Best for
- Use this skill when the user wants to design, implement, review, or refactor software systems conforming to Clean Architecture principles.
Benknightdark/neo-skills/skills/neo-clean-architecture/SKILL.md
Use this skill when the user wants to design, implement, review, or refactor software systems conforming to Clean Architecture principles. It structures code into Domain, Application, Infrastructure, and Presentation/API layers, enforcing inward-only dependencies. It advocates rich domain models, CQRS, and the Result pattern, operating on technology-neutral concepts without database or framework bindings.
Decision brief
Design and review software systems using Clean Architecture. The core objective is separating concerns based on their rate of change, directing all source code dependencies inward toward the Domain core.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/Benknightdark/neo-skills --skill "skills/neo-clean-architecture"Inspect the Agent Skill "neo-clean-architecture" from https://github.com/Benknightdark/neo-skills/blob/40463275dd97f94cb75b759abe7e232ef8a91ee2/skills/neo-clean-architecture/SKILL.md at commit 40463275dd97f94cb75b759abe7e232ef8a91ee2. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Progress: - [ ] Step 1: Analyze Core & Boundaries (See references/designprinciples.md). - [ ] Step 2: Design Domain Layer (Build entities and value objects; protect invariants). - [ ] Step 3: Design Application Layer (Define use case handlers, CQRS inputs, and repository interfa…
1. Categorize business rules: - Domain Layer: Core rules that would exist even without a computer system. - Application Layer: System orchestration, workflows, and protocols. - Outer Layers (Infrastructure/Presentation): Delivery mechanisms and persistence details. 2. Read desig…
1. Entities: Keep setters private or read-only. 2. Domain Methods: Expose semantic operations (e.g., updateContent(), addTag()) that validate rules inside the entity. 3. Associations: Keep aggregates decoupled by referencing other aggregate roots via ID only.
1. Separate write operations (Commands) from read operations (Queries) using CQRS. 2. Define technology-neutral interfaces (e.g., IUserRepository), keeping database or network specifics out of Application. 3. Wrap use case outcomes in a Result type containing success/failure sta…
1. Infrastructure: Implement interfaces defined in Application. Configure ORM/database mappings, value conversions, and call external services. 2. Presentation/API: Handle transmission protocols (e.g., HTTP, gRPC). Map request payload to Command/Query, dispatch it to Application…
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 95/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 7 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Design and review software systems using Clean Architecture. The core objective is separating concerns based on their rate of change, directing all source code dependencies inward toward the Domain core.
IQueryable) to Application, as it leaks database concerns.Progress:
references/design_principles.md).assets/review_checklist.md to scan code).updateContent(), addTag()) that validate rules inside the entity.IUserRepository), keeping database or network specifics out of Application.# [System Name] Clean Architecture Blueprint
## 1. Domain Layer
* **Entities & Aggregate Roots**:
- `EntityName` (ID-association explanation)
* **Value Objects**:
- `ValueObjectName` (Validation and behavior description)
## 2. Application Layer
* **Use Cases (CQRS / Handlers)**:
- `CreateSomethingCommand` & Handler
- `GetSomethingQuery` & Handler
* **External Interfaces (Gateways / Repositories)**:
- `ISomethingRepository` (Interface methods)
## 3. Infrastructure Layer
* **Persistence Configurations**:
- `SomethingRepository` implementation notes
- Value Object persistence mapping rules
## 4. Presentation / API Layer
* **Contracts (Request/Response)**:
- `CreateSomethingRequest` -> `SomethingResponse`
* **Route & Status Code Mappings**:
- `POST /api/something` -> `201 Created` / `400 Bad Request` / `409 Conflict`
# Clean Architecture Review — [Project Name]
## Health Score: [Score]/10
[Brief architectural health assessment]
## Findings & Recommendations
### 🔴 Critical (Dependency Violation / Invariant Leakage)
* **Location**: `path/to/file.ext#L12-30`
* **Problem**: [Description of the clean architecture violation]
* **Remediation**:
```[language]
// Corrected code snippet
path/to/file.extpath/to/file.extFrequently asked questions
Design and review software systems using Clean Architecture. The core objective is separating concerns based on their rate of change, directing all source code dependencies inward toward the Domain core.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/Benknightdark/neo-skills --skill "skills/neo-clean-architecture". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
brucesongs/kali-claw
Insecure Design (OWASP A06:2025) focuses on security flaws in system architecture and design phases, rather than code implementation-level bugs.
NintendaDev/unikit-ai
Generate and maintain the project's TECHNICAL documentation from its codebase — scans the project structure, tech stack, and module boundaries, then writes a lean README landing page plus detailed topic pages (architecture, modules, setup, build, APIs), only the docs that are relevant. Use whenever the user wants to create, update, or validate documentation of the CODE or the project itself, e.g. "generate documentation", "create docs", "write the README", "update the project docs", "document th
Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills
Create high-quality Claude Code agents from scratch or by adapting existing agents as templates. Use when the user wants to create a new agent, modify agent configurations, build specialized subagents, or design agent architectures. Guides through requirements gathering, template selection, and agent file generation following Anthropic best practices (v2.1.63+).
magnus919/agent-skills
Use this skill to reverse-engineer an existing software system, map its architecture, data flow, privacy posture, coupling, quality characteristics, and feature surface, then produce an evidence-grounded clean-room design document, PRD, or migration plan under new constraints. Use for codebase archaeology, implicit contract extraction, architecture health assessment, or decomposition-readiness analysis. Do not use for greenfield architecture design, direct code review, bug hunting, security audi