Best for
- When conducting security assessments that involve performing alert triage with elastic siem
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siem/SKILL.md
Perform systematic alert triage in Elastic Security SIEM to rapidly classify, prioritize, and investigate security alerts for SOC operations.
Decision brief
Perform systematic alert triage in Elastic Security SIEM to rapidly classify, prioritize, and investigate security alerts for SOC operations.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill "cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siem"Inspect the Agent Skill "performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siem" from https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/blob/7f71af8164e8f5a775253417aa405b5d9d063faf/cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siem/SKILL.md at commit 7f71af8164e8f5a775253417aa405b5d9d063faf. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
When viewing an alert in Elastic Security, review the alert details panel:
When viewing an alert in Elastic Security, review the alert details panel:
Review the “Step 2: Context Gathering (3 minutes)” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Check indicators against threat intelligence:
Review the “Step 4: Classification Decision (2 minutes)” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 91/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 52 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Alert triage in Elastic Security is the systematic process of reviewing, classifying, and prioritizing security alerts to determine which represent genuine threats. Elastic's AI-driven Attack Discovery feature can triage hundreds of alerts down to discrete attack chains, but skilled analyst triage remains essential. A structured triage workflow typically takes 5-10 minutes per alert cluster using Elastic's built-in tools.
When viewing an alert in Elastic Security, review the alert details panel:
Alert Details Panel:
- Rule Name and Description
- Severity and Risk Score
- MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
- Host and User Context
- Process Tree (for endpoint alerts)
- Timeline of related events
| Field | Purpose | ECS Field |
|---|---|---|
| Rule severity | Initial priority assessment | kibana.alert.severity |
| Risk score | Quantified threat level | kibana.alert.risk_score |
| Host name | Affected system | host.name |
| User name | Affected identity | user.name |
| Process name | Executing process | process.name |
| Source IP | Origin of activity | source.ip |
| Destination IP | Target of activity | destination.ip |
| MITRE tactic | Attack stage | threat.tactic.name |
FROM logs-endpoint.events.*
| WHERE host.name == "affected-host" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 1 HOUR
| STATS count = COUNT(*) BY event.category, event.action
| SORT count DESC
FROM logs-*
| WHERE user.name == "suspicious-user" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 24 HOURS
| STATS count = COUNT(*), unique_hosts = COUNT_DISTINCT(host.name) BY event.category
| SORT count DESC
FROM .alerts-security.alerts-default
| WHERE source.ip == "10.0.0.50" AND @timestamp > NOW() - 24 HOURS
| STATS alert_count = COUNT(*) BY kibana.alert.rule.name, kibana.alert.severity
| SORT alert_count DESC
FROM logs-system.auth-*
| WHERE source.ip == "10.0.0.50" AND event.outcome == "success"
| STATS login_count = COUNT(*), hosts = COUNT_DISTINCT(host.name) BY user.name
| WHERE hosts > 3
Check indicators against threat intelligence:
FROM logs-ti_*
| WHERE threat.indicator.ip == "203.0.113.50"
| KEEP threat.indicator.type, threat.indicator.provider, threat.indicator.confidence, threat.feed.name
FROM logs-endpoint.events.file-*
| WHERE file.hash.sha256 == "abc123..."
| STATS occurrences = COUNT(*) BY host.name, file.path, user.name
| Classification | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| True Positive | Confirmed malicious activity | Escalate to incident, begin containment |
| Benign True Positive | Expected behavior matching rule | Document in alert notes, acknowledge |
| False Positive | Rule triggered on benign activity | Mark as false positive, create tuning task |
| Needs Investigation | Insufficient data for determination | Assign for deeper investigation |
For each triaged alert, document:
Elastic Security includes 1000+ pre-built detection rules organized by:
{
"name": "Multiple Failed Logins Followed by Success",
"type": "threshold",
"query": "event.category:authentication AND event.outcome:failure",
"threshold": {
"field": ["source.ip", "user.name"],
"value": 5,
"cardinality": [
{
"field": "user.name",
"value": 3
}
]
},
"severity": "high",
"risk_score": 73,
"threat": [
{
"framework": "MITRE ATT&CK",
"tactic": {
"id": "TA0006",
"name": "Credential Access"
},
"technique": [
{
"id": "T1110",
"name": "Brute Force"
}
]
}
]
}
Elastic's Attack Discovery automatically:
| Risk Score | Severity | Asset Criticality | Response SLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Critical | High | 15 minutes |
| 70-89 | High | High | 30 minutes |
| 70-89 | High | Medium | 1 hour |
| 50-69 | Medium | Any | 4 hours |
| 21-49 | Low | Any | 8 hours |
| 1-20 | Informational | Any | 24 hours |
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Time to Triage (MTTT) | < 10 minutes | Time from alert creation to classification |
| False Positive Rate | < 30% | False positives / total alerts |
| Escalation Rate | 10-20% | Escalated alerts / total alerts |
| Alert Coverage | > 80% | Triaged alerts / generated alerts per shift |
| Reclassification Rate | < 5% | Changed classifications / total classified |
Frequently asked questions
Perform systematic alert triage in Elastic Security SIEM to rapidly classify, prioritize, and investigate security alerts for SOC operations.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill "cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/performing-alert-triage-with-elastic-siem". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
oaustegard/claude-skills
Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre
dancingteeth/unified-code-review
Risk-first code review for PRs and branch audits: blast-radius triage, agent-authored discipline (tests first, intent evidence), call-graph pincer for integration defects between modules, then structural code-judo bar. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing agent-written diffs, catching rubber-stamp green CI, or wiring bugs single-file review misses. Prefer over structure-only thermo-nuclear review alone. Do not use for unrelated coding tasks or as an always-on rule.
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills
Build long-running .NET background services with `BackgroundService`, Generic Host, graceful shutdown, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns suited to workers and daemons.
PaulRBerg/agent-skills
Create/scaffold/init a project-local agent skill under `.agents/skills` in an ordinary repository; defer to repository instructions that define a source catalog and lifecycle.