Best for
- Starting a new project from scratch (full lifecycle)
- Resuming an interrupted project workflow
- Running a focused tactical implementation from existing specs
athola/claude-night-market/plugins/attune/skills/mission-orchestrator/SKILL.md
Orchestrates full project lifecycle by auto-detecting state and routing to the correct phase. Use when starting or resuming a project mid-workflow.
Decision brief
Orchestrates full project lifecycle by auto-detecting state and routing to the correct phase.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill "plugins/attune/skills/mission-orchestrator"Inspect the Agent Skill "mission-orchestrator" from https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market/blob/6720bb5cdeadeea6de6e4786a449126b3d417536/plugins/attune/skills/mission-orchestrator/SKILL.md at commit 6720bb5cdeadeea6de6e4786a449126b3d417536. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review missions route to the existing review skills rather than to attune phase skills:
The plan-to-execute transition uses an interactive review loop instead of a simple checkpoint. Plans are reviewed section by section, revised based on feedback, and must pass a mandatory war-room gate before execution.
plan-review.md: Main orchestrator for the review loop
plan-review.md: Interactive section-by-section review
Wraps the entire attune development lifecycle (brainstorm → specify → plan → execute) into a single mission with automatic state detection, type selection, and phase routing. Follows the "persistent presence lens" pattern from spec-kit:speckit-orchestrator: delegates entirely to…
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
Load mission state fileEvidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 331 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Wraps the entire attune development lifecycle (brainstorm → specify → plan → execute) into a single mission with automatic state detection, type selection, and phase routing. Follows the "persistent presence lens" pattern from spec-kit:speckit-orchestrator: delegates entirely to existing skills via Skill() calls, never re-implements phase logic.
/attune:brainstorm, /attune:specify, etc.)1. State Detection
Scan for existing artifacts (project-brief.md, specification.md, etc.)
|
2. Mission Type Selection
Auto-detect type based on artifacts, or accept user override
|
3. Phase Routing Loop
For each phase in the mission type:
a. Pre-phase validation (check prerequisites)
b. Invoke Skill(attune:{phase-skill})
c. Post-phase artifact check (verify output exists)
d. Post-phase backlog triage (create GitHub issues
for out-of-scope items after brainstorm/specify)
e. Update mission state
f. User checkpoint (skippable with --auto)
g. Error handling via leyline:damage-control
|
4. Completion
All phases complete, final state saved
| Type | Phases | Auto-detected When |
|---|---|---|
full | brainstorm → specify → plan → execute | No artifacts exist |
standard | specify → plan → execute | docs/project-brief.md exists |
tactical | plan → execute | docs/specification.md exists |
quickfix | execute | docs/implementation-plan.md exists |
review | scope → investigate → verify → report | the request names existing software to audit, dogfood, or review |
review is the one type selected from request intent rather than from
artifacts, because a tree of build artifacts looks the same whether the
ask is "ship this" or "audit this". Its check runs first. It produces
reports/<topic>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md and never enters the war-room gate,
which guards a plan-to-execute transition a review mission does not have.
See modules/mission-types.md for full type definitions and custom type support.
| Phase | Skill Invoked | Artifact Produced |
|---|---|---|
| brainstorm | Skill(attune:project-brainstorming) | docs/project-brief.md |
| specify | Skill(attune:project-specification) | docs/specification.md |
| plan | Skill(attune:project-planning) | docs/implementation-plan.md |
| execute | Skill(attune:project-execution) | Implemented code and tests |
Review missions route to the existing review skills rather than to attune phase skills:
| Phase | Skill Invoked | Artifact Produced |
|---|---|---|
| scope | Skill(pensive:tiered-audit) | Tier selection and bounded scope |
| investigate | Skill(imbue:feature-review) plus the pensive:* domain lenses | Raw findings |
| verify | Skill(imbue:proof-of-work) | Evidence references per finding |
| report | Skill(imbue:structured-output) | reports/<topic>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md |
The orchestrator never re-implements phase logic. Each phase is a complete Skill() invocation that handles its own workflow.
Missions delegate execution by default.
Skill(conjure:delegation-core) governs the decision, and its default
posture is on: a phase that reaches execution work hands it to an
external CLI without waiting to be asked.
| Phase | Delegates | Why |
|---|---|---|
| brainstorm | No | Reasoning; the Keep Local clause holds |
| specify | No | Reasoning |
| plan | No | Reasoning |
| execute | Yes, per task | Task execution is the eligible half |
| scope, investigate, verify, report | Report and verify only | Findings are judgment; bulk extraction is not |
The split follows conjure's own line: delegate execution, retain reasoning. A mission phase that is entirely judgment stays local and does not consult the delegator at all.
Two outcomes need handling rather than reporting:
fallback_reason is providers_exhausted: no CLI answered. Say which
were tried, then do the task in the mission itself. This is the
ordinary path on a machine with no CLI installed and it does not fail
the phase.fallback_reason is delegation_disabled: the operator declined.
Do the task locally and do not offer to re-enable it.To run a whole mission without external models, set
CONJURE_DELEGATION=off before invoking it.
Missions persist state to .attune/mission-state.json. On resume:
See modules/mission-state.md for the state schema and recovery protocol.
The plan-to-execute transition uses an interactive review loop instead of a simple checkpoint. Plans are reviewed section by section, revised based on feedback, and must pass a mandatory war-room gate before execution.
Key capabilities:
See modules/plan-review.md for the full protocol.
The orchestrator parses the user's command-args and
free-text at mission start for natural-language trust
signals. Phrases like "ignore scope guard", "ultrathink",
"don't keep asking", and "be autonomous" are recognized
as directive overrides that adjust the constraint
profile without requiring an explicit
--constraints= flag.
Directive overrides win over mission-type defaults but never bypass the Safety Floor (pre-commit hooks, proof-of-work evidence, destructive-operation confirmation, external-facing actions). When a directive is detected, the orchestrator acknowledges it once at mission start and stops asking for the corresponding checkpoints. Repeated approval-seeking after a directive override is itself a workflow bug.
See modules/adaptive-constraints.md "User Directive
Override" section for the parsing table.
Define mission boundaries using the structured template from
references/mission-charter.md. A Mission Charter specifies:
See references/mission-charter.md for the full template and
examples.
Track progress with structured checkpoints using
references/progress-report.md. Generate reports at:
See references/progress-report.md for the template and
checkpoint rhythm guidance.
trust-tier.md when directive overrides are
active.This skill declares progressive_loading: true. To keep the
orchestrator's resident token cost minimal, load only the
subset of modules each mission type actually needs. The
orchestrator itself loads only the four core modules at
mission start; the rest are loaded on-demand when their
phase runs.
| Mission type | Core | Plan-review | Reflexion | Trust and adaptive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
quickfix (execute only) | yes | -- | -- | if directive |
tactical (plan -> execute) | yes | yes | if revising | if directive |
standard (specify -> plan -> execute) | yes | yes | if revising | if directive |
full (brainstorm -> specify -> plan -> execute) | yes | yes | yes | if directive |
review (scope -> investigate -> verify -> report) | yes | -- | if revising | if directive |
Token cost (approximate, computed from wc -w on hub +
loaded modules and converted at ~1.3 tokens per word):
| Mission type | Loaded modules | Approx tokens |
|---|---|---|
quickfix | hub and core (4) | ~4,100 |
tactical | hub, core, and plan-review (9) | ~6,900 |
standard | same as tactical (9) | ~6,900 |
full | hub, core, plan-review, and reflexion (10) | ~7,900 |
The previous load-all pattern brought in roughly 10,100
tokens for every mission, including quickfix runs that
only need the execute phase. With per-type loading, quickfix
is ~60% lighter and the standard / tactical / full paths
save 22-32%.
When a directive override fires, the trust-tier + adaptive-constraints pair adds ~2,200 tokens on top of the mission-type baseline.
Skill(attune:project-brainstorming) - Brainstorm phaseSkill(attune:project-specification) - Specify phaseSkill(attune:project-planning) - Plan phaseSkill(attune:project-execution) - Execute phaseSkill(attune:war-room-checkpoint) - Risk assessment for RED/CRITICAL tasksSkill(leyline:risk-classification) - Task risk classificationSkill(leyline:damage-control) - Error recovery during phasesSkill(conjure:delegation-core) - Default-on delegation of execution work/attune:mission - Invoke this skill/attune:mission --resume - Resume from saved state/attune:mission --type tactical - Override mission type.attune/mission-state.jsonproviders_exhausted result completed locally and reported with
the providers it triedFrequently asked questions
Orchestrates full project lifecycle by auto-detecting state and routing to the correct phase.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill "plugins/attune/skills/mission-orchestrator". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged read-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
Use it for operations and research tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
prowler-cloud/prowler
PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance
brucesongs/kali-claw
Insecure Design (OWASP A06:2025) focuses on security flaws in system architecture and design phases, rather than code implementation-level bugs.