Source profileQuality 91/100

PramodDutta/qaskills/seed-skills/offer-comparison-analyzer/SKILL.md

Offer Comparison Analyzer

Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis

Source repository stars
211
Declared platforms
3
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-28
Source checked
2026-08-28

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis

Best for

  • Has multiple job offers to compare
  • Needs to evaluate total compensation
  • Wants to make a data-driven job decision

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexDeclaredSource recordInstall path and trigger
Claude CodeDeclaredSource recordInstall path and trigger
CursorDeclaredSource recordInstall path and trigger
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/PramodDutta/qaskills --skill "seed-skills/offer-comparison-analyzer"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "Offer Comparison Analyzer" from https://github.com/PramodDutta/qaskills/blob/fb3fbec70591bad971dd97c5d9add6eaa99bae18/seed-skills/offer-comparison-analyzer/SKILL.md at commit fb3fbec70591bad971dd97c5d9add6eaa99bae18. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Risk Assessment (Weight: Medium)

    Startup vs. Established: - Funding runway - Market position - Company trajectory - Equity risk (could be worth $0)

    Funding runwayMarket positionCompany trajectory
  2. 02

    Step 1: Define Your Priorities

    Review the “Step 1: Define Your Priorities” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Step 1: Define Your Priorities” source section.
  3. 03

    Step 2: Score Each Factor

    Review the “Step 2: Score Each Factor” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Step 2: Score Each Factor” source section.
  4. 04

    Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score

    Review the “Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score” source section.
  5. 05

    When to Use This Skill

    Use this skill when the user: - Has multiple job offers to compare - Needs to evaluate total compensation - Wants to make a data-driven job decision - Is weighing different opportunities - Mentions: "compare offers", "multiple offers", "which job", "offer comparison", "deciding…

    Has multiple job offers to compareNeeds to evaluate total compensationWants to make a data-driven job decision

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score91/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars211SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility3 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
PramodDutta/qaskills
Skill path
seed-skills/offer-comparison-analyzer/SKILL.md
Commit
fb3fbec70591bad971dd97c5d9add6eaa99bae18
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Offer Comparison Analyzer

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when the user:

  • Has multiple job offers to compare
  • Needs to evaluate total compensation
  • Wants to make a data-driven job decision
  • Is weighing different opportunities
  • Mentions: "compare offers", "multiple offers", "which job", "offer comparison", "deciding between jobs"

Core Capabilities

  • Compare total compensation across offers
  • Evaluate non-monetary factors
  • Create weighted decision frameworks
  • Calculate true offer value
  • Identify hidden costs and benefits
  • Guide the decision-making process

The Comparison Challenge

The Problem: Comparing offers is hard because:

  • Different compensation structures
  • Non-monetary factors matter
  • Hidden benefits and costs
  • Emotional factors cloud judgment
  • Information asymmetry

The Solution: Systematic comparison framework that considers:

  • Total compensation (not just salary)
  • Career growth potential
  • Work-life factors
  • Risk assessment
  • Personal values alignment

Total Compensation Calculator

Components to Include

Cash Compensation:

  • Base salary
  • Signing bonus (one-time)
  • Annual bonus (target %)
  • Commission (for sales roles)
  • Relocation assistance

Equity Compensation:

  • Stock options (value = current price - strike price)
  • RSUs (value = current price × shares)
  • Vesting schedule
  • Refresh grant expectations

Benefits Value:

  • Health insurance (employer contribution)
  • 401(k) match
  • HSA/FSA contributions
  • Life/disability insurance
  • Other insurance benefits

Perks Value:

  • Vacation days (can assign $ value)
  • Remote work (saves commute costs)
  • Professional development budget
  • Equipment/office stipend
  • Meals, gym, etc.

Calculation Template

OFFER A - TOTAL COMPENSATION

CASH
Base Salary:                    $150,000
Signing Bonus (year 1 only):     $25,000
Target Bonus (15%):              $22,500
--------------------------------
Cash Compensation:              $197,500 (year 1)
                               $172,500 (ongoing)

EQUITY
RSU Grant: $200,000 over 4 years
Annual Value:                    $50,000
--------------------------------
Equity Compensation:             $50,000/year

BENEFITS
401(k) Match (4%):               $6,000
Health Insurance:                $15,000 (employer portion)
HSA Contribution:                 $1,000
--------------------------------
Benefits Value:                  $22,000/year

PERKS
Vacation: 20 days (vs 10 standard)
  Extra 10 days × ~$575/day:      $5,750 value
Remote Work Savings:              $3,000 (commute, lunch)
Professional Dev:                 $2,000 budget
--------------------------------
Perks Value:                     $10,750/year

TOTAL YEAR 1:        $280,250
TOTAL ONGOING:       $255,250/year

Side-by-Side Comparison Template

# OFFER COMPARISON

|                          | Company A | Company B | Notes |
|--------------------------|-----------|-----------|-------|
| **CASH**                 |           |           |       |
| Base Salary              | $150,000  | $160,000  | B +$10K |
| Signing Bonus            | $25,000   | $10,000   | A +$15K |
| Target Bonus             | 15%       | 10%       | A +$6.5K |
| **Cash Total (Yr 1)**    | $197,500  | $186,000  | A +$11.5K |
|                          |           |           |       |
| **EQUITY**               |           |           |       |
| Grant Value (4yr)        | $200,000  | $300,000  | B +$100K |
| Annual Equity            | $50,000   | $75,000   | B +$25K |
|                          |           |           |       |
| **BENEFITS**             |           |           |       |
| 401(k) Match             | 4%        | 6%        | B +$3.2K |
| Health Insurance         | Good      | Premium   | B better |
| PTO                      | 20 days   | Unlimited | Varies |
|                          |           |           |       |
| **TOTAL COMP (Yr 1)**    | $280,250  | $285,000  | B +$4.7K |
| **TOTAL COMP (Ongoing)** | $255,250  | $275,000  | B +$19.7K |

Non-Monetary Factor Framework

Career Growth (Weight: High)

Questions to Consider:

  • Which role offers more learning?
  • Which company/brand helps future job search?
  • Which has better promotion track?
  • Which offers more scope/responsibility?
  • Which manager will develop you more?

Scoring:

Company A: Growth Score
- Learning opportunity: 8/10
- Brand/resume value: 7/10
- Promotion potential: 6/10
- Scope: 8/10
Average: 7.25/10

Company B: Growth Score
- Learning opportunity: 7/10
- Brand/resume value: 9/10
- Promotion potential: 8/10
- Scope: 7/10
Average: 7.75/10

Work-Life Balance (Weight: Personal)

Factors:

  • Expected hours
  • Remote/hybrid flexibility
  • Vacation usage culture
  • On-call requirements
  • Travel requirements
  • Commute time

Team & Culture (Weight: High)

Factors:

  • Manager quality (crucial!)
  • Team health/dynamics
  • Company culture fit
  • DEI considerations
  • Company stability/growth
  • Values alignment

Risk Assessment (Weight: Medium)

Startup vs. Established:

  • Funding runway
  • Market position
  • Company trajectory
  • Equity risk (could be worth $0)

Questions:

  • What happens if company struggles?
  • How stable is this role?
  • What's the severance policy?

Weighted Decision Matrix

Step 1: Define Your Priorities

Factor                  Weight
------------------------------------
Total Compensation       25%
Career Growth            25%
Work-Life Balance        20%
Team & Culture           20%
Location/Commute         10%
------------------------------------
Total:                   100%

Step 2: Score Each Factor

                    Company A   Company B
Factor              Score (1-10)
------------------------------------
Compensation        7           8
Career Growth       7           8
Work-Life           8           6
Team & Culture      9           7
Location            8           5

Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score

Company A:
(7 × 0.25) + (7 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.20) + (9 × 0.20) + (8 × 0.10)
= 1.75 + 1.75 + 1.60 + 1.80 + 0.80
= 7.70

Company B:
(8 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.25) + (6 × 0.20) + (7 × 0.20) + (5 × 0.10)
= 2.00 + 2.00 + 1.20 + 1.40 + 0.50
= 7.10

Result: Company A scores higher (7.70 vs 7.10)

Red Flags to Watch

In the Offer

  • ❌ Vague bonus language ("up to 20%")
  • ❌ Equity with no liquidity path
  • ❌ High base but no equity (at startup)
  • ❌ Cliff longer than 1 year
  • ❌ Vesting acceleration absent
  • ❌ Non-compete restrictions
  • ❌ Verbal promises not in writing

About the Company

  • ❌ High turnover (check LinkedIn)
  • ❌ Recent layoffs or reorgs
  • ❌ Manager seems checked out
  • ❌ Glassdoor patterns in bad reviews
  • ❌ Funding concerns
  • ❌ Unclear path to profitability

About the Role

  • ❌ Vague responsibilities
  • ❌ Role seems to change during interviews
  • ❌ Red flags in why position is open
  • ❌ No growth path discussed
  • ❌ Unrealistic expectations set

Questions to Ask Yourself

The Gut Check

  • Which offer excites me more?
  • Which would I regret not taking?
  • Which aligns with my 5-year goals?
  • Which would I brag about to friends?

The Monday Morning Test

  • Which job do I want to wake up for?
  • Which team do I want to work with?
  • Which problems do I want to solve?

The Learning Test

  • Where will I grow more?
  • Which skills will I develop?
  • Which looks better on my resume in 3 years?

The Risk Test

  • What's the downside of each?
  • Which failure would I regret more?
  • What's my backup plan for each?

Output Format

When comparing offers:

# JOB OFFER COMPARISON

## Offers Being Compared
- **Offer A:** [Role] at [Company]
- **Offer B:** [Role] at [Company]

## Total Compensation Comparison

| Component | Offer A | Offer B | Difference |
|-----------|---------|---------|------------|
| Base | $X | $X | |
| Bonus | $X | $X | |
| Equity (annual) | $X | $X | |
| Benefits | $X | $X | |
| **Year 1 Total** | $X | $X | |
| **Ongoing Total** | $X | $X | |

## Non-Monetary Comparison

| Factor | Offer A | Offer B | Notes |
|--------|---------|---------|-------|
| Career Growth | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Work-Life | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Team/Culture | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Risk Level | X/10 | X/10 | |

## Weighted Analysis

Using your priorities:
- Offer A Score: X.XX
- Offer B Score: X.XX

## Key Differences
1. [Key difference 1]
2. [Key difference 2]
3. [Key difference 3]

## Recommendation

Based on your stated priorities of [X, Y, Z], **Offer [A/B]** appears to be the stronger choice because:
- [Reason 1]
- [Reason 2]
- [Reason 3]

## Things to Clarify Before Deciding
- [ ] [Question for Company A]
- [ ] [Question for Company B]

## Negotiation Opportunities
- [Opportunity 1]
- [Opportunity 2]

Comparison Checklist

  • ✅ Calculated total comp (not just base)
  • ✅ Included equity with realistic valuation
  • ✅ Factored in benefits value
  • ✅ Considered tax implications
  • ✅ Weighted non-monetary factors
  • ✅ Assessed career growth potential
  • ✅ Evaluated team and manager quality
  • ✅ Checked company stability/risk
  • ✅ Aligned with personal priorities
  • ✅ Gut-checked the decision

For QA and Testing Roles

When comparing QA offers, weigh the automation trajectory as hard as the pay: a role where you build frameworks compounds your market value; a role executing someone else's manual suites decays it. Ask each company: what percent of QA time is automation, who owns the framework, is there a path from QA to SDET or quality platform work, and what happens to testers when AI tooling lands. A 10% higher salary for a manual-only role is usually the worse offer over a three-year horizon.


License and attribution

Adapted for QA professionals by The Testing Academy (thetestingacademy) from Resume Skills. The original work is used under the MIT License, reproduced in full below. Modifications to this file are released under the same license.

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2026 Resume Skills

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the Offer Comparison Analyzer source document cover?

Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis

How do I install Offer Comparison Analyzer?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/PramodDutta/qaskills --skill "seed-skills/offer-comparison-analyzer". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which Agent platforms does the source record declare?

The pinned source record declares support for: codex, claude code, cursor.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing