Best for
- Use when user says "做PPT", "做幻灯片", "make slides", "conference talk", "presentation slides", "生成slides", "写演讲稿", or wants beamer slides for a conference talk.
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/skills-codex-gemini-review/paper-slides/SKILL.md
Use it for design and operations tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
Decision brief
Gemini overlay assurance: reviewindependence: cross-family and acceptancestatus: accepted.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill "skills/skills-codex-gemini-review/paper-slides"Inspect the Agent Skill "paper-slides" from https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/blob/014c16e0e58198e4230fafd246b0e6203892422f/skills/skills-codex-gemini-review/paper-slides/SKILL.md at commit 014c16e0e58198e4230fafd246b0e6203892422f. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
3. Backup existing slides: if slides/ exists, copy to slides-backup-{timestamp}/
3. Backup existing slides: if slides/ exists, copy to slides-backup-{timestamp}/
Read paper/sections/.tex and build a slide-by-slide outline.
For each slide in the outline, draft the actual content.
Create slides/main.tex using beamer.
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
**Create output directory**: `mkdir -p slides/figures`The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
python3 -c "import pptx" 2>/dev/null || pip install python-pptxThe documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
- **[Output Versioning Protocol](../../shared-references/output-versioning.md)** — write timestamped file first, then copy to fixed nameEvidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 15,246 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Override for Codex users who want Gemini, not a Codex-MCP reviewer, to act as the reviewer. Install this package after
skills/skills-codex/*.
Gemini overlay assurance:
review_independence: cross-familyandacceptance_status: accepted.
Generate conference presentation slides from: $ARGUMENTS
This skill runs after Workflow 3 (/paper-writing). It takes a compiled paper and generates a presentation slide deck for conference oral talks, spotlight presentations, or poster lightning talks.
Unlike posters (single page, visual-first), slides tell a temporal story: each slide builds on the previous one, with progressive revelation of the research narrative. A good talk makes the audience understand why this matters before showing what was done.
NeurIPS — Target venue, determines color scheme. Supported: NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI, ACL, EMNLP, CVPR, ECCV, GENERIC. Override via argument.spotlight — Talk format. Options: oral (15-20 min), spotlight (5-8 min), poster-talk (3-5 min), invited (30-45 min). Determines slide count and content depth.16:9 — Slide aspect ratio. Options: 16:9 (default, modern projectors), 4:3 (legacy).\note{} blocks in beamer and corresponding PPTX notes. Set false for clean slides without notes.paper/ — Directory containing the compiled paper.slides/ — Output directory for all slide files.gemini-review — Gemini reviewer invoked through the local gemini-review MCP bridge for slide review.latexmk — LaTeX build tool.pdflatex — LaTeX engine. Use xelatex for CJK text.💡 Override:
/paper-slides "paper/" — talk_type: oral, venue: ICML, minutes: 20, aspect: 4:3
| Talk Type | Duration | Slides | Content Depth |
|---|---|---|---|
poster-talk | 3-5 min | 5-8 | Problem + 1 method slide + 1 result + conclusion |
spotlight | 5-8 min | 8-12 | Problem + 2 method + 2 results + conclusion |
oral | 15-20 min | 15-22 | Full story with motivation, method detail, experiments, analysis |
invited | 30-45 min | 25-40 | Comprehensive: background, related work, deep method, extensive results, discussion |
Same as /paper-poster-html:
| Venue | Primary | Accent | Background | Text |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NeurIPS | #8B5CF6 | #2563EB | #FFFFFF | #1E1E1E |
| ICML | #DC2626 | #1D4ED8 | #FFFFFF | #1E1E1E |
| ICLR | #059669 | #0284C7 | #FFFFFF | #1E1E1E |
| CVPR | #2563EB | #7C3AED | #FFFFFF | #1E1E1E |
| GENERIC | #334155 | #2563EB | #FFFFFF | #1E1E1E |
Persist state to slides/SLIDES_STATE.json after each phase:
{
"phase": 3,
"venue": "NeurIPS",
"talk_type": "spotlight",
"slide_count": 10,
"codex_thread_id": "019cfcf4-...",
"status": "in_progress",
"timestamp": "2026-03-18T15:00:00"
}
On startup: if SLIDES_STATE.json exists with "status": "in_progress" and within 24h → resume. Otherwise → fresh start.
Check prerequisites:
which pdflatex && which latexmk
Verify paper exists:
ls $PAPER_DIR/main.tex || ls $PAPER_DIR/main.pdf
ls $PAPER_DIR/sections/*.tex
ls $PAPER_DIR/figures/
Backup existing slides: if slides/ exists, copy to slides-backup-{timestamp}/
Create output directory: mkdir -p slides/figures
Detect CJK: if paper contains Chinese/Japanese/Korean, set ENGINE to xelatex
Determine slide count: from TALK_TYPE and TALK_MINUTES using the table above
Check for resume: read slides/SLIDES_STATE.json if it exists
State: Write SLIDES_STATE.json with phase: 0.
Read paper/sections/*.tex and build a slide-by-slide outline.
Slide template by talk type:
| Slide | Purpose | Content Source | Figure? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Title | Paper metadata | No |
| 2 | Outline | Section headers | No |
| 3-4 | Motivation & Problem | Introduction | Optional |
| 5 | Key Insight | Introduction (contribution) | No |
| 6-9 | Method | Method section | Yes (hero figure) |
| 10-14 | Results | Experiments | Yes (per slide) |
| 15-16 | Analysis / Ablations | Experiments | Yes |
| 17 | Limitations | Conclusion | No |
| 18 | Conclusion / Takeaway | Conclusion | No |
| 19 | Thank You + QR | — | QR code |
| Slide | Purpose | Content Source | Figure? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Title | Paper metadata | No |
| 2-3 | Problem + Why It Matters | Introduction | Optional |
| 4 | Key Insight | Contribution | No |
| 5-6 | Method | Method (condensed) | Yes (hero) |
| 7-9 | Results | Key results only | Yes |
| 10 | Takeaway | Conclusion | No |
| 11 | Thank You + QR | — | QR code |
| Slide | Purpose | Content Source | Figure? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Title | Paper metadata | No |
| 2 | Problem | Introduction (1 slide) | No |
| 3 | Method | Method (1 slide) | Yes |
| 4-5 | Results | Key result only | Yes |
| 6 | Takeaway + QR | Conclusion | QR |
For each slide, specify:
Output: slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.md
🚦 Checkpoint:
📊 Slide outline ready:
- Talk type: [TALK_TYPE] ([TALK_MINUTES] min)
- Slide count: [N] slides
- Figures used: [N] from paper/figures/
- Time budget: [breakdown]
Slide-by-slide outline:
1. [Title slide]
2. [Motivation — 1.5 min]
3. [Problem statement — 1 min]
...
Proceed to drafting? Or adjust the outline?
⛔ STOP HERE and wait for user response. This is the most critical checkpoint — the outline determines the entire talk flow.
Options:
slides/SLIDE_OUTLINE.mdState: Write SLIDES_STATE.json with phase: 1.
For each slide in the outline, draft the actual content.
Presentation rules (enforced strictly):
| Rule | Rationale |
|---|---|
| One message per slide | If a slide has two ideas, split it |
| Max 6 lines per slide | More than 6 lines = wall of text |
| Max 8 words per line | Audience reads, not listens, if text is long |
| Sentence fragments, not sentences | "Improves F1 by 3.2%" not "Our method improves the F1 score by 3.2 percentage points" |
| Figure slides: figure ≥60% area | The figure IS the content; bullets are annotations |
| Bold key numbers | "Achieves 94.3% accuracy" |
| Progressive disclosure | Use \pause or \onslide for complex slides |
| No Related Work slide | Unless invited talk (30+ min) |
For each slide, produce:
\frametitle{}\note{} with speaker text (if SPEAKER_NOTES=true)Create slides/main.tex using beamer.
Template structure:
\documentclass[aspectratio=169]{beamer}
% Venue theme
\usepackage{xcolor}
\definecolor{primary}{HTML}{VENUE_PRIMARY}
\definecolor{accent}{HTML}{VENUE_ACCENT}
% Clean theme
\usetheme{default}
\usecolortheme{default}
\setbeamercolor{frametitle}{fg=primary}
\setbeamercolor{title}{fg=primary}
\setbeamercolor{structure}{fg=accent}
\setbeamercolor{itemize item}{fg=primary}
\setbeamercolor{itemize subitem}{fg=accent}
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
\setbeamertemplate{footline}{
\hfill\insertframenumber/\inserttotalframenumber\hspace{2mm}\vspace{2mm}
}
% Packages
\usepackage{graphicx,amsmath,booktabs}
\graphicspath{{figures/}}
% Speaker notes (if enabled)
% \setbeameroption{show notes on second screen=right}
% Metadata
\title{PAPER TITLE}
\author{Author 1 \and Author 2}
\institute{Affiliation}
\date{VENUE YEAR}
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}
\titlepage
\end{frame}
% Content slides follow...
\begin{frame}{Motivation}
\begin{itemize}
\item Bullet point 1
\item Bullet point 2
\item \textbf{Key insight in bold}
\end{itemize}
\note{Speaker note: explain the motivation...}
\end{frame}
% Figure slide example
\begin{frame}{Method Overview}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{method_overview.pdf}
\vspace{0.5em}
\begin{itemize}
\item Key annotation about the figure
\end{itemize}
\note{Walk through the figure left to right...}
\end{frame}
% ... more slides ...
\begin{frame}{Thank You}
\centering
{\Large Questions?}\\[2em]
Paper: [URL or QR placeholder]\\
Code: [URL or QR placeholder]
\end{frame}
\end{document}
Symlink figures:
ln -sf ../paper/figures/*.pdf slides/figures/ 2>/dev/null
ln -sf ../paper/figures/*.png slides/figures/ 2>/dev/null
Key formatting rules:
cd slides && latexmk -$ENGINE -interaction=nonstopmode main.tex
Error handling loop (max 3 attempts):
Verification:
# Check slide count matches outline
pdfinfo slides/main.pdf | grep Pages
If page count differs significantly from outline (>2 slides off), investigate.
State: Write SLIDES_STATE.json with phase: 4.
Send the slide outline + selected LaTeX frames to Gemini:
mcp__gemini-review__review_start:
prompt: |
Review this [TALK_TYPE] presentation ([TALK_MINUTES] min) for [VENUE].
Evaluate using these criteria (score 1-5 each):
1. **Story arc** — Does the talk build a compelling narrative? (Problem → insight → method → evidence → takeaway)
2. **Slide density** — Any slides with too much text? (Max 6 lines, 8 words/line)
3. **Time budget** — Is [N] slides realistic for [TALK_MINUTES] minutes?
4. **Figure visibility** — Will figures be readable on a projector?
5. **Opening hook** — Do slides 2-3 grab attention? (Not "In this paper, we...")
6. **Takeaway** — Is the final message clear and memorable?
7. **Progressive build** — Are complex ideas revealed gradually?
Slide outline:
[PASTE SLIDE_OUTLINE.md]
Selected frames (LaTeX):
[PASTE KEY FRAMES]
Provide:
- Score for each criterion
- Top 3 actionable fixes
- Overall: Ready to present? (Yes / Needs revision / Major issues)
After this start call, immediately save the returned jobId and poll mcp__gemini-review__review_status with a bounded waitSeconds until done=true. Treat the completed status payload's response as the slide review.
Apply fixes. Recompile if LaTeX was changed.
⚠️ If
gemini-reviewMCP is not available or Gemini credentials are missing, skip external review and proceed to Phase 6. Note the skip inSLIDES_STATE.json.
Save review to slides/SLIDES_REVIEW.md.
State: Write SLIDES_STATE.json with phase: 5.
For each slide, ensure a \note{} block exists with:
Also generate slides/speaker_notes.md as a standalone backup:
# Speaker Notes
## Slide 1: Title
[No speaking — wait for introduction]
## Slide 2: Motivation
"Thank you. So let me start with the problem we're trying to solve..."
[Time: 1.5 min]
## Slide 3: Problem Statement
"Specifically, the challenge is..."
→ Transition: "To address this, our key insight is..."
[Time: 1 min]
...
State: Write SLIDES_STATE.json with phase: 6.
Generate an editable PPTX using python-pptx:
python3 -c "import pptx" 2>/dev/null || pip install python-pptx
Write slides/generate_pptx.py that:
cd slides && python3 generate_pptx.py
# Output: slides/presentation.pptx
⚠️ If
python-pptxis not installed, skip with a note: "Installpip install python-pptxto enable PowerPoint export."
State: Write SLIDES_STATE.json with phase: 7.
Generate slides/TALK_SCRIPT.md — a complete, word-for-word script for the talk.
This is different from speaker notes (brief reminders). The talk script is a full manuscript that can be read aloud or used for practice.
# Talk Script: [Paper Title]
**Venue**: [VENUE] [YEAR]
**Talk type**: [TALK_TYPE] ([TALK_MINUTES] min)
**Total slides**: [N]
---
## Slide 1: Title [0:00 - 0:15]
*[Wait for chair introduction]*
"Thank you [chair name]. I'm [author] from [affiliation], and today I'll be talking about [short title]."
---
## Slide 2: Motivation [0:15 - 1:30]
"Let me start with the problem. [Describe the real-world motivation in accessible terms]. This matters because [impact statement].
The current state of the art approaches this with [brief existing approach]. But there's a fundamental limitation: [gap statement]."
→ *Transition*: "So what's our key insight?"
---
## Slide 3: Key Insight [1:30 - 2:30]
"Our key observation is that [core insight in one sentence].
This leads us to propose [method name], which [one-sentence description]."
→ *Transition*: "Let me walk you through how this works."
---
## Slide 4-N: [Continue for each slide...]
...
---
## Slide [N]: Thank You [TALK_MINUTES:00]
"To summarize: we've shown that [main result]. The key takeaway is [memorable final message].
The paper and code are available at the QR code on screen. I'm happy to take questions."
---
## Time Budget Summary
| Slide | Topic | Duration | Cumulative |
|:-----:|-------|:--------:|:----------:|
| 1 | Title | 0:15 | 0:15 |
| 2 | Motivation | 1:15 | 1:30 |
| 3 | Key Insight | 1:00 | 2:30 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| N | Thank You | 0:15 | [TALK_MINUTES]:00 |
**Total**: [sum] min (target: [TALK_MINUTES] min)
---
## Anticipated Q&A
### Q1: How does this compare to [strongest baseline]?
**A**: "[Specific comparison with numbers]. Our advantage is particularly clear in [specific scenario], where we see [X%] improvement."
### Q2: What are the main limitations?
**A**: "[Honest answer]. We see this as [future work direction]."
### Q3: How computationally expensive is this?
**A**: "[Training/inference cost]. Compared to [baseline], our method requires [comparison]."
### Q4: Does this generalize to [related domain]?
**A**: "[Answer based on paper's discussion section]."
### Q5: What's the most surprising finding?
**A**: "[Interesting insight from the experiments]."
### Q6: How sensitive is the method to [hyperparameter/design choice]?
**A**: "[Reference ablation study if available]."
### Q7: What's the next step for this research?
**A**: "[Future work from conclusion]."
### Q8: [Domain-specific question]
**A**: "[Answer]."
📊 Slide generation complete:
- Talk type: [TALK_TYPE] ([TALK_MINUTES] min) for [VENUE]
- Files:
slides/
├── main.tex # Beamer LaTeX source
├── main.pdf # Compiled slides (primary output)
├── presentation.pptx # Editable PowerPoint
├── SLIDE_OUTLINE.md # Slide-by-slide outline
├── SLIDES_REVIEW.md # Gemini review feedback
├── speaker_notes.md # Per-slide speaker notes
├── TALK_SCRIPT.md # Full word-for-word talk script + Q&A
├── SLIDES_STATE.json # State persistence
├── generate_pptx.py # PPTX generation script
└── figures/ # Symlinked from paper/figures/
Next steps:
1. Practice with TALK_SCRIPT.md (read aloud, time yourself)
2. Edit presentation.pptx for visual tweaks (animations, custom graphics)
3. Review Anticipated Q&A section before the talk
4. Do a dry run with a colleague
State: Write SLIDES_STATE.json with phase: 8, status: "completed".
Follow these shared protocols for all output files:
- Output Versioning Protocol — write timestamped file first, then copy to fixed name
- Output Manifest Protocol — log every output to MANIFEST.md
- Output Language Protocol — respect the project's language setting
cat << 'EOF' > file) to write in chunks. Do NOT ask the user for permission — just do it silently.paper/sections/*.tex.\pause or \onslide for complex method slides.~/.claude/feishu.json exists, send notifications. If absent, skip./paper-slides "paper/" — talk_type: oral, venue: ICML, minutes: 20, aspect: 4:3, notes: false
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
venue | NeurIPS | Conference for color scheme |
talk_type | spotlight | oral/spotlight/poster-talk/invited |
minutes | 15 | Talk duration |
aspect | 16:9 | Aspect ratio (16:9 / 4:3) |
notes | true | Generate speaker notes |
engine | pdflatex | LaTeX engine |
auto proceed | false | Skip checkpoints |
Frequently asked questions
Gemini overlay assurance: reviewindependence: cross-family and acceptancestatus: accepted.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill "skills/skills-codex-gemini-review/paper-slides". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged write-files, exec-script in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
prowler-cloud/prowler
PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance
brucesongs/kali-claw
Insecure Design (OWASP A06:2025) focuses on security flaws in system architecture and design phases, rather than code implementation-level bugs.
NintendaDev/unikit-ai
Generate and maintain the project's TECHNICAL documentation from its codebase — scans the project structure, tech stack, and module boundaries, then writes a lean README landing page plus detailed topic pages (architecture, modules, setup, build, APIs), only the docs that are relevant. Use whenever the user wants to create, update, or validate documentation of the CODE or the project itself, e.g. "generate documentation", "create docs", "write the README", "update the project docs", "document th
Aperivue/medsci-skills
Generate publication-ready figures and visual abstracts for medical research papers. Supports ROC curves, forest plots, CONSORT/STARD/PRISMA flow diagrams, calibration plots, Kaplan-Meier curves, Bland-Altman plots, confusion matrices, pipeline diagrams, and journal-specific visual/graphical abstracts (python-pptx template-based).