Tested demoQuality 98/100

alirezarezvani/claude-skills/ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485/SKILL.md

quality-manager-qms-iso13485

ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device d

Source repository stars
24,921
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-24
Source checked
2026-08-25

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

ISO 13485:2016 Quality Management System implementation, maintenance, and certification support for medical device organizations.

Best for

  • Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Controlled single-run demoChecked 2026-08-20

What changed when the Skill was used

In this controlled same-task single run, enabling quality-manager-qms-iso13485 changed the output from 2021 non-whitespace characters and 8 headings to 1953 characters and 15 headings. Matches among 8 signals extracted from the pinned source changed from 0 to 0. Both actual outputs are shown; this is a structural observation, not a quality score or a universal performance claim.

Same test task

Review a flawed account-settings implementation for a small SaaS product. Prioritize concrete issues, explain impact, and provide corrected examples or decisions. The deliverable must specifically reflect this user intent: ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device d

Without the Skill
Screenshot of the actual model output for quality-manager-qms-iso13485 without the Skill

Baseline: 2021 non-whitespace characters, 8 headings, and 52 list items.

With the Skill
Screenshot of the actual model output for quality-manager-qms-iso13485 with the Skill

With Skill: 1953 non-whitespace characters, 15 headings, and 16 list items.

ObservationWithout SkillWith Skill
Source-signal coverage0/8: none0/8: none
Output structure2021 chars · 8 headings · 52 list items · 1 code blocks1953 chars · 15 headings · 16 list items · 1 code blocks
Verification and caution signals2 verification signals · 6 risk/limitation signals9 verification signals · 11 risk/limitation signals

A prompt you can use

Use the quality-manager-qms-iso13485 Skill pinned at aa8d778811a5 for my task. Follow its source-specific constraints around `quality-manager-qms-iso13485`, `quality`, `manager`, `specialist`, then return the finished deliverable with explicit assumptions, verification, failure conditions, and limits. Do not treat the Skill text as a factual source or claim that a single demonstration proves universal performance.

Method and limitationsExpand

Test method

  • Baseline and treatment used the same task, model (gpt-5.3-codex-low), and runner; the only planned difference was whether the complete target Skill text was injected.
  • The treatment used snapshot aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc; the current source commit aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc was verified against content hash 9bdadc283b1a. The baseline explicitly prohibited loading any Skill or external rule file.
  • The same deterministic script counted characters, headings, lists, code blocks, verification terms, caution terms, and source signals in both artifacts. Source signals: `quality-manager-qms-iso13485`, `quality`, `manager`, `specialist`, `table`, `contents`, `initial`, `structure`.
  • The visuals are local screenshots of the actual Markdown artifacts in a fixed 1200 × 800 evidence canvas, not recreated product mockups. Raw JSON artifacts and request records are retained in the research directory.

Do not over-read this demo

  • This is one controlled demonstration per condition, not a multi-run statistical benchmark; the model is stochastic.
  • Character, structure, and keyword counts show observable differences but cannot by themselves prove correctness, originality, or business impact.
  • The task is a representative test designed for repeatability, not every real-world use of the Skill; rerun after a material source change.
Editorial review
SkillSignal editorial
Runner
Cursor Agent 2026.07.09-a3815c0
Model
gpt-5.3-codex-low
Refresh due
2026-11-18
Reviewed commit
aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc
Test snapshot
aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill "ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "quality-manager-qms-iso13485" from https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/blob/98180dafc4f0bc9d629bd479fc6107674cfb3cf8/ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485/SKILL.md at commit 98180dafc4f0bc9d629bd479fc6107674cfb3cf8. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    QMS Implementation Workflow

    Implement ISO 13485:2016 compliant quality management system from gap analysis through certification.

    Conduct gap analysis against ISO 13485:2016 requirementsDocument current state vs. required state for each clausePrioritize gaps by:
  2. 02

    Workflow: Initial QMS Implementation

    1. Conduct gap analysis against ISO 13485:2016 requirements 2. Document current state vs. required state for each clause 3. Prioritize gaps by: - Regulatory criticality - Risk to product safety - Resource requirements 4. Develop implementation roadmap with milestones 5. Establis…

    Conduct gap analysis against ISO 13485:2016 requirementsDocument current state vs. required state for each clausePrioritize gaps by:
  3. 03

    Document Control Workflow

    Establish and maintain document control per ISO 13485 Clause 4.2.3.

    Identify need for new document or revisionAssign document number per numbering convention:Format: [TYPE]-[AREA]-[SEQUENCE]-[REV]
  4. 04

    Workflow: Document Creation and Approval

    1. Identify need for new document or revision 2. Assign document number per numbering convention: - Format: [TYPE]-[AREA]-[SEQUENCE]-[REV] - Example: SOP-02-001-01 3. Draft document using approved template 4. Route for review to subject matter experts 5. Collect and address revi…

    Identify need for new document or revisionAssign document number per numbering convention:Format: [TYPE]-[AREA]-[SEQUENCE]-[REV]
  5. 05

    Document Review Schedule

    Review the “Document Review Schedule” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Document Review Schedule” source section.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score98/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars24,921SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guidetested outcome pageTestedGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Skill path
ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485/SKILL.md
Commit
98180dafc4f0bc9d629bd479fc6107674cfb3cf8
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-25
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Quality Manager - QMS ISO 13485 Specialist

ISO 13485:2016 Quality Management System implementation, maintenance, and certification support for medical device organizations.


Table of Contents


QMS Implementation Workflow

Implement ISO 13485:2016 compliant quality management system from gap analysis through certification.

Workflow: Initial QMS Implementation

  1. Conduct gap analysis against ISO 13485:2016 requirements
  2. Document current state vs. required state for each clause
  3. Prioritize gaps by:
    • Regulatory criticality
    • Risk to product safety
    • Resource requirements
  4. Develop implementation roadmap with milestones
  5. Establish Quality Manual per Clause 4.2.2:
    • QMS scope with justified exclusions
    • Process interactions
    • Procedure references
  6. Create required documented procedures — see Mandatory Documented Procedures for the full list
  7. Deploy processes with training
  8. Validation: Gap analysis complete; Quality Manual approved; all required procedures documented and trained

Use the Gap Analysis Matrix template in qms-process-templates.md to document clause-by-clause current state, gaps, priority, and actions.

QMS Structure

LevelDocument TypeExample
1Quality ManualQM-001
2ProceduresSOP-02-001
3Work InstructionsWI-06-012
4RecordsTraining records

Document Control Workflow

Establish and maintain document control per ISO 13485 Clause 4.2.3.

Workflow: Document Creation and Approval

  1. Identify need for new document or revision
  2. Assign document number per numbering convention:
    • Format: [TYPE]-[AREA]-[SEQUENCE]-[REV]
    • Example: SOP-02-001-01
  3. Draft document using approved template
  4. Route for review to subject matter experts
  5. Collect and address review comments
  6. Obtain required approvals based on document type
  7. Update Document Master List
  8. Validation: Document numbered correctly; all reviewers signed; Master List updated

Document Numbering Convention

PrefixDocument TypeApproval Authority
QMQuality ManualManagement Rep + CEO
POLPolicyDepartment Head + QA
SOPProcedureProcess Owner + QA
WIWork InstructionSupervisor + QA
TFTemplate/FormProcess Owner
SPECSpecificationEngineering + QA

Area Codes

CodeAreaExamples
01Quality ManagementQuality Manual, policy
02Document ControlThis procedure
03TrainingCompetency procedures
04DesignDesign control
05PurchasingSupplier management
06ProductionManufacturing
07Quality ControlInspection, testing
08CAPACorrective actions

Document Change Control

Change TypeApproval LevelExamples
AdministrativeDocument ControlTypos, formatting
MinorProcess Owner + QAClarifications
MajorFull review cycleProcess changes
EmergencyExpedited + retrospectiveSafety issues

Document Review Schedule

Document TypeReview PeriodTrigger for Unscheduled Review
Quality ManualAnnualOrganizational change
ProceduresAnnualAudit finding, regulation change
Work Instructions2 yearsProcess change
Forms2 yearsUser feedback

Internal Audit Workflow

Plan and execute internal audits per ISO 13485 Clause 8.2.4.

Workflow: Annual Audit Program

  1. Identify processes and areas requiring audit coverage
  2. Assess risk factors for audit frequency:
    • Previous audit findings
    • Regulatory changes
    • Process changes
    • Complaint trends
  3. Assign qualified auditors (independent of area audited)
  4. Develop annual audit schedule
  5. Obtain management approval
  6. Communicate schedule to process owners
  7. Track completion and reschedule as needed
  8. Validation: All processes covered; auditors qualified and independent; schedule approved

Use the Audit Program Template in qms-process-templates.md to schedule audits by clause and quarter across processes such as Document Control (4.2.3/4.2.4), Management Review (5.6), Design Control (7.3), Production (7.5), and CAPA (8.5.2/8.5.3).

Workflow: Individual Audit Execution

  1. Prepare audit plan with scope, criteria, and schedule
  2. Notify auditee minimum 1 week prior
  3. Review procedures and previous audit results
  4. Prepare audit checklist
  5. Conduct opening meeting
  6. Collect evidence through:
    • Document review
    • Record sampling
    • Process observation
    • Personnel interviews
  7. Classify findings:
    • Major NC: Absence or breakdown of system
    • Minor NC: Single lapse or deviation
    • Observation: Risk of future NC
  8. Conduct closing meeting
  9. Issue audit report within 5 business days
  10. Validation: All checklist items addressed; findings supported by evidence; report distributed

Auditor Qualification Requirements

CriterionRequirement
TrainingISO 13485 awareness + auditor training
ExperienceMinimum 1 audit as observer
IndependenceNot auditing own work area
CompetenceUnderstanding of audited process

Finding Classification Guide

ClassificationCriteriaResponse Time
Major NCSystem absence, total breakdown, regulatory violation30 days for CAPA
Minor NCSingle instance, partial compliance60 days for CAPA
ObservationPotential risk, improvement opportunityTrack in next audit

Process Validation Workflow

Validate special processes per ISO 13485 Clause 7.5.6.

Workflow: Process Validation Protocol

  1. Identify processes requiring validation:
    • Output cannot be verified by inspection
    • Deficiencies appear only in use
    • Sterilization, welding, sealing, software
  2. Form validation team with subject matter experts
  3. Write validation protocol including:
    • Process description and parameters
    • Equipment and materials
    • Acceptance criteria
    • Statistical approach
  4. Execute IQ: verify equipment installed correctly and document specifications
  5. Execute OQ: test parameter ranges and verify process control
  6. Execute PQ: run production conditions and verify output meets requirements
  7. Write validation report with conclusions
  8. Validation: IQ/OQ/PQ complete; acceptance criteria met; validation report approved

Validation Documentation Requirements

PhaseContentEvidence
ProtocolObjectives, methods, criteriaApproved protocol
IQEquipment verificationInstallation records
OQParameter verificationTest results
PQPerformance verificationProduction data
ReportSummary, conclusionsApproval signatures

Revalidation Triggers

TriggerAction Required
Equipment changeAssess impact, revalidate affected phases
Parameter changeOQ and PQ minimum
Material changeAssess impact, PQ minimum
Process failureFull revalidation
PeriodicPer validation schedule (typically 3 years)

Special Process Examples

ProcessValidation StandardCritical Parameters
EO SterilizationISO 11135Temperature, humidity, EO concentration, time
Steam SterilizationISO 17665Temperature, pressure, time
Radiation SterilizationISO 11137Dose, dose uniformity
SealingInternalTemperature, pressure, dwell time
WeldingISO 11607Heat, pressure, speed

Supplier Qualification Workflow

Evaluate and approve suppliers per ISO 13485 Clause 7.4.

Workflow: New Supplier Qualification

  1. Identify supplier category:
    • Category A: Critical (affects safety/performance)
    • Category B: Major (affects quality)
    • Category C: Minor (indirect impact)
  2. Request supplier information:
    • Quality certifications
    • Product specifications
    • Quality history
  3. Evaluate supplier based on:
    • Quality system (ISO certification)
    • Technical capability
    • Quality history
    • Financial stability
  4. For Category A suppliers:
    • Conduct on-site audit
    • Require quality agreement
  5. Calculate qualification score
  6. Make approval decision:
    • 80: Approved

    • 60-80: Conditional approval
    • <60: Not approved
  7. Add to Approved Supplier List
  8. Validation: Evaluation criteria scored; qualification records complete; supplier categorized

Supplier Evaluation Criteria

CriterionWeightScoring
Quality System30%ISO 13485=30, ISO 9001=20, Documented=10, None=0
Quality History25%Reject rate: <1%=25, 1-3%=15, >3%=0
Delivery20%On-time: >95%=20, 90-95%=10, <90%=0
Technical Capability15%Exceeds=15, Meets=10, Marginal=5
Financial Stability10%Strong=10, Adequate=5, Questionable=0

Supplier Category Requirements

CategoryQualificationMonitoringAgreement
A - CriticalOn-site auditAnnual reviewQuality agreement
B - MajorQuestionnaireSemi-annual reviewQuality requirements
C - MinorAssessmentIssue-basedStandard terms

Supplier Performance Metrics

MetricTargetCalculation
Accept Rate>98%(Accepted lots / Total lots) × 100
On-Time Delivery>95%(On-time / Total orders) × 100
Response Time<5 daysAverage days to resolve issues
Documentation100%(Complete CoCs / Required CoCs) × 100

QMS Process Reference

For detailed requirements and audit questions for each ISO 13485:2016 clause, see iso13485-clause-requirements.md.

Management Review Required Inputs (Clause 5.6.2)

InputSourcePrepared By
Audit resultsInternal and external auditsQA Manager
Customer feedbackComplaints, surveysCustomer Quality
Process performanceProcess metricsProcess Owners
Product conformityInspection data, NCsQC Manager
CAPA statusCAPA systemCAPA Officer
Previous actionsPrior review recordsQMR
Changes affecting QMSRegulatory, organizationalRA Manager
RecommendationsAll sourcesAll Managers

Record Retention Requirements

⚠️ STATUS — QMSR transition (effective 2026-02-02): FDA's Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) final rule (89 FR 7496) amended 21 CFR Part 820 to incorporate ISO 13485:2016 by reference and removed the legacy QSR subsection structure. The section numbers below (820.30/.181/.184/.198) no longer exist in the CFR — they are retained only as a familiar index. The current authority for record retention is ISO 13485:2016 §4.2.5 (retain "for at least the lifetime of the medical device as defined by the organization, but not less than two years"), with records additions in retained 21 CFR 820.35. Cite the ISO 13485 clauses — not the 820.x numbers — in current compliance documentation.

Record TypeMinimum RetentionCurrent authority under QMSR (legacy QSR shown for index)
Device Master RecordLife of device + 2 yearsISO 13485 §4.2.3 (medical device file)/§4.2.5 (legacy QSR 820.181, historical)
Device History RecordLife of device + 2 yearsISO 13485 §4.2.5 + 21 CFR 820.35 (legacy QSR 820.184, historical)
Design History FileLife of device + 2 yearsISO 13485 §7.3.10/§4.2.5 (legacy QSR 820.30, historical)
Complaint RecordsLife of device + 2 yearsISO 13485 §8.2.2/§4.2.5 + 21 CFR 820.35(b) (legacy QSR 820.198, historical)
Training RecordsEmployment + 3 yearsBest practice
Audit Records7 yearsBest practice
CAPA Records7 yearsBest practice
Calibration RecordsEquipment life + 2 yearsBest practice

Decision discipline: This skill's checklists and tools structure QMS conformity assessment — they do not certify ISO 13485 / QMSR compliance. Final compliance determinations and record-retention decisions are yours to make and must be reviewed and signed off by the named QMR; route FDA-specific regulatory-classification questions to Regulatory Affairs and confirm current 21 CFR 820 / ISO 13485:2016 text at fda.gov before relying on any citation here.


Decision Frameworks

Exclusion Justification (Clause 4.2.2)

ClausePermissible ExclusionJustification Required
6.4.2Contamination controlProduct not affected by contamination
7.3Design and developmentOrganization does not design products
7.5.2Product cleanlinessNo cleanliness requirements
7.5.3InstallationNo installation activities
7.5.4ServicingNo servicing activities
7.5.5Sterile productsNo sterile products

Nonconformity Disposition Decision Tree

Nonconforming Product Identified
            │
            ▼
    Can it be reworked?
            │
       Yes──┴──No
        │       │
        ▼       ▼
    Is rework     Can it be used
    procedure     as is?
    available?        │
        │        Yes──┴──No
    Yes─┴─No     │       │
     │    │     ▼       ▼
     ▼    ▼  Concession  Scrap or
  Rework  Create    approval    return to
  per SOP  rework    needed?    supplier
          procedure     │
                    Yes─┴─No
                     │    │
                     ▼    ▼
                 Customer  Use as is
                 approval  with MRB
                          approval

CAPA Initiation Criteria

SourceAutomatic CAPAEvaluate for CAPA
Customer complaintSafety-relatedAll others
External auditMajor NCMinor NC
Internal auditMajor NCRepeat minor NC
Product NCField failureTrend exceeds threshold
Process deviationSafety impactRepeated deviations

Tools and References

Scripts

ToolPurposeUsage
qms_audit_checklist.pyGenerate audit checklists by clause or processpython qms_audit_checklist.py --help

Audit Checklist Generator Features:

  • Generate clause-specific checklists (e.g., --clause 7.3)
  • Generate process-based checklists (e.g., --process design-control)
  • Full system audit checklist (--audit-type system)
  • Text or JSON output formats
  • Interactive mode for guided selection

References

DocumentContent
iso13485-clause-requirements.mdDetailed requirements for each ISO 13485:2016 clause with audit questions
qms-process-templates.mdReady-to-use templates for gap analysis, audit program, document control, CAPA, supplier, training

Quick Reference: Mandatory Documented Procedures

ProcedureClauseKey Elements
Document Control4.2.3Approval, distribution, obsolete control
Record Control4.2.4Identification, retention, disposal
Internal Audit8.2.4Program, auditor qualification, reporting
NC Product Control8.3Identification, segregation, disposition
Corrective Action8.5.2Root cause, implementation, verification
Preventive Action8.5.3Risk identification, implementation

Related Skills

SkillIntegration Point
quality-manager-qmrManagement review, quality policy
capa-officerCAPA system management
qms-audit-expertAdvanced audit techniques
quality-documentation-managerDHF, DMR, DHR management
risk-management-specialistISO 14971 integration

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the quality-manager-qms-iso13485 source document cover?

ISO 13485:2016 Quality Management System implementation, maintenance, and certification support for medical device organizations.

How do I install quality-manager-qms-iso13485?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill "ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qms-iso13485". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 100147

oaustegard/claude-skills

featuring

Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre

Computed 9916

NintendaDev/unikit-ai

unikit-docs

Generate and maintain the project's TECHNICAL documentation from its codebase — scans the project structure, tech stack, and module boundaries, then writes a lean README landing page plus detailed topic pages (architecture, modules, setup, build, APIs), only the docs that are relevant. Use whenever the user wants to create, update, or validate documentation of the CODE or the project itself, e.g. "generate documentation", "create docs", "write the README", "update the project docs", "document th

Computed 989

Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills

dotnet-minimal-apis

Design and implement Minimal APIs in ASP.NET Core using handler-first endpoints, route groups, filters, and lightweight composition suited to modern .NET services.

Computed 989

Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills

dotnet-mvvm

Implement the Model-View-ViewModel pattern in .NET applications with proper separation of concerns, data binding, commands, and testable ViewModels using MVVM Toolkit.