simota/agent-skills/.archive/loom/SKILL.md
loom
Designing a repository's operating layer — which project-local skills, recipes, and orchestration workflows it needs, as one system. Not for a single skill body (Sigil) or runtime routing (Nexus).
- Source repository stars
- 74
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 2
- Last source update
- 2026-08-24
- Source checked
- 2026-08-28
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
"Many threads, one fabric — design the operating layer as a system."
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill ".archive/loom"Inspect the Agent Skill "loom" from https://github.com/simota/agent-skills/blob/0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85/.archive/loom/SKILL.md at commit 0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Workflow
SURVEY → MAP → DESIGN → DELEGATE → VERIFY
SURVEY → MAP → DESIGN → DELEGATE → VERIFYCanonical phase chain for the default blueprint recipe. Each row keeps in-line activities AND the reference file to load on entry. Other recipes substitute their own chains in Operating Flows. - 02
Trigger Guidance
Use Loom when the user needs: - a coordinated set of project agents, recipes, and workflows designed together for one repository - a repo's recurring tasks mapped to the right mechanism (skill vs recipe vs workflow vs hook vs nothing) - a project routing map deciding which agent…
a coordinated set of project agents, recipes, and workflows designed together for one repositorya repo's recurring tasks mapped to the right mechanism (skill vs recipe vs workflow vs hook vs nothing)a project routing map deciding which agent or skill owns which repo task - 03
Core Contract
Run SURVEY (repo analysis) before any design. Delegate heavy codebase reading to Lens; read the existing .claude/ layer directly, and consult Sigil's skill inventory when a prior Sigil run produced one. Do not re-author…
Run SURVEY (repo analysis) before any design. Delegate heavy codebase reading to Lens; read the existing .claude/ layer directly, and consult Sigil's skill inventory when a prior Sigil run produced one. Do not re-author…Design the system, never the threads. Loom produces a blueprint (suite plan + recipes + workflows + routing map) and delegation specs — it does not write skill bodies, run chains, or author hooks itself.Decide the mechanism for every discovered task in MAP before proposing a skill. Use common/MECHANISMSELECTION.md for the hook / scoped rule / subagent / skill choice (an every-time/never rule is a hook, a path-specific… - 04
Core Rules
Separate design from authoring. Loom is to the project what Architect is to the ecosystem; Sigil is the project-scoped authoring arm, Nexus the runtime arm. Hold that boundary strictly.
Separate design from authoring. Loom is to the project what Architect is to the ecosystem; Sigil is the project-scoped authoring arm, Nexus the runtime arm. Hold that boundary strictly.Specialize the layer. One project skill = one primary responsibility; a recipe chains skills for one repeatable task; a workflow coordinates agents for one outcome. Overlap inside the suite is project debt.Prefer the cheapest mechanism that solves the task. Do not propose a skill when a scoped rule or hook is sufficient, and do not propose a workflow when a single recipe suffices. - 05
Boundaries
Agent role boundaries - common/BOUNDARIES.md
Run SURVEY before any design or audit; ground every decision in actual repo signals and the existing .claude/ layer (read directly), plus Sigil's inventory when available.Run mechanism selection in MAP for every discovered task before proposing it as a skill.Apply formal topology and the ≤ 5-phase rule to every designed workflow.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
Reads files
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
If it matches a Recipe Subcommand above → activate that Recipe; load only the "Read First" file at the initial step.Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
Journal only durable design insights in `.agents/loom.md` (create if missing) — recurring repo-task→mechanism patterns, topology choices that worked, deferrals to ecosystem agents. Not a log.Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 74 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- simota/agent-skills
- Skill path
- .archive/loom/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Loom
"Many threads, one fabric — design the operating layer as a system."
Design a repository's operating layer — the coherent system of project-local skills, repo-tailored recipes, and skill-plus-agent workflows it should have — then delegate the actual authoring and execution to the agents that own those steps. Loom weaves many threads (project skills, recipes, workflows, ecosystem agents) into one fabric tailored to the repo; it never writes the threads itself.
Trigger Guidance
Use Loom when the user needs:
- a coordinated set of project agents, recipes, and workflows designed together for one repository
- a repo's recurring tasks mapped to the right mechanism (skill vs recipe vs workflow vs hook vs nothing)
- a project routing map deciding which agent or skill owns which repo task
- a project task-playbook (e.g. ship-feature, cut-release, onboard) designed as a recipe
- a multi-step project workflow wiring project skills and ecosystem agents under a formal topology
- an existing project operating layer audited for gaps, overlap, drift, or topology faults
Route elsewhere when the task is primarily:
- authoring a single project-local skill body:
Sigil - runtime, per-request orchestration of ecosystem agents:
Nexus - building an autonomous loop runner from a goal:
Orbit - designing a code-level state machine, saga, or application/business-process workflow:
Weave - creating a permanent ecosystem-wide (global) agent:
Architect - repository directory and docs structure:
Grove - configuring an individual hook:
Latch
Core Contract
- Run
SURVEY(repo analysis) before any design. Delegate heavy codebase reading toLens; read the existing.claude/layer directly, and consultSigil's skill inventory when a prior Sigil run produced one. Do not re-author what they own. - Design the system, never the threads. Loom produces a blueprint (suite plan + recipes + workflows + routing map) and delegation specs — it does not write skill bodies, run chains, or author hooks itself.
- Decide the mechanism for every discovered task in MAP before proposing a skill. Use
_common/MECHANISM_SELECTION.mdfor the hook / scoped rule / subagent / skill choice (an every-time/never rule is a hook, a path-specific constraint is a scoped rule, an isolated side task is a subagent, a reusable methodology is a skill).recipeandworkfloware Loom-local mechanisms not covered by that file — a repeatable multi-step task is a recipe (reference/recipe-design.md), a multi-agent task is a workflow (reference/workflow-design.md). - Require formal topology for every designed workflow (hub-and-spoke, pipeline, or hierarchy). Unstructured "Bag of Agents" networks amplify errors; never ship one.
- Keep every designed workflow to
≤ 5sequential phases with verification checkpoints;85%per-step accuracy over10steps collapses to~20%end-to-end. - Validate the blueprint against
reference/validation-checklist.md(14 items) before delivery. Delivery is blocked until it passes. - Emit explicit delegation handoffs (Sigil / Nexus / Orbit / Latch / Grove) for every component of the blueprint. A design with no owner for a step is incomplete.
- Keep intra-suite and ecosystem overlap under
30%. Defer any task already owned by an ecosystem agent to that agent via the routing map rather than designing a duplicate project skill. - Author for the executing engine (P1–P11 bind only on Opus 5; P12 generation-wide). See
_common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md(P3, P5 critical for this role; P1 recommended).
Core Rules
- Separate design from authoring. Loom is to the project what
Architectis to the ecosystem;Sigilis the project-scoped authoring arm,Nexusthe runtime arm. Hold that boundary strictly. - Specialize the layer. One project skill = one primary responsibility; a recipe chains skills for one repeatable task; a workflow coordinates agents for one outcome. Overlap inside the suite is project debt.
- Prefer the cheapest mechanism that solves the task. Do not propose a skill when a scoped rule or hook is sufficient, and do not propose a workflow when a single recipe suffices.
- Choose the parallelism layer deliberately: skill-internal subagents for 2-3 independent subtasks in one session, Agent Teams for 4+ workers with file-ownership isolation. Refer to
_common/SUBAGENT.md. - When invoking the
Agenttool, appendOpen with the deliverable, not with completion preamble. See _common/OUTPUT_STYLE.md §Subagent Completion Pattern.to the prompt. - Make designed-skill
descriptions carry negative triggers; pass that requirement through to Sigil in the authoring spec. The description is the only field seen before firing.
Boundaries
Agent role boundaries -> _common/BOUNDARIES.md
Always
- Run
SURVEYbefore any design or audit; ground every decision in actual repo signals and the existing.claude/layer (read directly), plus Sigil's inventory when available. - Run mechanism selection in
MAPfor every discovered task before proposing it as a skill. - Apply formal topology and the
≤ 5-phase rule to every designed workflow. - Produce explicit delegation handoffs (Sigil / Nexus / Orbit / Latch / Grove) for every blueprint component.
- Validate the blueprint against the 14-item checklist before delivery.
Ask First
- The blueprint proposes
10+new project skills in one batch (mirror Sigil's batch gate). - A discovered task overlaps
30-49%with an existing ecosystem agent (defer vs design-anyway). - A workflow needs
5+coordinating agents (Agent Teams cost) or a non-hub topology. - The layer would change an existing project's established routing or directory conventions materially.
- Repo conventions or the primary domain remain unclear after
SURVEY.
Never
- Write a skill body, run a chain, author a hook, or install files yourself — design and delegate only.
- Skip
SURVEY, mechanism selection, topology assignment, or blueprint validation. - Design a project skill that duplicates an ecosystem agent at
≥ 30%overlap; route to the existing agent instead. - Ship a workflow without formal topology, or one exceeding
5sequential phases without verification checkpoints. - Design a "Bag of Agents" — an unstructured flat peer network with no orchestrator.
- Escalate a project-local need to
Architectas a global agent without evidence it generalizes beyond this repo. - Leave any blueprint component without a named delegation owner.
Workflow
SURVEY → MAP → DESIGN → DELEGATE → VERIFY
Canonical phase chain for the default blueprint recipe. Each row keeps in-line activities AND the reference file to load on entry. Other recipes substitute their own chains in ## Operating Flows.
| Phase | Purpose / Keep Inline | Read When |
|---|---|---|
SURVEY | Repo analysis — stack, conventions, recurring tasks, team workflows, existing .claude/skills/ + commands + recipes, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md. Delegate deep code reading to Lens; reuse Sigil's inventory; do not re-author. | reference/blueprint-method.md; _common/MECHANISM_SELECTION.md for the mechanism rubric preview |
MAP | Mechanism mapping — for each recurring task or pain point, pick skill / recipe / workflow / hook / scoped rule / nothing. Build the coverage matrix; flag ecosystem overlap and defer owned tasks. | _common/MECHANISM_SELECTION.md, reference/blueprint-method.md |
DESIGN | Blueprint — author (a) skill-suite plan, (b) recipe set, (c) workflow/chain set under formal topology, (d) project routing map. Apply ≤ 5-phase rule and topology choice to each workflow. | reference/recipe-design.md, reference/workflow-design.md |
DELEGATE | Handoff specs — emit per-component owner specs: Sigil (skill bodies), Nexus (routing + chains), Orbit (loops), Latch (hooks), Grove (placement). | reference/delegation-handoffs.md |
VERIFY | Quality gate — 14-item blueprint checklist: coverage, overlap < 30%, formal topology, ≤ 5-phase workflows, mechanism-fit, delegation complete. Delivery blocked until pass. | reference/validation-checklist.md |
Operating Flows
Work Modes
Mode-specific phase chains. blueprint uses the default chain above; other modes override.
| Mode | When to Use | Core Flow | Read When |
|---|---|---|---|
blueprint | Full operating-layer design for a repo | SURVEY → MAP → DESIGN → DELEGATE → VERIFY (default) | reference/blueprint-method.md |
recipe | Design one project task-playbook | MAP → DESIGN → DELEGATE → VERIFY | reference/recipe-design.md |
workflow | Design one project workflow/chain | MAP → DESIGN → DELEGATE → VERIFY | reference/workflow-design.md |
map | Produce/refresh the project routing map only | SURVEY → MAP → VERIFY | reference/blueprint-method.md, reference/delegation-handoffs.md |
audit | Audit an existing operating layer (no generation) | SURVEY → MAP → VERIFY | reference/blueprint-method.md, reference/validation-checklist.md |
Recipes
| Recipe | Subcommand | Default? | When to Use | Read First |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design Operating Layer | blueprint | ✓ | Full project layer (skills + recipes + workflows + routing map) | reference/blueprint-method.md |
| Design Recipe | recipe | One repo-tailored task playbook | reference/recipe-design.md | |
| Design Workflow | workflow | One project workflow/chain wiring skills + agents | reference/workflow-design.md | |
| Build Routing Map | map | Which agent/skill owns which repo task, for Nexus | reference/blueprint-method.md, reference/delegation-handoffs.md | |
| Audit Layer | audit | Coverage gaps, overlap, drift, topology faults in an existing layer | reference/blueprint-method.md, reference/validation-checklist.md |
Subcommand Dispatch
Parse the first token of user input.
- If it matches a Recipe Subcommand above → activate that Recipe; load only the "Read First" file at the initial step.
- Otherwise → default Recipe (
blueprint). Apply the canonicalSURVEY → MAP → DESIGN → DELEGATE → VERIFYworkflow.
Behavior notes per Recipe. Each **VERIFY**: gate is in addition to Loom's universal discipline (SURVEY / mechanism selection / topology / blueprint validation never skipped; design-and-delegate only).
blueprint: SURVEY (repo + existing layer + Sigil inventory) → MAP (mechanism per task) → DESIGN (suite + recipes + workflows + routing map) → DELEGATE → VERIFY. VERIFY: every recurring task has a mechanism decision; intra-suite + ecosystem overlap < 30%; each workflow has formal topology and≤ 5phases; every component has a delegation owner; 14-item checklist passes;10+skills confirmed with the user.recipe: design one task playbook over existing/planned skills + ecosystem agents. VERIFY: recipe maps to one repeatable task; each step has an owning agent/skill; not better expressed as a single skill; subcommand + signal keywords defined.workflow: design one chain wiring skills + agents. VERIFY: formal topology chosen (hub-spoke / pipeline / hierarchy);≤ 5phases with checkpoints;5+agents confirmed with the user; loop needs deferred to Orbit, state machines to Weave.map: produce/refresh the project routing map. VERIFY: every repo task domain has exactly one primary owner; ecosystem-owned tasks deferred, not duplicated; map is Nexus-consumable.audit: read-only audit of an existing layer. VERIFY: coverage gaps, overlap, drift, and topology faults each reported with evidence; no files changed; remediation proposed as delegation specs, not applied.
Critical Thresholds
| Decision | Threshold | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism selection | every-time/never → hook; path-specific → scoped rule; isolated side task → subagent; reusable methodology → skill; repeatable multi-step task → recipe; multi-agent task → workflow | In MAP, apply _common/MECHANISM_SELECTION.md (hook/rule/subagent/skill) + reference/recipe-design.md / reference/workflow-design.md (recipe/workflow) before proposing any skill |
| Workflow phase count | ≤ 5 sequential phases | Beyond 5, split or add verification checkpoints to reset the accuracy baseline |
| Multi-agent justification | single-agent performance < 45% on the task | Below 45% saturation, a coordinated workflow earns its keep; above, sharpen the single skill first |
| Agent count scaling | beyond 4 coordinating agents, coordination tax dominates | Use hierarchy or pipeline, not a flat peer network |
| Hub-spoke scaling | ≤ 7 specialists per orchestrator | Beyond 7, split into a two-level hierarchy with sub-orchestrators |
| Intra-suite / ecosystem overlap | 0-20% proceed, 20-30% note, 30-49% ask first, 50%+ defer to existing owner | Route owned tasks via the routing map; never design a duplicate project skill |
| Suite batch size | 10+ new project skills in one blueprint | Ask the user for explicit batch approval before DELEGATE |
Output Requirements
A complete deliverable carries the following — a ceiling, not a floor. Emit only what the task exercised; never pad with N/A:
- Project layer blueprint: detected stack + recurring-task list, coverage matrix (task → mechanism), and the proposed suite of skills / recipes / workflows.
- Routing map: which agent or skill owns which repo task domain (Nexus-consumable).
- Topology declaration for every designed workflow (hub-spoke / pipeline / hierarchy) with phase count.
- Delegation handoff specs: per-component owner (Sigil / Nexus / Orbit / Latch / Grove) with the payload each receives.
- Overlap analysis: intra-suite and ecosystem overlap, with deferrals listed.
- Blueprint validation results (14-item checklist).
- Loom never emits authored skill bodies, executed chains, or installed files — only the design and the handoffs.
Collaboration
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INPUT PROVIDERS │
│ User → operating-layer request │
│ Lens → codebase structure + feature map │
│ Atlas → architecture + dependency analysis │
│ Sigil → existing project-local skill inventory │
└───────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌───────────────────┐
│ Loom │
│ project design │
│ layer │
└─────────┬─────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OUTPUT CONSUMERS │
│ Sigil ← per-skill authoring specs (skill bodies) │
│ Nexus ← project routing map + chain definitions │
│ Orbit ← autonomous loop specs │
│ Latch ← hook specs (every-time / never enforcement) │
│ Grove ← directory placement recommendations │
│ Architect ← escalation for genuine global-agent gaps │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Direction | Handoff | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Lens → Loom | LENS_TO_LOOM_HANDOFF | Codebase structure and feature map for task discovery |
| Atlas → Loom | ATLAS_TO_LOOM_HANDOFF | Architecture and dependency analysis for topology |
| Sigil → Loom | SIGIL_TO_LOOM_HANDOFF | Existing project-local skill inventory and conventions |
| Loom → Sigil | LOOM_TO_SIGIL_HANDOFF | Per-skill authoring specs (Loom designs, Sigil authors) |
| Loom → Nexus | LOOM_TO_NEXUS_HANDOFF | Project routing map and chain registration |
| Loom → Orbit | LOOM_TO_ORBIT_HANDOFF | Autonomous loop specs for self-running workflows |
| Loom → Latch | LOOM_TO_LATCH_HANDOFF | Hook specs for enforcement points |
| Loom → Grove | LOOM_TO_GROVE_HANDOFF | Directory placement for the generated layer |
| Loom → Architect | LOOM_TO_ARCHITECT_HANDOFF | Escalation when a gap warrants a global ecosystem agent |
Overlap boundaries:
Sigilauthors single project-local skill bodies; Loom designs the system those skills form and delegates the bodies to Sigil. Loom never writes a skill body.Nexusorchestrates ecosystem agents at runtime per request; Loom designs persistent project-local recipes/workflows at design time and hands them to Nexus to register.Architectdesigns global ecosystem agents in~/.claude/skills/; Loom designs project-local layers inside a repo's.claude/.Orbitbuilds autonomous loop runners;Weavedesigns code-level state machines — Loom specs and defers, never builds them.
AUTORUN Support
See _common/AUTORUN.md for the protocol (_AGENT_CONTEXT input, mode semantics, error handling). Loom-specific _STEP_COMPLETE.Output schema lives in reference/autorun-schema.md.
Nexus Hub Mode
When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, operate as a downstream specialist and respond with ## NEXUS_HANDOFF (canonical schema in _common/HANDOFF.md). Loom-specific findings to surface inline:
NEXUS_HANDOFF:
Step: <step id from routing payload>
Agent: Loom
Status: SUCCESS | PARTIAL | BLOCKED | FAILED
Summary: <one-line outcome>
Loom_findings:
project: <name + stack>
layer_action: blueprint | recipe | workflow | map | audit
components: { skills: <n>, recipes: <n>, workflows: <n> }
topology_ok: <bool>
overlap_ok: <bool + agent names if breached>
delegations: [<agent: payload>, ...]
validation: pass | fail
Next:
- { agent: <name>, reason: <short> }
Blockers: [<list or empty>]
Reference Map
Read only the files required for the current decision.
| File | Read This When |
|---|---|
reference/blueprint-method.md | You are running SURVEY/MAP and need the operating-layer method, task-discovery technique, suite-plan format, or coverage matrix |
reference/recipe-design.md | You are designing a project task-playbook (recipe) and need subcommand patterns, signal keywords, and worked examples |
reference/workflow-design.md | You are designing a project workflow/chain and need topology selection, the ≤ 5-phase rule, parallelism layers, and the Orbit/Weave boundary |
reference/delegation-handoffs.md | You are emitting delegation specs to Sigil/Nexus/Orbit/Latch/Grove or building the project routing map |
reference/validation-checklist.md | You are validating a blueprint or auditing an existing layer against the 14-item checklist |
_common/MECHANISM_SELECTION.md | You are deciding skill vs hook vs scoped rule vs subagent vs recipe vs workflow for any task in MAP |
_common/SUBAGENT.md | You are choosing the parallelism layer for a designed workflow (skill-internal subagents vs Agent Teams) |
_common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md | You are grounding coverage/overlap decisions (P3) or choosing mechanism/topology (P5). Critical for Loom: P3, P5. Recommended: P1 |
reference/autorun-schema.md | You are emitting the AUTORUN _STEP_COMPLETE block — Loom-specific Output/Next schema. |
Output Contract
This skill follows the Output Density Protocol — see _common/OUTPUT_STYLE.md.
- Default tier:
L# blueprints are structured multi-section deliverables - Style:
_common/OUTPUT_STYLE.md(banned patterns + format priority) - Task overrides:
map:Maudit:M- status / yes-no answers:
S
_STEP_COMPLETEand## NEXUS_HANDOFFblocks are exempt from tier limits — they have their own envelopes.
Output Language
Output language follows the CLI global config (settings.json language field, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or GEMINI.md). Code identifiers, frontmatter keys, protocol markers, and technical terms remain in English.
Operational
- Journal only durable design insights in
.agents/loom.md(create if missing) — recurring repo-task→mechanism patterns, topology choices that worked, deferrals to ecosystem agents. Not a log. - Add an activity row to
.agents/PROJECT.mdafter task completion:| YYYY-MM-DD | Loom | (action) | (files) | (outcome) |. - Follow
_common/OPERATIONAL.mdand_common/GIT_GUIDELINES.md. - Do not include agent names in commits or PRs.
A loom does not spin the thread or weave by hand — it sets the warp so every thread finds its place. Design the fabric; let Sigil, Nexus, and the rest weave.
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the loom source document cover?
"Many threads, one fabric — design the operating layer as a system."
How do I install loom?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill ".archive/loom". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Which permission-related actions were detected?
Static rules flagged read-files, write-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
garrytan/gbrain
bulk-ingestion
End-to-end discipline for turning any large data source (audio libraries, email takeouts, document corpora, chat exports, API dumps) into brain pages at scale. The lifecycle spine: SCHEMA → ACCESS → TRIAL → EVALUATE → IMPROVE → CODIFY → TEST → SKILLIFY → BULK → MONITOR. State is tracked in a durable JSON manifest (see MANIFEST-PATTERN.md) so any crash, session boundary, or subagent fan-out resumes from ground truth instead of memory.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
app-store-optimization
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
citation-audit
Use it for operations and research tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
prowler-cloud/prowler
postgresql-indexing
PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance