Best for
- Do not use when a qualitative or prototype test is the clearly right answer without statistical measurement; do not prescribe A/B testing by default; do not treat statistical
magnus919/agent-skills/product-experimentation/SKILL.md
Run end-to-end product experiments from assumption to decision: translate assumptions into testable hypotheses and experiment briefs, select the right method among qualitative interviews, prototypes, concierge tests, fake doors, feature flags, and A/B tests, and produce readouts that update the roadmap and decision record. Do not use when a qualitative or prototype test is the clearly right answer without statistical measurement; do not prescribe A/B testing by default; do not treat statistical
Decision brief
End-to-end product experimentation: from assumption mapping through method selection, instrumentation, guardrail enforcement, and decision-readout that updates the product roadmap. Owns the complete experiment workflow; routes statistical design and rollout mechanics to speciali…
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skills --skill "product-experimentation"Inspect the Agent Skill "product-experimentation" from https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skills/blob/531ff6753784823c878c92b988c6e55266ce09a9/product-experimentation/SKILL.md at commit 531ff6753784823c878c92b988c6e55266ce09a9. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “Pipeline” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Load only the reference or template relevant to the task. Do not load every file at once.
Surface the assumptions driving the proposed change. Classify each by risk (what breaks if it is wrong), evidence strength (what evidence already exists), and testability (can it be tested, and how cheaply). Use templates/assumption-map.md.
Surface the assumptions driving the proposed change. Classify each by risk (what breaks if it is wrong), evidence strength (what evidence already exists), and testability (can it be tested, and how cheaply). Use templates/assumption-map.md.
Convert the riskiest, least-evidenced assumptions into falsifiable hypotheses. Each hypothesis names the independent variable (what changes), the dependent variable (what outcome is measured), the predicted direction, and the smallest effect that matters. Use templates/experimen…
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
Load only the reference or template relevant to the task. Do not load every file at once.Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 61 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
End-to-end product experimentation: from assumption mapping through method selection, instrumentation, guardrail enforcement, and decision-readout that updates the product roadmap. Owns the complete experiment workflow; routes statistical design and rollout mechanics to specialist skills.
ASSUMPTIONS → [HYPOTHESIS] → [METHOD SELECT] → [INSTRUMENT] → [RUN] → [DECIDE] → [RECORD]
| | | | | |
Experiment Qualitative Tracking Guardrail Decision Readout
brief Prototype plan monitor rules learning
Operational
Quantitative
Load only the reference or template relevant to the task. Do not load every file at once.
| File | Load when |
|---|---|
| references/discovery-brief.md | You need to understand how experimentation concepts map across skills and where this skill's boundaries are |
| references/method-selection.md | Choosing among qualitative, prototype, operational, and quantitative test methods |
| references/guardrails-and-ethics.md | Defining guardrail metrics, ethical boundaries, stopping rules, and decision ownership |
| references/experiment-readout.md | Producing a decision-impact readout that updates the roadmap or decision record |
| templates/experiment-brief.md | Filling out a structured experiment brief from an assumption |
| templates/assumption-map.md | Mapping assumptions to risk, evidence, and testability before designing experiments |
| templates/guardrail-and-decision-rule.md | Recording guardrails, stopping rules, and decision criteria for an experiment |
| templates/readout-learning-entry.md | Documenting experiment outcome and updating the roadmap, decision log, or lifecycle evidence |
Surface the assumptions driving the proposed change. Classify each by risk (what breaks if it is wrong), evidence strength (what evidence already exists), and testability (can it be tested, and how cheaply). Use templates/assumption-map.md.
Convert the riskiest, least-evidenced assumptions into falsifiable hypotheses. Each hypothesis names the independent variable (what changes), the dependent variable (what outcome is measured), the predicted direction, and the smallest effect that matters. Use templates/experiment-brief.md.
Choose the lightest-weight method that can falsify the hypothesis with sufficient confidence. The method ladder, from lightest to heaviest:
| Method | Best for | Cost | Statistical rigor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualitative interviews | Uncovering unknown unknowns, mental models, problem validation | Lowest | None (descriptive) |
| Prototype tests | Interaction flow, usability, concept validation | Low | None (observational) |
| Concierge tests | Value delivery, willingness to pay, operational feasibility | Low-Medium | None (manual) |
| Fake doors | Demand signals, willingness to click/commit | Medium | Low (conversion rate only) |
| Feature flags | Operational safety, incremental rollout, kill-switch | Medium | Medium (controlled rollout) |
| A/B tests | Causal attribution of a specific change to a metric | High | High (randomized controlled) |
Do not default to A/B testing. Start at the top of the ladder and only move down when the question cannot be answered at the current level. A qualitative interview or prototype test is often the right answer. Full method selection guidance is in references/method-selection.md.
Before running the experiment, define:
Use templates/guardrail-and-decision-rule.md to record these.
Define the target population, allocation, and minimum detectable effect. Route statistical design (power analysis, sample-size calculation, estimator selection) to ../data-scientist/SKILL.md. An underpowered experiment — one that cannot detect the smallest effect that matters — is a validity failure; do not ship based on a null result from an underpowered test.
Execute the experiment. Monitor guardrails continuously. Route production rollout mechanics (feature flags, canary stages, progressive delivery) to ../release-engineering/SKILL.md.
Make the ship/no-ship decision using multiple criteria, never statistical significance alone:
| Criterion | Weight | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Statistical evidence | Required | data-scientist |
| Practical significance | Required | Is the effect large enough to matter? |
| Guardrail evidence | Blocking | All guardrails must pass |
| Qualitative evidence | Informative | User feedback, support tickets |
| Reversibility | Informative | Can we undo this if wrong? |
| Opportunity cost | Informative | What else could we build instead? |
A statistically significant result with a failing guardrail is a no-ship. A statistically significant result that exceeds authority boundaries (e.g., safety, compliance, ethics) is a no-ship. Record the decision and its rationale.
Document what was learned and what changed as a result. The readout updates the product roadmap, backlog, decision log, or lifecycle evidence. Routing: feeds product-roadmapping-and-portfolio (roadmap updates), product-adoption (adoption evidence), and product-lifecycle-learning (retained learning). Use templates/readout-learning-entry.md and references/experiment-readout.md.
Load this skill when:
This skill is intentionally host-neutral. It requires no profile system, output format, scripts, or external services. Load references and templates directly by path using the host agent's normal file-loading mechanism.
Frequently asked questions
End-to-end product experimentation: from assumption mapping through method selection, instrumentation, guardrail enforcement, and decision-readout that updates the product roadmap. Owns the complete experiment workflow; routes statistical design and rollout mechanics to speciali…
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skills --skill "product-experimentation". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged read-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
mgiovani/cc-arsenal
Run the checks a GitHub Actions workflow would run, locally, when Actions is unavailable or out of quota. Parses .github/workflows/*.yml, extracts the jobs/steps that gate merges (lint, typecheck, test, build), translates them to local commands respecting the workflow's pinned node/python versions and env, executes them sequentially, and reports a parity table of what passed locally vs. what can't be replicated (service containers, secrets, matrix dimensions) and why. Activates on "CI quota", "A
synthetic-sciences/openscience
Comprehensive healthcare AI toolkit for developing, testing, and deploying machine learning models with clinical data. This skill should be used when working with electronic health records (EHR), clinical prediction tasks (mortality, readmission, drug recommendation), medical coding systems (ICD, NDC, ATC), physiological signals (EEG, ECG), healthcare datasets (MIMIC-III/IV, eICU, OMOP), or implementing deep learning models for healthcare applications (RETAIN, SafeDrug, Transformer, GNN).
narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace
Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "
VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic
Use this skill to test whether a Snowflake initiative removes a business constraint anyone owns: value hypothesis, pre-work baseline, benefit modelling by credibility category, unit economics, causal attribution, adoption, time to value, decision latency, alternatives including do-nothing, benefit realization, and translation into executive KPIs. Trigger when an initiative is proposed, prioritized, or being justified — and especially when the justification is that Snowflake supports the capabili