Best for
- Designing complex prompts for production LLM applications
- Optimizing prompt performance and consistency
- Implementing structured reasoning patterns (chain-of-thought, tree-of-thought)
wshobson/agents/plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/prompt-engineering-patterns/SKILL.md
This skill should be used when the user asks to "optimize a prompt", "improve prompt performance", "design a prompt template", "write better prompts", "debug prompt issues", "use chain-of-thought", "structured prompting", "few-shot prompting", or wants to apply advanced prompt engineering patterns for production LLM applications.
Decision brief
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill "plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/prompt-engineering-patterns"Inspect the Agent Skill "prompt-engineering-patterns" from https://github.com/wshobson/agents/blob/d82998e7df393c671ede2387a8435075f0b633f5/plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/prompt-engineering-patterns/SKILL.md at commit d82998e7df393c671ede2387a8435075f0b633f5. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
python from langchainanthropic import ChatAnthropic from langchaincore.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
Designing complex prompts for production LLM applications
Example selection strategies (semantic similarity, diversity sampling)
Example selection strategies (semantic similarity, diversity sampling)
Step-by-step reasoning elicitation
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
Detailed pattern documentation lives in `references/details.md`. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 86/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 39,098 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.
from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
# Define structured output schema
class SQLQuery(BaseModel):
query: str = Field(description="The SQL query")
explanation: str = Field(description="Brief explanation of what the query does")
tables_used: list[str] = Field(description="List of tables referenced")
# Initialize model with structured output
llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-5")
structured_llm = llm.with_structured_output(SQLQuery)
# Create prompt template
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages([
("system", """You are an expert SQL developer. Generate efficient, secure SQL queries.
Always use parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.
Explain your reasoning briefly."""),
("user", "Convert this to SQL: {query}")
])
# Create chain
chain = prompt | structured_llm
# Use
result = await chain.ainvoke({
"query": "Find all users who registered in the last 30 days"
})
print(result.query)
print(result.explanation)
Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
Track these KPIs for your prompts:
Frequently asked questions
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill "plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/prompt-engineering-patterns". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged read-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
event4u-app/agent-config
Use when designing production-LLM prompts — few-shot, chain-of-thought, system prompts, templates, self-verification — distinct from prompt-optimizer and refine-prompt.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
oaustegard/claude-skills
Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre
narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace
Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "