Source profileQuality 76/100

nexu-io/open-design/skills/review-animations/SKILL.md

review-animations

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Source repository stars
91,167
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-25
Source checked
2026-08-25

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill "skills/review-animations"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "review-animations" from https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design/blob/edfa6b5f447e95cb120eae030f03baba00dc34de/skills/review-animations/SKILL.md at commit edfa6b5f447e95cb120eae030f03baba00dc34de. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Operating Posture

      You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass.…

      You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, f…The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review method — non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteri…For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see STANDARDS.md. Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.
    2. 02

      The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards

      Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.

      Justified motion. Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" — spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a bl…Frequency-appropriate. Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get no animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.Responsive easing. Entering/exiting elements use ease-out or a strong custom curve. ease-in on UI is a block — it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers.
    3. 03

      Aggressive Escalation Triggers

      Flag these on sight, hard:

      transition: all (unbounded property animation)scale(0) or pure-fade entrances with no initial transformease-in on any UI interaction; weak built-in easing on a deliberate animation
    4. 04

      Remedial Preference Hierarchy

      When proposing fixes, prefer earlier moves over later ones:

      Delete the animation (high-frequency / no purpose / keyboard-triggered).Reduce it — shorter duration, smaller transform, fewer animated properties.Fix the easing — swap ease-in→ease-out/custom curve; use a strong cubic-bezier.
    5. 05

      Required Output Format

      Two parts, in this order.

      Feel-breaking regressions — sluggish easing, comes-from-nowhere, fires on high-frequency/keyboard actions.Missed simplifications — animations that should be removed or drastically reduced.Performance — non-GPU properties, dropped-frame risks, recalc storms.

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    No configured static risk pattern was detected

    This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score76/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars91,167SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    nexu-io/open-design
    Skill path
    skills/review-animations/SKILL.md
    Commit
    edfa6b5f447e95cb120eae030f03baba00dc34de
    License
    Apache-2.0
    Collected
    2026-08-25
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    Reviewing Animations

    A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

    Operating Posture

    You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass. Default to flagging. Approval is earned, not assumed.

    The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review method — non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteria — is adapted from aggressive code-quality review.

    For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see STANDARDS.md. Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.

    The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards

    Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.

    1. Justified motion. Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" — spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a block.

    2. Frequency-appropriate. Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get no animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.

    3. Responsive easing. Entering/exiting elements use ease-out or a strong custom curve. ease-in on UI is a block — it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers.

    4. Sub-300ms UI. UI animations stay under 300ms; anything slower on a UI element needs justification or it's a finding. Per-element budgets live in STANDARDS.md.

    5. Origin & physical correctness. Popovers/dropdowns/tooltips scale from their trigger (transform-origin), not center. Never animate from scale(0) — start from scale(0.9–0.97) + opacity (Modals are exempt — they stay centered.)

    6. Interruptibility. Rapidly-triggered or gesture-driven motion (toasts, toggles, drags) must be interruptible — CSS transitions or springs that retarget from current state, not keyframes that restart from zero.

    7. GPU-only properties. Animate transform and opacity only. Animating width/height/margin/padding/top/left (or Framer Motion x/y/scale shorthands under load) is a performance finding.

    8. Accessibility. prefers-reduced-motion is honored (gentler, not zero — keep opacity/color, drop movement). Hover animations are gated behind @media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine).

    9. Asymmetric enter/exit. Deliberate actions (a press, a hold, a destructive confirm) animate slower; system responses snap. Symmetric timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction is a finding.

    10. Cohesion. Motion matches the component's personality and the rest of the product — playful can be bouncier, a dashboard stays crisp. Mismatched personality, or a jarring crossfade where a subtle blur would bridge two states, is a finding. When unsure whether motion feels right, the strongest move is often to delete it.

    Aggressive Escalation Triggers

    Flag these on sight, hard:

    • transition: all (unbounded property animation)
    • scale(0) or pure-fade entrances with no initial transform
    • ease-in on any UI interaction; weak built-in easing on a deliberate animation
    • Animation on a keyboard shortcut, command-palette toggle, or 100+/day action
    • UI duration > 300ms with no stated reason
    • transform-origin: center on a trigger-anchored popover/dropdown/tooltip
    • Keyframes on toasts, toggles, or anything added/triggered rapidly
    • Animating layout properties (width/height/margin/padding/top/left)
    • Framer Motion x/y/scale props on motion that runs while the page is busy
    • Updating a CSS variable on a parent to drive a child transform (style recalc storm)
    • Missing prefers-reduced-motion handling on movement
    • Ungated :hover motion
    • Symmetric enter/exit timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction
    • Everything-at-once entrance where a 30–80ms stagger belongs

    Remedial Preference Hierarchy

    When proposing fixes, prefer earlier moves over later ones:

    1. Delete the animation (high-frequency / no purpose / keyboard-triggered).
    2. Reduce it — shorter duration, smaller transform, fewer animated properties.
    3. Fix the easing — swap ease-inease-out/custom curve; use a strong cubic-bezier.
    4. Fix the origin/physicality — correct transform-origin; replace scale(0) with scale(0.95)+opacity.
    5. Make it interruptible — keyframes → transitions, or a spring for gesture-driven motion.
    6. Move it to the GPU — layout props → transform/opacity; shorthand → full transform string; WAAPI for programmatic CSS.
    7. Asymmetric timing — slow the deliberate phase, snap the response.
    8. Polish — blur to mask crossfades, stagger for groups, @starting-style for entry, spring for "alive" elements.
    9. Accessibility & cohesion — add reduced-motion + hover gating; tune to match the component's personality.

    Required Output Format

    Two parts, in this order.

    Part 1 — Findings table (REQUIRED)

    A single markdown table. One row per issue. Never a "Before:/After:" list.

    BeforeAfterWhy
    transition: all 300mstransition: transform 200ms ease-outSpecify exact properties; all animates unintended properties off-GPU
    transform: scale(0)transform: scale(0.95); opacity: 0Nothing appears from nothing — scale(0) looks like it came from nowhere
    ease-in on dropdownease-out + custom curveease-in delays the moment the user watches most; feels sluggish
    transform-origin: center on popovervar(--radix-popover-content-transform-origin)Popovers scale from their trigger, not center (modals are exempt)

    Part 2 — Verdict (REQUIRED)

    Group remaining commentary by impact tier, highest first. Omit empty tiers.

    1. Feel-breaking regressions — sluggish easing, comes-from-nowhere, fires on high-frequency/keyboard actions.
    2. Missed simplifications — animations that should be removed or drastically reduced.
    3. Performance — non-GPU properties, dropped-frame risks, recalc storms.
    4. Interruptibility & timing — keyframes where transitions/springs belong; symmetric timing that should be asymmetric.
    5. Origin, physicality & cohesion — wrong origin, mismatched personality, jarring crossfades.
    6. Accessibility — reduced-motion and pointer/hover gating.

    Close with an explicit decision:

    • Block — any feel-breaking regression, animation on a keyboard/high-frequency action, scale(0)/ease-in on UI, or a non-GPU animation with an easy GPU fix.
    • Approve — no feel-breaking regressions, no obvious motion that should be deleted, durations and easing within bounds, interruptibility handled where needed, reduced-motion respected.

    Be specific and cite file:line. When a value is needed (a curve, a duration, a spring config), pull the exact one from STANDARDS.md rather than approximating.

    Guidelines

    • Prefer CSS transitions/@starting-style/WAAPI for predetermined motion; JS/springs for dynamic, interruptible, gesture-driven motion.
    • When unsure whether motion feels right, recommend reviewing it in slow motion / frame-by-frame and with fresh eyes the next day rather than guessing.

    Frequently asked questions

    What to verify before installation and use

    What does the review-animations source document cover?

    A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

    How do I install review-animations?

    The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill "skills/review-animations". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 10045,511

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    ab-testing

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

    Computed 100147

    oaustegard/claude-skills

    featuring

    Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre

    Computed 1008

    narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace

    design-analysis

    Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "

    Computed 1007

    event4u-app/agent-config

    existing-ui-audit

    Use BEFORE writing or editing any non-trivial UI — inventories components, design tokens, shadcn primitives, and reusable patterns into state.ui_audit. Hard gate for the ui directive set.