Best for
- Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing strangler fig pattern or branch by abstraction, decomposing monoliths, upgrading frameworks or languages, or reducing technical debt without disrupting business operatio…
Jeffallan/claude-skills/skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md
Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases. Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing strangler fig pattern or branch by abstraction, decomposing monoliths, upgrading frameworks or languages, or reducing technical debt without disrupting business operations.
Decision brief
Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill "skills/legacy-modernizer"Inspect the Agent Skill "legacy-modernizer" from https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills/blob/882ef55e377dbf9a4dbe496bb41ac6ccd0e555cf/skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md at commit 882ef55e377dbf9a4dbe496bb41ac6ccd0e555cf. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
1. Assess system — Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints. Produce a dependency map and risk register before proceeding. - Validation checkpoint: Confirm all external integrations and data contracts are documented before moving to step 2.
if flagenabled("USENEWPAYMENTGATEWAY"): result = newgateway.charge(order) else: result = legacygateway.charge(order) python
Load detailed guidance based on context:
Review the “Code Examples” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “Strangler Fig Facade (Python)” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.
return self._new.fetch(order_id)Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 95/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 11,171 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Assess system — Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints. Produce a dependency map and risk register before proceeding.
Plan migration — Design an incremental roadmap with explicit rollback strategies per phase. Reference references/system-assessment.md for code analysis templates.
Build safety net — Create characterization tests and monitoring before touching production code. Target 80%+ coverage of existing behavior.
Migrate incrementally — Apply strangler fig pattern with feature flags. Route traffic via a facade; shift load gradually.
Validate & iterate — Run full test suite, review monitoring dashboards, and confirm business behavior is preserved before retiring legacy code.
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Strangler Fig | references/strangler-fig-pattern.md | Incremental replacement, facade layer, routing |
| Refactoring | references/refactoring-patterns.md | Extract service, branch by abstraction, adapters |
| Migration | references/migration-strategies.md | Database, UI, API, framework migrations |
| Testing | references/legacy-testing.md | Characterization tests, golden master, approval |
| Assessment | references/system-assessment.md | Code analysis, dependency mapping, risk evaluation |
# facade.py — routes requests to legacy or new service based on a feature flag
import os
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
from new_service import NewOrderService
class OrderServiceFacade:
def __init__(self):
self._legacy = LegacyOrderService()
self._new = NewOrderService()
def get_order(self, order_id: str):
if os.getenv("USE_NEW_ORDER_SERVICE", "false").lower() == "true":
return self._new.fetch(order_id)
return self._legacy.get(order_id)
# feature_flags.py — thin wrapper around an environment or config-based flag store
import os
def flag_enabled(flag_name: str, default: bool = False) -> bool:
"""Check whether a migration feature flag is active."""
return os.getenv(flag_name, str(default)).lower() == "true"
# Usage
if flag_enabled("USE_NEW_PAYMENT_GATEWAY"):
result = new_gateway.charge(order)
else:
result = legacy_gateway.charge(order)
# test_characterization_orders.py
# Captures existing legacy behavior as a golden-master safety net.
import pytest
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
service = LegacyOrderService()
@pytest.mark.parametrize("order_id,expected_status", [
("ORD-001", "SHIPPED"),
("ORD-002", "PENDING"),
("ORD-003", "CANCELLED"),
])
def test_order_status_golden_master(order_id, expected_status):
"""Fail loudly if legacy behavior changes unexpectedly."""
result = service.get(order_id)
assert result["status"] == expected_status, (
f"Characterization broken for {order_id}: "
f"expected {expected_status}, got {result['status']}"
)
When implementing modernization, provide:
Strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, characterization testing, incremental migration, feature flags, canary deployments, API versioning, database refactoring, microservices extraction, technical debt reduction, zero-downtime deployment
Frequently asked questions
Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill "skills/legacy-modernizer". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged network in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
majiayu000/spellbook
Complete testing strategy covering TDD workflow, test pyramid, unit/integration/E2E/property testing, framework best practices (Jest, Vitest, pytest), mock strategies, and CI integration. Use when writing tests, reviewing test quality, or establishing testing standards.
dotnet/skills
Analyzes test suites in any language and tags each test with standardized traits (positive, negative, critical-path, boundary, smoke, regression, integration, performance, security). Use when the user wants to categorize, audit, or label tests with traits. Works across .NET (MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit), Python (pytest), TS/JS (Jest/Vitest), Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++ — auto-editing when the framework has canonical tag syntax, otherwise report-only. Do not use for writ
Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills
Shared Python 3.11+ development standards covering type safety (ty, native generics, Protocol, TypeIs), layered architecture, error handling, performance, identifier naming, UI/CLI patterns (Rich/Typer), testing requirements (pytest, 80% coverage, TDD), and quality gates. Activates when any Python skill or agent needs to apply shared standards for implementation, code review, refactoring, or test authoring.
trailofbits/skills
Mutation-driven test vector generation. Finds implementations of a cryptographic algorithm or protocol, runs mutation testing to identify escaped mutants, then generates new test vectors that deliberately exercise the uncovered code paths. Compares before/after mutation kill rates to prove vector effectiveness. Use when generating cryptographic test vectors, measuring Wycheproof coverage gaps, finding escaped mutants via mutation testing, creating cross-implementation test suites, or improving t