Best for
- Use when asked to assess agent readiness, repeated agent failures, Rules/Skills/Hooks/Memory effectiveness, missing validation or recovery loops, or whether a harness repair improved later outcomes.
majiayu000/spellbook/skills/review-agent-harness/SKILL.md
Review whether a repository's coding-agent harness can reliably carry work from intent through controlled execution, verification, delivery, and learning. Use when asked to assess agent readiness, repeated agent failures, Rules/Skills/Hooks/Memory effectiveness, missing validation or recovery loops, or whether a harness repair improved later outcomes. Do not use for code-only audits, AGENTS-only audits, individual skill reliability reviews, or executing the task itself.
Decision brief
Review the operating system around coding agents, not only its files. Separate declared assets, reachable routes, observed task use, and later outcomes.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook --skill "skills/review-agent-harness"Inspect the Agent Skill "review-agent-harness" from https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook/blob/9e96aa5f52e8504cbbf9d359def29f9abcde57ce/skills/review-agent-harness/SKILL.md at commit 9e96aa5f52e8504cbbf9d359def29f9abcde57ce. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Record target, mode, provider, locale, decision, acceptance boundary, output mode, included sources, excluded sources, and unavailable evidence. Treat a missing required source as unobserved; do not substitute a broader directory, another provider, or remembered results.
Keep the passes logically independent even when one agent runs them in sequence:
Retain each distinct eligible candidate. Merge only when consequence, root cause, owner, and verifier are the same. The lead alone assigns severity, confidence, primary dimension, verification state, and priority.
For inline review, render the overview, frozen snapshot, five-dimension scorecard, all 15 checks, structured verification runs, findings, evidence boundary, and at most three priority moves in the response. Do not write to the target.
Read Repair Loop for follow-up. This review does not authorize fixes. Route a selected finding to its owner in a separate task, run its verifier on the final state, and update repairstate only.
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
`static`: inspect the target repository only. Use by default.The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
python3 scripts/collect_evidence.py \The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
python3 scripts/collect_evidence.py \The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
inspect the authorized repository read-only;Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 91/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 262 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Review the operating system around coding agents, not only its files. Separate declared assets, reachable routes, observed task use, and later outcomes.
Resolve the directory containing this SKILL.md before running its scripts.
Select one mode:
static: inspect the target repository only. Use by default.episode: add explicitly authorized Codex or Claude Code JSONL sources.longitudinal: compare a validated report with the existing ledger.Default to inline, read-only output. Write a durable report under the target only when the user explicitly requests an artifact or historical tracking. Never discover user-home Sessions, read Memory bodies, or inspect another provider merely because its files are available.
Use adjacent skills instead when their narrower owner is sufficient:
codebase-audit for code defects and architecture health;repo-agent-context-audit for AGENTS, Skills, and Specs alone;skill-lifeguard for one Skill's reliable contract;flowguard for running a long task;review-gate before landing an agent-generated diff.Record target, mode, provider, locale, decision, acceptance boundary, output
mode, included sources, excluded sources, and unavailable evidence. Treat a
missing required source as unobserved; do not substitute a broader directory,
another provider, or remembered results.
Resolve the target before interpreting assets or assigning scores. The collector
classifies it as exact_git_root, inside_git_worktree,
contains_nested_git_root, or non_git_directory. If the supplied directory
contains a nested Git root, stop and retarget that exact repository; do not
score the parent as though it were the project. For a Git target, the collector
uses Git's tracked and untracked inventory and excludes ignored worktrees and
prior review output from repository evidence.
Run static collection from the installed Skill directory:
python3 scripts/collect_evidence.py \
--target /absolute/target \
--mode static \
--locale zh-CN \
--decision "assess agent-harness readiness" \
--acceptance-boundary "resolve all five dimensions" \
--output-mode inline \
--output /temporary/evidence.json
For Session-informed review, require the user to authorize exact files or an exact root. Use one provider per evidence envelope:
python3 scripts/collect_evidence.py \
--target /absolute/target \
--mode episode \
--provider codex \
--session-file /explicit/session.jsonl \
--locale zh-CN \
--decision "explain the observed verification gap" \
--acceptance-boundary "separate configured and exercised routes" \
--output-mode inline \
--output /temporary/evidence.json
Use --session-root only when that exact recursive scope was authorized. Add
--include-request-summaries only when sanitized request summaries are needed
for the decision. Read Privacy Boundary and
Session Adapters before Session-informed work.
Omit --output to stream evidence to stdout. Inline means no target writes;
environment-owned scratch remains allowed. validate_findings.py --input -
accepts findings JSON from stdin when the caller already has a stream.
Checkpoint: collection must return agent-harness-evidence; every stage must
be available, constrained, not_authorized, not_applicable, unavailable,
or unobserved. A depth-limited scan is constrained, never silently complete.
Stop on malformed output or an unexplained missing stage.
Copy the collector-owned scope.target_id and complete scope.snapshot
(baseline, target_relation, and id) into the findings document. Never
author these values manually. The renderer and ledger updater recompute the
binding from --target and reject a different local directory or any target
state that changed after collection. A previous report, ledger row, branch
name, or remembered result is a historical lead only. Recheck any retained
claim against the frozen current snapshot and label genuinely historical
evidence as such.
Keep the passes logically independent even when one agent runs them in sequence:
Do not launch parallel agents by default. If the user explicitly requests
threads, use threads with read-only lanes and bounded evidence packets. A
specialist proposes candidates; it does not assign final severity or claim
effectiveness.
Read Review Model before classifying the five
dimensions. Use present -> reachable -> exercised -> outcome_supported only
when each stronger state has direct evidence.
Resolve all 15 stable checks, three per dimension. Assign a score to each
dimension only after resolving its checks. The score is an evidence-bounded
summary, not a finding: present caps a dimension at 74, reachable at 84,
exercised at 94, and outcome_supported at 100; missing or unobserved
caps it at 59. Use the lowest applicable check ceiling and retain a short score
rationale. Do not compute an overall score.
Retain each distinct eligible candidate. Merge only when consequence, root cause, owner, and verifier are the same. The lead alone assigns severity, confidence, primary dimension, verification state, and priority.
Read Finding Contract. Every finding needs:
Counts, file absence without a requirement, similarity, theoretical risk,
score, or unavailable evidence never create a finding. Critical and High
findings require an adversarial check; retain an unavailable check as
unverified instead of presenting it as confirmed.
Record each executed verifier in verification_runs with a stable id, purpose,
result, exit code, final-state flag, and bounded summary. A confirmed Critical
or High finding must cite a final-state candidate_refutation or
targeted_reproduction run that supports the claim. Inspect aggregate exit
semantics: a child syntax error or failed subcheck paired with aggregate exit 0
is evidence of a false-green verifier, not a passing check.
Author one agent-harness-findings JSON object in environment-owned scratch
space, then validate it:
python3 scripts/validate_findings.py --input /temporary/findings.json --strict --json
Fix the findings data, not the validator. Stop if validation does not pass.
For inline review, render the overview, frozen snapshot, five-dimension scorecard, all 15 checks, structured verification runs, findings, evidence boundary, and at most three priority moves in the response. Do not write to the target.
When durable output is explicitly requested, render atomically:
python3 scripts/render_report.py \
--findings /temporary/findings.json \
--evidence /temporary/evidence.json \
--target /absolute/target \
--out /absolute/target/.agent-harness-review \
--json
The renderer refuses to replace an existing run and writes only validated
findings.json, privacy-safe evidence.json, and derived report.md.
For longitudinal mode, update the ledger after a fresh review:
python3 scripts/update_ledger.py \
--findings /temporary/findings.json \
--target /absolute/target \
--ledger /absolute/target/.agent-harness-review/ledger.json \
--json
An absent prior finding remains open with recheck_required until a targeted
spot-check produces an agent-harness-resolution-confirmations document. Each
confirmation must retain the finding id, verifier, and one bounded
evidence_ref. Pass it with
--resolution-confirmations /temporary/confirmations.json. Never resolve from
finder absence or an id-only assertion.
Read Repair Loop for follow-up. This review does
not authorize fixes. Route a selected finding to its owner in a separate task,
run its verifier on the final state, and update repair_state only.
Do not upgrade learning-retention from same-window repair evidence. For a
tool-backed route, collect the later Episode with --mechanism-category edit
or validation, --episode-role later, and an explicit --comparison-basis;
collect the baseline with the same basis and --episode-role baseline. The
adapter count shows only that coarse mechanism was exercised. Use bounded file
or policy evidence to map the category to the repaired route. Separately require
target-owned command or artifact references showing the result improved and
guardrails still passed. Adapter counts, collection time, or a request summary
alone never prove later effect.
When claiming outcome_supported, pass both collector envelopes to every gate:
validate_findings.py --evidence baseline.json --evidence later.json, and use
the same repeated --evidence flags with render_report.py or
update_ledger.py. The claim is rejected without exactly one bound baseline
and one bound later envelope.
Direct actions:
Escalate before:
Evidence-backed pushback: reject a requested score or conclusion when the target is not the exact repository, the relevant evidence is unavailable, an aggregate verifier hides a failed subcheck, or a historical claim was not rechecked on the frozen snapshot. State the concrete boundary and the smallest next command that could resolve it.
Feedback loop: replay the closest case in evals/evals.json after a miss or
false positive, add one focused regression test, and patch the smallest durable
owner in the collector, validator, renderer, or written contract.
unobserved and continue only with static mechanisms./absolute/target/.agent-harness-review, and the ledger updater accepts
only its ledger.json below that directory.Finish only when:
unobserved / not_applicable boundary;validate_findings.py --strict;Use evals/evals.json and the repository tests as the replay surface. Patch the
smallest durable owner when the Skill over-triggers, misses a primary request,
accepts private data, treats configuration as use, resolves from absence, or
claims later effectiveness from same-window checks.
scripts/collect_evidence.py: static collector and Session adapter facade.scripts/validate_findings.py: findings, evidence-state, and privacy gate.scripts/render_report.py: atomic durable Markdown renderer.scripts/update_ledger.py: conservative longitudinal ledger.references/review-model.md: dimensions and evidence semantics.references/finding-contract.md: authoring and reconciliation contract.references/privacy-boundary.md: authorization and redaction rules.references/session-adapters.md: Codex and Claude Code input boundaries.references/repair-loop.md: repair progress versus later effectiveness.Frequently asked questions
Review the operating system around coding agents, not only its files. Separate declared assets, reachable routes, observed task use, and later outcomes.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook --skill "skills/review-agent-harness". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged read-files, exec-script in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
equinor/neqsim
Engineering deliverable quality — the nine analytical-depth moves (contributor ranking, adjudicating the source document, quantitative rule-outs, robustness crossover, conservatism direction, discriminating test), results.json schema, figure→discussion→linked_results traceability, evidence matrices, assumptions/gaps registers, citation conventions, KaTeX math formatting, units consistency, executive-summary structure, AACE class declaration. USE WHEN: producing a task report, a PEPR/M1/root-caus
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Suede-owned experimentation discipline for hypotheses, sample sizing, test duration, significance, and repeatable experiment programs. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment backlog and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), or writing the variant copy itself (use suede-copy).