Source profileQuality 93/100

adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/investigating-insider-threat-indicators/SKILL.md

investigating-insider-threat-indicators

Investigates insider threat indicators including data exfiltration attempts, unauthorized access patterns, policy violations, and pre-departure behaviors using SIEM analytics, DLP alerts, and HR data correlation. Use when SOC teams receive insider threat referrals from HR, detect anomalous data movement by employees, or need to build investigation timelines for potential insider threats.

Source repository stars
52
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-08-22
Source checked
2026-08-28

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Investigates insider threat indicators including data exfiltration attempts, unauthorized access patterns, policy violations, and pre-departure behaviors using SIEM analytics, DLP alerts, and HR data correlation.

Best for

  • HR refers a departing employee for monitoring during their notice period
  • DLP alerts indicate bulk data downloads or transfers to personal storage
  • UEBA detects anomalous access patterns deviating significantly from peer baselines

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill "cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/investigating-insider-threat-indicators"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "investigating-insider-threat-indicators" from https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/blob/7f71af8164e8f5a775253417aa405b5d9d063faf/cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/investigating-insider-threat-indicators/SKILL.md at commit 7f71af8164e8f5a775253417aa405b5d9d063faf. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Workflow

    Before any monitoring, ensure proper authorization:

    Before any monitoring, ensure proper authorization:Query comprehensive activity for the subject:Bulk File Downloads (SharePoint/OneDrive):
  2. 02

    Step 1: Establish Investigation Scope and Legal Authorization

    Before any monitoring, ensure proper authorization:

    Before any monitoring, ensure proper authorization:
  3. 03

    Step 2: Build Activity Timeline from SIEM

    Query comprehensive activity for the subject:

    Query comprehensive activity for the subject:
  4. 04

    Step 3: Detect Data Exfiltration Indicators

    Bulk File Downloads (SharePoint/OneDrive):

    Bulk File Downloads (SharePoint/OneDrive):USB/Removable Media Usage:Email-Based Exfiltration:
  5. 05

    Step 4: Analyze Access Pattern Anomalies

    Accessing Sensitive Systems Outside Normal Scope:

    Accessing Sensitive Systems Outside Normal Scope:After-Hours and Weekend Activity:

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Network access

medium · line 87

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

search index=endpoint sourcetype="endpoint:device_connect"

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score93/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars52SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai
Skill path
cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/investigating-insider-threat-indicators/SKILL.md
Commit
7f71af8164e8f5a775253417aa405b5d9d063faf
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Investigating Insider Threat Indicators

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • HR refers a departing employee for monitoring during their notice period
  • DLP alerts indicate bulk data downloads or transfers to personal storage
  • UEBA detects anomalous access patterns deviating significantly from peer baselines
  • Management reports concerns about an employee accessing sensitive data outside their role

Do not use without proper legal authorization — insider threat investigations must be coordinated with HR, Legal, and Privacy teams before monitoring begins.

Prerequisites

  • Legal authorization and HR referral documenting investigation justification
  • SIEM with DLP, endpoint, email, proxy, and authentication log sources
  • Data Loss Prevention (DLP) system (Microsoft Purview, Symantec, Forcepoint) with policy alerts
  • Endpoint monitoring capability (EDR with USB/removable media logging)
  • HR data feed providing employment status, notice dates, and access entitlements
  • Chain of custody procedures for evidence preservation

Workflow

Step 1: Establish Investigation Scope and Legal Authorization

Before any monitoring, ensure proper authorization:

INSIDER THREAT INVESTIGATION AUTHORIZATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Case ID:           IT-2024-0089
Subject:           [Employee Name] — [Department]
Authorized By:     [CISO / General Counsel]
Referral Source:   HR — Employee submitted resignation, 2-week notice
Justification:     Employee has access to trade secrets and customer PII
Scope:             Email, file access, USB, cloud storage, printing
Duration:          2024-03-15 to 2024-03-29 (notice period)
Privacy Review:    Completed — compliant with acceptable use policy

Step 2: Build Activity Timeline from SIEM

Query comprehensive activity for the subject:

index=* (user="jsmith" OR src_user="jsmith" OR sender="[email protected]"
         OR SubjectUserName="jsmith")
earliest="2024-03-01" latest=now
| eval event_category = case(
    sourcetype LIKE "%dlp%", "DLP",
    sourcetype LIKE "%proxy%", "Web Access",
    sourcetype LIKE "%email%", "Email",
    sourcetype LIKE "%WinEventLog%", "Endpoint",
    sourcetype LIKE "%o365%", "Cloud",
    sourcetype LIKE "%vpn%", "VPN",
    sourcetype LIKE "%badge%", "Physical Access",
    1=1, sourcetype
  )
| stats count by event_category, sourcetype, _time
| timechart span=1d count by event_category

Step 3: Detect Data Exfiltration Indicators

Bulk File Downloads (SharePoint/OneDrive):

index=o365 sourcetype="o365:management:activity" Operation IN ("FileDownloaded", "FileSynced")
UserId="[email protected]" earliest=-30d
| stats count AS downloads, sum(eval(if(isnotnull(FileSize), FileSize, 0))) AS total_bytes,
        dc(SourceFileName) AS unique_files
  by UserId, SiteUrl, _time
| bin _time span=1d
| eval total_gb = round(total_bytes / 1073741824, 2)
| where downloads > 50 OR total_gb > 1
| sort - total_gb

USB/Removable Media Usage:

index=sysmon EventCode=1 Computer="WORKSTATION-JSMITH"
(CommandLine="*removable*" OR CommandLine="*usb*"
 OR Image="*\\xcopy*" OR Image="*\\robocopy*")
| table _time, Computer, User, Image, CommandLine
| append [
    search index=endpoint sourcetype="endpoint:device_connect"
    user="jsmith" device_type="removable"
    | table _time, user, device_name, device_serial, action
  ]
| sort _time

Email-Based Exfiltration:

index=email sourcetype="o365:messageTrace"
SenderAddress="[email protected]"
| eval is_external = if(match(RecipientAddress, "@company\.com$"), 0, 1)
| eval has_attachment = if(isnotnull(AttachmentName), 1, 0)
| stats count AS total_emails,
        sum(is_external) AS external_emails,
        sum(has_attachment) AS with_attachments,
        sum(eval(if(is_external=1 AND has_attachment=1, 1, 0))) AS external_with_attach,
        sum(Size) AS total_size_bytes
  by SenderAddress
| eval external_attach_pct = round(external_with_attach / total_emails * 100, 1)
| eval total_size_mb = round(total_size_bytes / 1048576, 1)

Cloud Storage Upload Detection:

index=proxy user="jsmith"
(dest IN ("*dropbox.com", "*drive.google.com", "*onedrive.live.com",
          "*box.com", "*wetransfer.com", "*mega.nz")
 OR category="cloud-storage")
http_method=POST
| stats count AS uploads, sum(bytes_out) AS total_uploaded
  by user, dest, category
| eval uploaded_mb = round(total_uploaded / 1048576, 1)
| sort - uploaded_mb

Step 4: Analyze Access Pattern Anomalies

Accessing Sensitive Systems Outside Normal Scope:

index=auth user="jsmith" action=success earliest=-30d
| stats dc(app) AS unique_apps, values(app) AS apps_accessed by user
| join user type=left [
    | inputlookup role_app_mapping.csv
    | search role="Financial Analyst"
    | stats values(authorized_app) AS authorized_apps by role
    | eval user="jsmith"
  ]
| eval unauthorized = mvfilter(NOT match(apps_accessed, mvjoin(authorized_apps, "|")))
| where isnotnull(unauthorized)
| table user, unauthorized, authorized_apps

After-Hours and Weekend Activity:

index=* user="jsmith" earliest=-30d
| eval hour = tonumber(strftime(_time, "%H"))
| eval is_offhours = if(hour < 7 OR hour > 19, 1, 0)
| eval day = strftime(_time, "%A")
| eval is_weekend = if(day IN ("Saturday", "Sunday"), 1, 0)
| stats count AS total, sum(is_offhours) AS offhours, sum(is_weekend) AS weekend by user
| eval offhours_pct = round(offhours / total * 100, 1)
| eval weekend_pct = round(weekend / total * 100, 1)

Step 5: Correlate with HR and Physical Security Data

Compare activity to resignation timeline:

| makeresults
| eval user="jsmith",
       resignation_date="2024-03-15",
       last_day="2024-03-29",
       access_revocation="2024-03-29 17:00"
| join user [
    search index=* user="jsmith" earliest=-90d
    | bin _time span=1d
    | stats count AS daily_events, dc(sourcetype) AS data_sources by user, _time
  ]
| eval phase = case(
    _time < relative_time(now(), "-30d"), "Normal (Pre-Resignation)",
    _time >= strptime(resignation_date, "%Y-%m-%d") AND _time <= strptime(last_day, "%Y-%m-%d"),
      "Notice Period",
    1=1, "Transition"
  )
| chart avg(daily_events) AS avg_events by phase

Badge/Physical Access Correlation:

index=badge_access employee_id="jsmith" earliest=-30d
| stats count AS badge_events, values(door_name) AS doors_accessed,
        earliest(_time) AS first_badge, latest(_time) AS last_badge by employee_id
| eval areas = mvcount(doors_accessed)

Step 6: Preserve Evidence and Document Findings

Maintain chain of custody for all collected evidence:

import hashlib
import json
from datetime import datetime

evidence_log = {
    "case_id": "IT-2024-0089",
    "investigator": "soc_analyst_tier2",
    "collection_time": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
    "items": [
        {
            "item_id": "EV-001",
            "description": "Splunk export — all user activity 2024-03-01 to 2024-03-15",
            "file": "jsmith_activity_export.csv",
            "sha256": hashlib.sha256(open("jsmith_activity_export.csv", "rb").read()).hexdigest(),
            "collected_by": "analyst_doe",
            "collection_method": "Splunk search export"
        },
        {
            "item_id": "EV-002",
            "description": "DLP alert details — 47 policy violations",
            "file": "dlp_alerts_jsmith.json",
            "sha256": hashlib.sha256(open("dlp_alerts_jsmith.json", "rb").read()).hexdigest(),
            "collected_by": "analyst_doe",
            "collection_method": "Microsoft Purview export"
        }
    ]
}

with open(f"evidence_log_{evidence_log['case_id']}.json", "w") as f:
    json.dump(evidence_log, f, indent=2)

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Insider ThreatRisk posed by individuals with legitimate access who misuse it for unauthorized purposes
Data ExfiltrationUnauthorized transfer of data outside the organization via email, USB, cloud, or other channels
DLPData Loss Prevention — technology monitoring and blocking unauthorized data transfers based on content policies
Notice Period MonitoringEnhanced surveillance of departing employees during their resignation-to-departure window
Chain of CustodyDocumented evidence handling procedures ensuring forensic integrity for potential legal proceedings
Need-to-Know ViolationAccessing information or systems beyond what is required for an employee's role or current tasks

Tools & Systems

  • Microsoft Purview (formerly DLP): Data classification and loss prevention platform monitoring endpoints, email, and cloud storage
  • Splunk UBA: User behavior analytics detecting insider threat patterns through ML-based anomaly detection
  • Forcepoint Insider Threat: Dedicated insider threat detection platform with behavioral indicators and risk scoring
  • DTEX InTERCEPT: Endpoint-based insider threat detection focusing on user activity metadata collection
  • Code42 Incydr: Data risk detection platform specializing in file exfiltration monitoring across endpoints and cloud

Common Scenarios

  • Departing Employee: Bulk download of customer lists and product roadmaps during two-week notice period
  • Disgruntled Employee: After negative performance review, employee accesses executive salary data outside their role
  • Contractor Overreach: External consultant accessing systems beyond contracted scope, downloading source code
  • Account Misuse: Employee sharing credentials with unauthorized third party for competitive intelligence
  • Sabotage Indicator: IT admin creating backdoor accounts and modifying system configurations before departure

Output Format

INSIDER THREAT INVESTIGATION REPORT — IT-2024-0089
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Subject:      jsmith (Financial Analyst, Finance Dept)
Period:       2024-03-01 to 2024-03-15
Status:       Employee resigned 2024-03-15, last day 2024-03-29

Key Findings:
  [HIGH]  3,847 files downloaded from SharePoint (12.4 GB) — 10x peer average
  [HIGH]  USB device connected 14 times during notice period (0 times prior month)
  [HIGH]  187 emails with attachments sent to personal Gmail
  [MEDIUM] After-hours activity increased 340% during notice period
  [MEDIUM] Accessed HR salary database 3 times (not authorized for role)

Timeline:
  Mar 01-14:  Normal activity baseline (avg 150 events/day)
  Mar 15:     Resignation submitted (activity spike to 890 events)
  Mar 16-17:  Weekend access — 2,100 SharePoint downloads
  Mar 18:     USB device first connected, DLP alert triggered

Evidence Collected:   4 items (SHA-256 verified, chain of custody documented)
Recommendation:       Immediate access revocation recommended
                      Evidence package prepared for Legal review

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the investigating-insider-threat-indicators source document cover?

Investigates insider threat indicators including data exfiltration attempts, unauthorized access patterns, policy violations, and pre-departure behaviors using SIEM analytics, DLP alerts, and HR data correlation.

How do I install investigating-insider-threat-indicators?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill "cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/investigating-insider-threat-indicators". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which permission-related actions were detected?

Static rules flagged network in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 9836,049

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

dask

Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.

Computed 983,352

synthetic-sciences/openscience

pharmacology-wetlab

Computational analysis of pharmacology wet-lab experiments. Western blot densitometry, xenograft tumor growth inhibition, pharmaceutical stability modeling (Arrhenius), radiolabeled antibody biodistribution, MIRD dosimetry, and adverse event grading. For drug databases use chembl-database or fda-database; for molecular docking use diffdock.

Computed 97811

nexscope-ai/eCommerce-Skills

shopify-marketing

Comprehensive Shopify marketing strategy and execution. SEO optimization, email marketing automation, paid advertising management, conversion rate optimization, and customer retention strategies specifically for DTC Shopify brands. Use when the user asks about Shopify marketing, DTC marketing, Shopify SEO, or Shopify store growth.

Computed 97603

nexscope-ai/Amazon-Skills

amazon-price-tracker

Amazon price monitoring and competitive pricing intelligence. Real-time price tracking, Buy Box analysis, promotion detection, and dynamic pricing strategy optimization. Use when the user asks about price monitoring, competitor pricing, Buy Box tracking, or pricing strategy.