Best for
- Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills/ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485/SKILL.md
ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device d
Decision brief
ISO 13485:2016 Quality Management System implementation, maintenance, and certification support for medical device organizations.
In this controlled same-task single run, enabling quality-manager-qms-iso13485 changed the output from 2021 non-whitespace characters and 8 headings to 1953 characters and 15 headings. Matches among 8 signals extracted from the pinned source changed from 0 to 0. Both actual outputs are shown; this is a structural observation, not a quality score or a universal performance claim.
Review a flawed account-settings implementation for a small SaaS product. Prioritize concrete issues, explain impact, and provide corrected examples or decisions. The deliverable must specifically reflect this user intent: ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device d

Baseline: 2021 non-whitespace characters, 8 headings, and 52 list items.

With Skill: 1953 non-whitespace characters, 15 headings, and 16 list items.
| Observation | Without Skill | With Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Source-signal coverage | 0/8: none | 0/8: none |
| Output structure | 2021 chars · 8 headings · 52 list items · 1 code blocks | 1953 chars · 15 headings · 16 list items · 1 code blocks |
| Verification and caution signals | 2 verification signals · 6 risk/limitation signals | 9 verification signals · 11 risk/limitation signals |
Use the quality-manager-qms-iso13485 Skill pinned at aa8d778811a5 for my task. Follow its source-specific constraints around `quality-manager-qms-iso13485`, `quality`, `manager`, `specialist`, then return the finished deliverable with explicit assumptions, verification, failure conditions, and limits. Do not treat the Skill text as a factual source or claim that a single demonstration proves universal performance.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill "ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485"Inspect the Agent Skill "quality-manager-qms-iso13485" from https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/blob/98180dafc4f0bc9d629bd479fc6107674cfb3cf8/ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485/SKILL.md at commit 98180dafc4f0bc9d629bd479fc6107674cfb3cf8. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Implement ISO 13485:2016 compliant quality management system from gap analysis through certification.
1. Conduct gap analysis against ISO 13485:2016 requirements 2. Document current state vs. required state for each clause 3. Prioritize gaps by: - Regulatory criticality - Risk to product safety - Resource requirements 4. Develop implementation roadmap with milestones 5. Establis…
Establish and maintain document control per ISO 13485 Clause 4.2.3.
1. Identify need for new document or revision 2. Assign document number per numbering convention: - Format: [TYPE]-[AREA]-[SEQUENCE]-[REV] - Example: SOP-02-001-01 3. Draft document using approved template 4. Route for review to subject matter experts 5. Collect and address revi…
Review the “Document Review Schedule” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 98/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 24,921 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | tested outcome page | Tested | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
ISO 13485:2016 Quality Management System implementation, maintenance, and certification support for medical device organizations.
Implement ISO 13485:2016 compliant quality management system from gap analysis through certification.
Use the Gap Analysis Matrix template in qms-process-templates.md to document clause-by-clause current state, gaps, priority, and actions.
| Level | Document Type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quality Manual | QM-001 |
| 2 | Procedures | SOP-02-001 |
| 3 | Work Instructions | WI-06-012 |
| 4 | Records | Training records |
Establish and maintain document control per ISO 13485 Clause 4.2.3.
[TYPE]-[AREA]-[SEQUENCE]-[REV]SOP-02-001-01| Prefix | Document Type | Approval Authority |
|---|---|---|
| QM | Quality Manual | Management Rep + CEO |
| POL | Policy | Department Head + QA |
| SOP | Procedure | Process Owner + QA |
| WI | Work Instruction | Supervisor + QA |
| TF | Template/Form | Process Owner |
| SPEC | Specification | Engineering + QA |
| Code | Area | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Quality Management | Quality Manual, policy |
| 02 | Document Control | This procedure |
| 03 | Training | Competency procedures |
| 04 | Design | Design control |
| 05 | Purchasing | Supplier management |
| 06 | Production | Manufacturing |
| 07 | Quality Control | Inspection, testing |
| 08 | CAPA | Corrective actions |
| Change Type | Approval Level | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative | Document Control | Typos, formatting |
| Minor | Process Owner + QA | Clarifications |
| Major | Full review cycle | Process changes |
| Emergency | Expedited + retrospective | Safety issues |
| Document Type | Review Period | Trigger for Unscheduled Review |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Manual | Annual | Organizational change |
| Procedures | Annual | Audit finding, regulation change |
| Work Instructions | 2 years | Process change |
| Forms | 2 years | User feedback |
Plan and execute internal audits per ISO 13485 Clause 8.2.4.
Use the Audit Program Template in qms-process-templates.md to schedule audits by clause and quarter across processes such as Document Control (4.2.3/4.2.4), Management Review (5.6), Design Control (7.3), Production (7.5), and CAPA (8.5.2/8.5.3).
| Criterion | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Training | ISO 13485 awareness + auditor training |
| Experience | Minimum 1 audit as observer |
| Independence | Not auditing own work area |
| Competence | Understanding of audited process |
| Classification | Criteria | Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| Major NC | System absence, total breakdown, regulatory violation | 30 days for CAPA |
| Minor NC | Single instance, partial compliance | 60 days for CAPA |
| Observation | Potential risk, improvement opportunity | Track in next audit |
Validate special processes per ISO 13485 Clause 7.5.6.
| Phase | Content | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol | Objectives, methods, criteria | Approved protocol |
| IQ | Equipment verification | Installation records |
| OQ | Parameter verification | Test results |
| PQ | Performance verification | Production data |
| Report | Summary, conclusions | Approval signatures |
| Trigger | Action Required |
|---|---|
| Equipment change | Assess impact, revalidate affected phases |
| Parameter change | OQ and PQ minimum |
| Material change | Assess impact, PQ minimum |
| Process failure | Full revalidation |
| Periodic | Per validation schedule (typically 3 years) |
| Process | Validation Standard | Critical Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| EO Sterilization | ISO 11135 | Temperature, humidity, EO concentration, time |
| Steam Sterilization | ISO 17665 | Temperature, pressure, time |
| Radiation Sterilization | ISO 11137 | Dose, dose uniformity |
| Sealing | Internal | Temperature, pressure, dwell time |
| Welding | ISO 11607 | Heat, pressure, speed |
Evaluate and approve suppliers per ISO 13485 Clause 7.4.
80: Approved
| Criterion | Weight | Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Quality System | 30% | ISO 13485=30, ISO 9001=20, Documented=10, None=0 |
| Quality History | 25% | Reject rate: <1%=25, 1-3%=15, >3%=0 |
| Delivery | 20% | On-time: >95%=20, 90-95%=10, <90%=0 |
| Technical Capability | 15% | Exceeds=15, Meets=10, Marginal=5 |
| Financial Stability | 10% | Strong=10, Adequate=5, Questionable=0 |
| Category | Qualification | Monitoring | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| A - Critical | On-site audit | Annual review | Quality agreement |
| B - Major | Questionnaire | Semi-annual review | Quality requirements |
| C - Minor | Assessment | Issue-based | Standard terms |
| Metric | Target | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Accept Rate | >98% | (Accepted lots / Total lots) × 100 |
| On-Time Delivery | >95% | (On-time / Total orders) × 100 |
| Response Time | <5 days | Average days to resolve issues |
| Documentation | 100% | (Complete CoCs / Required CoCs) × 100 |
For detailed requirements and audit questions for each ISO 13485:2016 clause, see iso13485-clause-requirements.md.
| Input | Source | Prepared By |
|---|---|---|
| Audit results | Internal and external audits | QA Manager |
| Customer feedback | Complaints, surveys | Customer Quality |
| Process performance | Process metrics | Process Owners |
| Product conformity | Inspection data, NCs | QC Manager |
| CAPA status | CAPA system | CAPA Officer |
| Previous actions | Prior review records | QMR |
| Changes affecting QMS | Regulatory, organizational | RA Manager |
| Recommendations | All sources | All Managers |
⚠️ STATUS — QMSR transition (effective 2026-02-02): FDA's Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) final rule (89 FR 7496) amended 21 CFR Part 820 to incorporate ISO 13485:2016 by reference and removed the legacy QSR subsection structure. The section numbers below (820.30/.181/.184/.198) no longer exist in the CFR — they are retained only as a familiar index. The current authority for record retention is ISO 13485:2016 §4.2.5 (retain "for at least the lifetime of the medical device as defined by the organization, but not less than two years"), with records additions in retained 21 CFR 820.35. Cite the ISO 13485 clauses — not the 820.x numbers — in current compliance documentation.
| Record Type | Minimum Retention | Current authority under QMSR (legacy QSR shown for index) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Master Record | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §4.2.3 (medical device file)/§4.2.5 (legacy QSR 820.181, historical) |
| Device History Record | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §4.2.5 + 21 CFR 820.35 (legacy QSR 820.184, historical) |
| Design History File | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §7.3.10/§4.2.5 (legacy QSR 820.30, historical) |
| Complaint Records | Life of device + 2 years | ISO 13485 §8.2.2/§4.2.5 + 21 CFR 820.35(b) (legacy QSR 820.198, historical) |
| Training Records | Employment + 3 years | Best practice |
| Audit Records | 7 years | Best practice |
| CAPA Records | 7 years | Best practice |
| Calibration Records | Equipment life + 2 years | Best practice |
Decision discipline: This skill's checklists and tools structure QMS conformity assessment — they do not certify ISO 13485 / QMSR compliance. Final compliance determinations and record-retention decisions are yours to make and must be reviewed and signed off by the named QMR; route FDA-specific regulatory-classification questions to Regulatory Affairs and confirm current 21 CFR 820 / ISO 13485:2016 text at fda.gov before relying on any citation here.
| Clause | Permissible Exclusion | Justification Required |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4.2 | Contamination control | Product not affected by contamination |
| 7.3 | Design and development | Organization does not design products |
| 7.5.2 | Product cleanliness | No cleanliness requirements |
| 7.5.3 | Installation | No installation activities |
| 7.5.4 | Servicing | No servicing activities |
| 7.5.5 | Sterile products | No sterile products |
Nonconforming Product Identified
│
▼
Can it be reworked?
│
Yes──┴──No
│ │
▼ ▼
Is rework Can it be used
procedure as is?
available? │
│ Yes──┴──No
Yes─┴─No │ │
│ │ ▼ ▼
▼ ▼ Concession Scrap or
Rework Create approval return to
per SOP rework needed? supplier
procedure │
Yes─┴─No
│ │
▼ ▼
Customer Use as is
approval with MRB
approval
| Source | Automatic CAPA | Evaluate for CAPA |
|---|---|---|
| Customer complaint | Safety-related | All others |
| External audit | Major NC | Minor NC |
| Internal audit | Major NC | Repeat minor NC |
| Product NC | Field failure | Trend exceeds threshold |
| Process deviation | Safety impact | Repeated deviations |
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| qms_audit_checklist.py | Generate audit checklists by clause or process | python qms_audit_checklist.py --help |
Audit Checklist Generator Features:
--clause 7.3)--process design-control)--audit-type system)| Document | Content |
|---|---|
| iso13485-clause-requirements.md | Detailed requirements for each ISO 13485:2016 clause with audit questions |
| qms-process-templates.md | Ready-to-use templates for gap analysis, audit program, document control, CAPA, supplier, training |
| Procedure | Clause | Key Elements |
|---|---|---|
| Document Control | 4.2.3 | Approval, distribution, obsolete control |
| Record Control | 4.2.4 | Identification, retention, disposal |
| Internal Audit | 8.2.4 | Program, auditor qualification, reporting |
| NC Product Control | 8.3 | Identification, segregation, disposition |
| Corrective Action | 8.5.2 | Root cause, implementation, verification |
| Preventive Action | 8.5.3 | Risk identification, implementation |
| Skill | Integration Point |
|---|---|
| quality-manager-qmr | Management review, quality policy |
| capa-officer | CAPA system management |
| qms-audit-expert | Advanced audit techniques |
| quality-documentation-manager | DHF, DMR, DHR management |
| risk-management-specialist | ISO 14971 integration |
Frequently asked questions
ISO 13485:2016 Quality Management System implementation, maintenance, and certification support for medical device organizations.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill "ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
oaustegard/claude-skills
Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre
NintendaDev/unikit-ai
Generate and maintain the project's TECHNICAL documentation from its codebase — scans the project structure, tech stack, and module boundaries, then writes a lean README landing page plus detailed topic pages (architecture, modules, setup, build, APIs), only the docs that are relevant. Use whenever the user wants to create, update, or validate documentation of the CODE or the project itself, e.g. "generate documentation", "create docs", "write the README", "update the project docs", "document th
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills
Design and implement Minimal APIs in ASP.NET Core using handler-first endpoints, route groups, filters, and lightweight composition suited to modern .NET services.
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills
Implement the Model-View-ViewModel pattern in .NET applications with proper separation of concerns, data binding, commands, and testable ViewModels using MVVM Toolkit.