones only
Definition: Minimal impact, cosmetic issues, or planned maintenance
Characteristics:
Response Requirements:
Communication Frequency: Standard development cycle updates
Command and Control
Communication Hub
Process Management
Post-Incident Leadership
Emergency Decisions (SEV1/2):
Resource Allocation:
Technical Decisions:
Subject: [SEV{severity}] {Service Name} - {Brief Description}
Incident Details:
- Start Time: {timestamp}
- Severity: SEV{level}
- Impact: {user impact description}
- Current Status: {investigating/mitigating/resolved}
Technical Details:
- Affected Services: {service list}
- Symptoms: {what users are experiencing}
- Initial Assessment: {suspected root cause if known}
Response Team:
- Incident Commander: {name}
- Technical Lead: {name}
- SMEs Engaged: {list}
Next Update: {timestamp}
Status Page: {link}
War Room: {bridge/chat link}
---
{Incident Commander Name}
{Contact Information}
Subject: URGENT - Customer-Impacting Outage - {Service Name}
Executive Summary:
{2-3 sentence description of customer impact and business implications}
Key Metrics:
- Time to Detection: {X minutes}
- Time to Engagement: {X minutes}
- Estimated Customer Impact: {number/percentage}
- Current Status: {status}
- ETA to Resolution: {time or "investigating"}
Leadership Actions Required:
- [ ] Customer communication approval
- [ ] PR/Communications coordination
- [ ] Resource allocation decisions
- [ ] External vendor engagement
Incident Commander: {name} ({contact})
Next Update: {time}
---
This is an automated alert from our incident response system.
We are currently experiencing {brief description of issue} affecting {scope of impact}.
Our engineering team was alerted at {time} and is actively working to resolve the issue. We will provide updates every {frequency} until resolved.
What we know:
- {factual statement of impact}
- {factual statement of scope}
- {brief status of response}
What we're doing:
- {primary response action}
- {secondary response action}
Workaround (if available):
{workaround steps or "No workaround currently available"}
We apologize for the inconvenience and will share more information as it becomes available.
Next update: {time}
Status page: {link}
Internal Stakeholders:
External Stakeholders:
| Stakeholder | SEV1 | SEV2 | SEV3 | SEV4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering Leadership | Real-time | 30min | 4hrs | Daily |
| Executive Team | 15min | 1hr | EOD | Weekly |
| Customer Support | Real-time | 30min | 2hrs | As needed |
| Customers | 15min | 1hr | Optional | None |
| Partners | 30min | 2hrs | Optional | None |
Detection Playbooks
Response Playbooks
Recovery Playbooks
# {Service/Component} Incident Response Runbook
## Quick Reference
- **Severity Indicators:** {list of conditions for each severity level}
- **Key Contacts:** {on-call rotations and escalation paths}
- **Critical Commands:** {list of emergency commands with descriptions}
## Detection
### Monitoring Alerts
- {Alert name}: {description and thresholds}
- {Alert name}: {description and thresholds}
### Manual Detection Signs
- {Symptom}: {what to look for and where}
- {Symptom}: {what to look for and where}
## Initial Response (0-15 minutes)
1. **Assess Severity**
- [ ] Check {primary metric}
- [ ] Verify {secondary indicator}
- [ ] Classify as SEV{level} based on {criteria}
2. **Establish Command**
- [ ] Page Incident Commander if SEV1/2
- [ ] Create incident tracking ticket
- [ ] Join war room: {link/bridge info}
3. **Initial Investigation**
- [ ] Check recent deployments: {deployment log location}
- [ ] Review error logs: {log location and queries}
- [ ] Verify dependencies: {dependency check commands}
## Mitigation Strategies
### Strategy 1: {Name}
**Use when:** {conditions}
**Steps:**
1. {detailed step with commands}
2. {detailed step with expected outcomes}
3. {validation step}
**Rollback Plan:**
1. {rollback step}
2. {verification step}
### Strategy 2: {Name}
{similar structure}
## Recovery and Validation
1. **Service Restoration**
- [ ] {restoration step}
- [ ] Wait for {metric} to return to normal
- [ ] Validate end-to-end functionality
2. **Communication**
- [ ] Update status page
- [ ] Notify stakeholders
- [ ] Schedule PIR
## Common Pitfalls
- **{Pitfall}:** {description and how to avoid}
- **{Pitfall}:** {description and how to avoid}
## Reference Information
→ See references/reference-information.md for details
## Usage Examples
### Example 1: Database Connection Pool Exhaustion
```bash
# Classify the incident
echo '{"description": "Users reporting 500 errors, database connections timing out", "affected_users": "80%", "business_impact": "high"}' | python scripts/incident_classifier.py
# Reconstruct timeline from logs
python scripts/timeline_reconstructor.py --input assets/sample_timeline_events.json --output timeline.md
# Generate PIR after resolution
python scripts/pir_generator.py --incident assets/sample_incident_data.json --timeline timeline.md --output pir.md
# Quick classification from stdin
echo "API rate limits causing customer API calls to fail" | python scripts/incident_classifier.py --format text
# Build timeline from multiple sources
python scripts/timeline_reconstructor.py --input assets/simple_timeline_events.json --detect-phases --gap-analysis
# Generate comprehensive PIR
python scripts/pir_generator.py --incident assets/sample_incident_pir_data.json --rca-method fishbone --action-items
Maintain Calm Leadership
Document Everything
Effective Communication
Technical Excellence
Blameless Culture
Action Item Discipline
Knowledge Sharing
Continuous Improvement
Frequently asked questions
Category: Engineering Team Tier: POWERFUL Author: Claude Skills Team Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: February 2026
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill "engineering-team/skills/incident-commander". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
NintendaDev/unikit-ai
Generate and maintain the project's TECHNICAL documentation from its codebase — scans the project structure, tech stack, and module boundaries, then writes a lean README landing page plus detailed topic pages (architecture, modules, setup, build, APIs), only the docs that are relevant. Use whenever the user wants to create, update, or validate documentation of the CODE or the project itself, e.g. "generate documentation", "create docs", "write the README", "update the project docs", "document th
vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public
Scans public GitHub repos for agent skills, dev practices, and code patterns. Use when enriching skills, setting team policy, or researching a build domain.
oaustegard/claude-skills
Orchestrates parallel API instances, delegated sub-tasks, and multi-agent workflows with streaming and tool-enabled delegation patterns. Routes by surface — native subagents in Cowork and Claude Code, httpx fan-out on claude.ai — and covers Gemini delegation via the Cloudflare AI Gateway on every surface. Use for parallel analysis, multi-perspective reviews, or complex task decomposition.
mgiovani/cc-arsenal
Multi-agent review team: architecture, security, performance, testing, style, docs/UX, plus an adversary that cross-examines the other 6, for security-sensitive, architectural, or large PRs (15+ files) where a single-agent pass risks missing cross-cutting issues. Use for auth/payments/PII changes, schema/pattern changes, compliance sign-off, or when asked to 'get the review team on this' / 'multi-agent review' / 'thorough review before merge'. For a standard PR or a quick pre-merge check, use /r