Best for
- You just wrote a plan artifact (.claude/plans/.plan.md from /plan) and
- The user should point at what to change: reviewing designs, comparisons,
- The user asks for /plan-canvas, a visual review, or "open it in the browser".
affaan-m/ECC/skills/plan-canvas/SKILL.md
Open plans and HTML artifacts in a local browser canvas where the human annotates elements, chats, and approves or requests changes without leaving the page. Use when presenting a plan for review, or when feedback like "move this, change that" is easier pointed at than typed.
Decision brief
Review loop for plans and visual artifacts: you write the artifact, the human reviews it in the browser — annotating the exact element they mean, chatting, and delivering an Approve plan / Request changes verdict — while you block on a single CLI call that returns their feedback…
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/plan-canvas"Inspect the Agent Skill "plan-canvas" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/d8409a4b0813771235555e32e3d8046a73988bfa/skills/plan-canvas/SKILL.md at commit d8409a4b0813771235555e32e3d8046a73988bfa. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “plan is confirmed — begin implementation” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Do NOT use for: code review of diffs (/code-review), running web apps, or remote URLs. The canvas serves local artifact files only.
Invoke the CLI as ecc-plan-canvas — the bin shipped by the ecc-universal package (on PATH after a global/plugin install; node "$CLAUDEPLUGINROOT/scripts/plan-canvas.js" also works for plugin installs). Run it from the project you are reviewing in; it works from any working direc…
ecc-plan-canvas open .claude/plans/feature.plan.md
Review the “2. Block until the human responds. Leave running; re-run if interrupted:” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
Invoke the CLI as `ecc-plan-canvas` — the bin shipped by the `ecc-universal`The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
any agent that can run a shell command and read stdout drives it the same wayThe documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
Edit the artifact file to revise — the canvas live-reloads on save. NeverThe documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
*Revision loop** — feedback arrives, you edit the file, reply, keep listening:Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 90/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 242,963 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Review loop for plans and visual artifacts: you write the artifact, the human reviews it in the browser — annotating the exact element they mean, chatting, and delivering an Approve plan / Request changes verdict — while you block on a single CLI call that returns their feedback as JSON.
Inspired by lavish-axi; rebuilt
ECC-native around the /plan confirmation gate, with zero dependencies.
.claude/plans/*.plan.md from /plan) and
need the CONFIRM/approve decision — the canvas verdict replaces a typed
"yes/proceed"..md / .html artifact./plan-canvas, a visual review, or "open it in the browser".Do NOT use for: code review of diffs (/code-review), running web apps, or
remote URLs. The canvas serves local artifact files only.
Invoke the CLI as ecc-plan-canvas — the bin shipped by the ecc-universal
package (on PATH after a global/plugin install; node "$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/plan-canvas.js"
also works for plugin installs). Run it from the project you are reviewing in;
it works from any working directory. It manages a detached loopback server
(127.0.0.1:4517) shared by all sessions, keyed by artifact path — no session
ids to track.
The workflow is a plain CLI-plus-JSON loop, so it is model- and harness-agnostic:
any agent that can run a shell command and read stdout drives it the same way
(Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, OpenCode, Copilot). Trigger it however your
harness surfaces skills — e.g. /plan-canvas in Claude Code, $plan-canvas in
Codex — or just run the ecc-plan-canvas commands directly.
# 1. Open the artifact in the user's browser (returns immediately)
ecc-plan-canvas open .claude/plans/feature.plan.md
# 2. Block until the human responds. Leave running; re-run if interrupted:
# queued feedback is never lost.
ecc-plan-canvas await .claude/plans/feature.plan.md
Feedback only reaches you while an await is actually parked on the session.
If your turn ends with nothing listening, the message sits in the queue and,
from the human's side of the glass, sending appears to do nothing at all.
So run await as a background task when your harness supports one (in
Claude Code, a Bash call with run_in_background: true). It exits the moment
feedback arrives and the harness hands you the JSON, which keeps the loop alive
across turns instead of dying with the foreground call. A foreground await
works too, but only until the harness time-limits it.
Two backstops exist, and neither is an excuse to skip the above:
ecc-plan-canvas pending lists feedback queued with no listener. Check it
whenever you are unsure whether you missed something.stop:plan-canvas-pending hook blocks your turn from ending while canvas
feedback is undelivered, and hands you the messages. If you are reading
feedback from that hook, you stopped listening too early.await prints JSON when the human acts:
{
"status": "feedback",
"items": [
{ "kind": "annotation", "text": "Split this into two phases",
"anchor": { "selector": "h2:nth-of-type(3)", "tag": "h2", "snippet": "Phase 2: Migration" } },
{ "kind": "verdict", "verdict": "request-changes" }
]
}
kind: "chat" — freeform message; answer in the canvas, not the terminal.kind: "annotation" — feedback anchored to an element (anchor.selector,
anchor.snippet show what they pointed at; anchor.textRange.text when
they highlighted a passage).kind: "verdict" — approve means the plan is CONFIRMED: stop polling,
end the session, and start implementing. request-changes means revise the
artifact (the canvas live-reloads it) and keep the loop going.3. Always respond in the canvas, then keep listening. One command does both:
ecc-plan-canvas await <file> --reply "Split Phase 2 as requested. Take a look."
Every human message gets a reply in the canvas, even a one-liner like "On it, rewriting the risk table now." Silence in the chat panel is indistinguishable from a broken canvas, which is exactly the failure this loop exists to prevent. Answer there, not only in the terminal.
While you work, keep the chat honest with the activity indicator:
# animated "agent is thinking..." bubble; refresh it during long work
ecc-plan-canvas typing <file> --state thinking
# switch to "agent is typing..." just before a reply lands
ecc-plan-canvas typing <file> --state typing
await sets thinking for you the moment it hands you a batch, and --reply
clears it. Both states self-expire, so a crashed agent decays to an honest
"queued" instead of leaving the human watching dots forever. Refresh thinking
if a revision takes more than a minute.
4. End when review concludes: ecc-plan-canvas end <file>.
When part of the plan is a flow, architecture, sequence, state machine, ER
model, or dependency graph, author it as a fenced ```mermaid block instead
of ASCII art or a wall of prose — the canvas renders it as a themed diagram the
human can point at. Reach for it when a picture reads faster than a paragraph;
skip it for simple lists or tables.
```mermaid
flowchart LR
A[Market resolves] --> B{Watchers?}
B -->|yes| C[Enqueue jobs] --> D[Fan-out worker]
```
Diagrams render in the ECC dark theme with the accent palette. Mermaid loads in
the browser from a pinned CDN; if that is unavailable (offline), the block
degrades to showing its source, so the review is never blocked. Point a local
mirror at ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_MERMAID_URL for air-gapped use.
.html artifacts render as-is with the annotation layer injected. For HTML
authoring guidance use the frontend-design-direction and artifact-design
skills.open to refresh.{"status": "ended", "endedBy": "user"} (or sessionEnded: true on a
feedback batch) means the user closed the review: stop polling, deliver
remaining updates in chat, and do not reopen. A plain open on that
session is refused; pass --reopen only when the user asks to resume.ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_IDLE_MS); stop shuts it down explicitly. State lives
in ~/.claude/plan-canvas/ (ECC_PLAN_CANVAS_STATE_DIR).Plan approval flow — /plan writes
.claude/plans/notifications.plan.md and must WAIT for confirmation:
ecc-plan-canvas open .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
ecc-plan-canvas await .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
# → {"status":"feedback","items":[{"kind":"verdict","verdict":"approve"}]}
ecc-plan-canvas end .claude/plans/notifications.plan.md
# plan is confirmed — begin implementation
Revision loop — feedback arrives, you edit the file, reply, keep listening:
# await returned annotations → edit the .plan.md (canvas live-reloads)
ecc-plan-canvas await <file> --reply "Reworked the risk table."
# → blocks again until the next response
--timeout-ms in a loop. It exists for tests. Leave the plain
await running instead.await listening while the review is still open.
That is the one failure the human experiences as "I sent a message and
nothing happened".await.Frequently asked questions
Review loop for plans and visual artifacts: you write the artifact, the human reviews it in the browser — annotating the exact element they mean, chatting, and delivering an Approve plan / Request changes verdict — while you block on a single CLI call that returns their feedback…
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/plan-canvas". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged exec-script, write-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.