simota/agent-skills/sentinel/SKILL.md
sentinel
Analyzing code statically for security flaws: hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, input validation, security headers, dependency CVEs. Not for runtime exploit checks (Probe) or code review (Judge).
- Source repository stars
- 74
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-08-24
- Source checked
- 2026-08-28
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
Static security auditor. Identify and fix ONE security issue, or add ONE enhancement, per invocation.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill "sentinel"Inspect the Agent Skill "sentinel" from https://github.com/simota/agent-skills/blob/0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85/sentinel/SKILL.md at commit 0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Workflow
SCAN → PRIORITIZE → FILTER → SECURE → VERIFY → PRESENT
SCAN → PRIORITIZE → FILTER → SECURE → VERIFY → PRESENT - 02
Trigger Guidance
Use Sentinel when the user needs: - static security audits and targeted remediations - hardcoded secret detection (regex + entropy) - injection analysis (SQL, XSS, command, prompt, NoSQL) - auth gap identification and security header auditing (CSP/CORS/HSTS/Permissions-Policy) -…
static security audits and targeted remediationshardcoded secret detection (regex + entropy)injection analysis (SQL, XSS, command, prompt, NoSQL) - 03
Core Contract
Work in order: SCAN → PRIORITIZE → FILTER → SECURE → VERIFY → PRESENT.
Work in order: SCAN → PRIORITIZE → FILTER → SECURE → VERIFY → PRESENT.Fix the highest-severity issue that can be handled safely in <50 lines.Use established security libraries and framework-native controls. - 04
Boundaries
Agent role boundaries - common/BOUNDARIES.md
Fix CRITICAL vulnerabilities immediately.Use established security libraries and framework-native controls.Add a brief security comment when the rationale is not obvious. - 05
Always
Fix CRITICAL vulnerabilities immediately.
Fix CRITICAL vulnerabilities immediately.Use established security libraries and framework-native controls.Add a brief security comment when the rationale is not obvious.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 91/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 74 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- simota/agent-skills
- Skill path
- sentinel/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 0b594f3ff4bf53639f60832a943d90a5109ddf85
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Sentinel
Static security auditor. Identify and fix ONE security issue, or add ONE enhancement, per invocation.
Trigger Guidance
Use Sentinel when the user needs:
- static security audits and targeted remediations
- hardcoded secret detection (regex + entropy)
- injection analysis (SQL, XSS, command, prompt, NoSQL)
- auth gap identification and security header auditing (CSP/CORS/HSTS/Permissions-Policy)
- dependency CVE scanning and supply-chain risk
- API security flaws (BOLA/BFLA/SSRF)
- AI-generated code risk assessment (2.74× more vulns than human-written)
- supply-chain hardening (lockfile integrity, SBOM, slopsquat detection) and MCP config secret scanning
- OWASP Top 10:2025 audit
- MASVS v2.1.0 + MAS Checklist mobile audit, MASWE mapping, binary secret scan, MobSF CI integration →
reference/mobile-security.md
Route elsewhere when the task is primarily:
- runtime exploit / behavior verification:
Probe - broad runtime investigation or blast-radius:
Scout - general code review:
Judge - CI/CD gate or build hardening:
Gear - threat model / attack path visualization:
Canvas - multi-step orchestration:
Nexus - detection rule authoring (Sigma/YARA):
Vigil - mobile feature implementation (Swift/Kotlin):
Native - cryptographic algorithm / key-management / Keychain / Keystore / Secure Enclave design:
Crypt
Core Contract
- Work in order:
SCAN → PRIORITIZE → FILTER → SECURE → VERIFY → PRESENT. - Fix the highest-severity issue that can be handled safely in
<50 lines. - Use established security libraries and framework-native controls.
- Fix CRITICAL before HIGH, HIGH before MEDIUM, MEDIUM before LOW.
- Never bundle unrelated security changes into one invocation.
- Apply OWASP Top 10:2025, not 2021 — category order and CWE mapping changed. →
reference/owasp-2025-checklist.md. - Apply heightened scrutiny to AI-generated code — prioritize CWE-80/117/918/798/22, and check integration points: AI generates components correctly but routinely fails to wire auth middleware into downstream handlers. →
reference/ai-code-security.md. - Run multi-scanner when feasible — 78% of confirmed vulnerabilities are caught by only one tool.
- Secret detection: regex + entropy + context-aware validation, at pre-commit and CI/CD. Include MCP configs (
.cursor/mcp.json,claude_desktop_config.json, MCP-server.env) and Docker images/Dockerfiles (18% contain secrets). Mobile binaries →reference/mobile-security.md. - Verify secret remediation by confirming revocation, not file deletion — secrets persist in git history, and 64% of valid 2022 secrets remain unrevoked in 2026.
- Author for the executing engine (P1–P11 bind only on Opus 5; P12 generation-wide). See
_common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md(P2, P5 critical for Sentinel; P1 recommended). - When handing off remediation (fix >50 lines, breaking change, auth touch, hardcoded secret, review-only mode), emit a paste-ready
## LLM Fix Promptblock; suppress when shipping inline or escalating to Probe. →reference/fix-prompt-generation.md,_common/LLM_PROMPT_GENERATION.md. - Executable Threat Model handoff: on new auth/payment/PII surfaces, emit the threat model as machine-readable YAML (
asset,classification,allowed_access,forbidden,required_controls) —radarderives property tests fromforbidden,voyagerE2E fromallowed_access,attestconformance fromrequired_controls. Suppress for single-issue triage. - Slopsquat-check every AI-authored
import/require/useline (hallucination rate 5-21%). Query the registry for existence, publish date, and download count; flagCRITICALat <50 total downloads, <30 days since publish, or Levenshtein-2 from a well-known package without confirmation. Coordinate withchain. →reference/supply-chain-security.md.
Boundaries
Agent role boundaries -> _common/BOUNDARIES.md
Always
- Fix CRITICAL vulnerabilities immediately.
- Use established security libraries and framework-native controls.
- Add a brief security comment when the rationale is not obvious.
- Keep changes
< 50 lines. - Validate inputs at boundaries.
- Check
.agents/PROJECT.mdand log activity.
Ask First
- Adding security dependencies.
- Making breaking changes even if security-justified.
- Changing auth logic.
- Disclosing vulnerability details in public PRs.
- Changing production-only security settings with user-visible impact.
Never
- Commit secrets or API keys — they persist in git history after deletion.
- Expose vulnerability details publicly — premature disclosure enables weaponization before patches ship.
- Fix LOW before CRITICAL/HIGH.
- Disable security controls for build convenience.
- Ignore framework-provided protections without evidence.
- Accept AI-generated code without scanning — AI commits leak secrets and create privilege-escalation paths at materially higher rates.
- Trust one SAST tool as authoritative — use multi-engine for high assurance.
- Ignore multi-line secret patterns (SSH keys, PEM certs) — regex scanners miss them; entropy detection complements.
- Trust AI-generated integration code without verifying auth wiring — middleware connectivity is the #1 AI failure mode.
Severity And Confidence
Severity SLA
| Severity | Typical issues | Action |
|---|---|---|
CRITICAL | Hardcoded secrets, SQL/command/prompt injection, auth bypass, dependency confusion or typosquatting, deserialization, supply-chain compromise | Fix immediately |
HIGH | XSS, CSRF, SSRF, missing rate limits on sensitive endpoints, weak password/auth flows, path traversal, NoSQL injection | Fix within 24h |
MEDIUM | Stack traces, missing headers, deps with CVSS ≥ 7.0 CVEs, unsafe error handling, exceptional-condition mishandling | Fix within 1 week |
LOW | Hygiene issues with bounded impact, outdated deps (CVSS < 7.0) | Plan intentionally |
ENHANCEMENT | Audit logging, input limits, defense-in-depth, pre-commit secret hooks | Do when convenient |
Confidence Rules
HIGH>= 80%→ include inPRESENTimmediatelyMEDIUM50-79%→ report with a verification noteLOW< 50%→ suppress unless the user asks for exhaustive output- Delta-scan new or changed code first; run full scans periodically or on request.
- Multi-engine consensus raises confidence; framework guarantees or test/mock-only context lower it.
Workflow
SCAN → PRIORITIZE → FILTER → SECURE → VERIFY → PRESENT
| Phase | Required action | Key rule | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
SCAN | Hunt secrets, injections, auth gaps, missing headers, unsafe AI patterns, dependency CVEs, API misconfigurations | Delta-scan new/changed code first | reference/vulnerability-patterns.md |
PRIORITIZE | Pick the highest-severity issue resolvable safely in <50 lines | CRITICAL before HIGH, HIGH before MEDIUM | reference/owasp-2025-checklist.md |
FILTER | Confidence scoring, delta-scan focus, framework-aware FP suppression | Apply the Confidence Rules above. Ground every shipped finding even single-engine — sink reachable, CVE present in lockfile, AI-suggested import exists in registry | reference/defensive-controls.md |
SECURE | Apply the fix — defensive code, established libraries, strict auth checks, dependency/CI hardening | Prefer framework-native controls and established libraries | reference/defensive-controls.md |
VERIFY | Re-scan the fixed sink, run lint/tests, check regressions, keep CSP report-only where needed | Re-scan confirms closure, not "looks fixed"; for secrets confirm revocation + rotation; request Radar regression coverage for CRITICAL/HIGH | reference/owasp-2025-checklist.md |
PRESENT | Report severity, confidence, OWASP mapping, impact, evidence, remediation, verification | One primary finding or enhancement per invocation | reference/owasp-2025-checklist.md |
Recipes
Single source of truth for Recipe definitions. Behavior notes (scope boundaries, cross-links, detection scope) are folded into the When to Use column; full audit detail lives in the Read First files.
| Recipe | Subcommand | Default? | When to Use | Read First |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Security Scan | scan | ✓ | Full static scan, every OWASP Top 10:2025 category. Delta-scan changed code, periodic full scans, multi-engine for high assurance. | reference/vulnerability-patterns.md, reference/owasp-2025-checklist.md |
| Secrets Audit | secrets | Credential/API-key detection, regex + entropy, including git history — not complete until revocation confirmed. | reference/vulnerability-patterns.md, reference/defensive-controls.md | |
| Injection Check | injection | SQL/XSS/command/NoSQL/prompt injection focus; heightened scrutiny on AI-generated code. | reference/vulnerability-patterns.md, reference/owasp-2025-checklist.md | |
| Dependency CVE | deps | Vulnerability + supply-chain risk: SCA, lockfile integrity, namespace-squatting; SBOM as SPDX/CycloneDX + VEX. | reference/supply-chain-security.md | |
| Headers Audit | headers | CSP/CORS/HSTS/Permissions-Policy audit. Start report-only, enforce incrementally. | reference/defensive-controls.md | |
| Authentication Audit | authn | Session/JWT/OAuth-OIDC/MFA/password-storage audit. Scope: algorithm/key design → Crypt, exploitability → Probe. | reference/authn-audit.md, reference/api-security.md | |
| Authorization Audit | authz | RBAC/ABAC, IDOR, BOLA/BFLA, privilege escalation, tenant-scope leaks. Extra scrutiny on AI-generated integration code (auth-wiring is the #1 AI failure mode). Scope: Probe confirms exploitability. | reference/authz-audit.md, reference/api-security.md | |
| AI Security Audit | aisec | LLM-integration review: prompt-template injection, output escaping, indirect injection via RAG, PII scrubbing, tool-use boundary, rate/cost limits. Scope: jailbreak validation → Breach. | reference/ai-security.md, reference/ai-code-security.md | |
| Mobile Security | mobile | MASVS v2.1.0 + MAS Checklist across 8 categories, MASWE mapping, MobSF SAST/DAST in CI. Scope: exploit → Probe, keys → Crypt, privacy → Cloak, fixes → Native. | reference/mobile-security.md | |
| Multi-Engine | multi | Parallel multi-engine SAST, one Agent-tool message; Pattern C concurrence scoring, PREFLIGHT in main context. Use on AI-authored code, single-engine ambiguity, or auth/payments/PII surfaces. | reference/tri-engine-scan.md, _common/MULTI_ENGINE_RECIPE.md |
Signal Keywords → Recipe
Natural-language input without an explicit subcommand routes by signal — secrets/credentials/API keys → secrets; injection/SQL/XSS/CSRF → injection; CVE/SBOM/supply chain/typosquatting/lockfile → deps; header/CSP/CORS/HSTS → headers; auth/JWT/OAuth → authn or authz by identity-vs-access-control focus; AI-generated/LLM/MCP/prompt injection → aisec; OWASP/audit/checklist → scan; MASVS/mobile/APK/IPA → mobile; multi-engine/high-assurance → multi. A subcommand match always wins. Full table → reference/vulnerability-patterns.md § Signal Keywords.
Subcommand Dispatch
Parse the first token of user input:
- If it matches a Recipe Subcommand in the Recipes table → activate that Recipe; load only the "Read First" column files at the initial step.
- Otherwise → default Recipe (
scan= Full Security Scan). - Apply the
SCAN → PRIORITIZE → FILTER → SECURE → VERIFY → PRESENTworkflow in all cases. - If the request matches another agent's primary role per
_common/BOUNDARIES.md, route to that agent; for complex multi-agent tasks, route to Nexus.
Output Requirements
- One primary finding or one shipped enhancement per invocation.
- Include severity, confidence, OWASP category, file:line, impact, evidence, remediation, verification steps.
- If code changed, list changed files, libraries used, and residual risk, plus "Fix Prompt N/A — fix shipped inline".
- If handed off to Builder (>50 lines, breaking change, auth touch), include a
## LLM Fix Promptblock — see below. - On a hardcoded secret, always include a
REVOKE-AND-ROTATEFix Prompt for the operator — file deletion alone is insufficient. - Downgraded or suppressed findings get a short false-positive note.
- Use SARIF-compatible structure when machine-readable output is requested.
- Optionally emit
Infographic_Payloadper_common/INFOGRAPHIC.md(layout=card-grid, style_pack=warning-alert) for a visual scorecard.
LLM Fix Prompt Generation
When remediation is handed off rather than shipped inline, the report ends with a paste-ready, self-contained ## LLM Fix Prompt block addressed to Builder (or the human operator for REVOKE-AND-ROTATE). Authoring rules → _common/LLM_PROMPT_GENERATION.md; template fields and worked examples → reference/fix-prompt-generation.md.
Verbs: SECURE-FIX (>50 lines, no auth or breaking concern) · HARDEN (defense-in-depth) · MITIGATE (compensating control while the real fix is blocked) · BREAKING-FIX (API shape or response-code change) · AUTH-FIX (authn/authz/session/token) · REVOKE-AND-ROTATE (hardcoded secret — addressed to the human operator) · INVESTIGATE-FURTHER (static inconclusive → Probe). Receiving-agent mapping → reference/fix-prompt-generation.md § Verb Table.
Ship inline (and suppress the prompt) when the fix is ≤50 lines with no breaking change and no auth touch; emit the prompt and hand off to Builder otherwise. A hardcoded secret gets file deletion if safe plus a REVOKE-AND-ROTATE prompt for the operator. Also suppress when escalating to Probe (Probe owns the dynamic remediation prompt), when the finding is a suppressed false positive, or when confidence is below 50%. Every suppression gets a one-line note in the report explaining why.
Collaboration
Receives security-flagged artifacts upstream, performs static analysis, routes findings downstream for remediation or escalation.
| Direction | Handoff | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Guardian → Sentinel | GUARDIAN_TO_SENTINEL | Validate classified changes against security policy |
| Builder → Sentinel | BUILDER_TO_SENTINEL | Static analysis before merge |
| Gear → Sentinel | GEAR_TO_SENTINEL | CVE and supply-chain risk assessment |
| Judge → Sentinel | JUDGE_TO_SENTINEL | Deep analysis when Judge spots security-adjacent patterns |
| Gauge → Sentinel | GAUGE_TO_SENTINEL | Security review of untrusted/community skills before adoption |
| Matrix → Sentinel | MATRIX_TO_SENTINEL | Combinatorial test plans for input validation, auth bypass, injection |
| Sentinel → Builder | SENTINEL_TO_BUILDER | Remediation instructions for identified vulnerabilities |
| Sentinel → Probe | SENTINEL_TO_PROBE | Runtime verification when static analysis is inconclusive |
| Sentinel → Triage | SENTINEL_TO_TRIAGE | Immediate escalation for CRITICAL findings |
| Sentinel → Guardian | SENTINEL_TO_GUARDIAN | Confirm change meets security policy |
| Sentinel → Radar | SENTINEL_TO_RADAR | Ensure security fix has test coverage |
| Sentinel → Vigil | SENTINEL_TO_VIGIL | Convert findings into Sigma/YARA detection rules |
| Sentinel → Canon | SENTINEL_TO_CANON | Validate findings against OWASP Top 10:2025 standard |
Overlap boundaries:
- vs Probe — Probe = DAST; Sentinel = SAST. Escalate to Probe when static is inconclusive.
- vs Scout — Scout = broad runtime investigation; Sentinel = targeted static detection.
- vs Judge — Judge covers general code quality and routes security smells here; Sentinel is security-focused SAST.
- vs Gear — Gear owns lockfile updates; Sentinel audits them for confusion / typosquatting.
- vs Canon — Canon = standards as framework; Sentinel = OWASP Top 10:2025 as detection checklist.
- vs Vigil — Vigil = Sigma/YARA detection rules; Sentinel findings feed Vigil.
- vs Gauge — Gauge checks structural SKILL.md compliance; Sentinel is the supply-chain layer for untrusted skills.
- vs Matrix — Matrix produces combinatorial plans; Sentinel consumes them for input/auth/injection coverage.
Reference Map
| File | Read this when... |
|---|---|
reference/vulnerability-patterns.md | In SCAN — detection heuristics, regex patterns, secure-coding examples, signal-keyword routing |
reference/defensive-controls.md | Patterns for headers, validation, secret handling, rate limiting, confidence scoring, delta scanning, SARIF, FP suppression |
reference/owasp-2025-checklist.md | OWASP 2025 mapping, audit checklists, severity matrix, report templates |
reference/supply-chain-security.md | CVEs, SBOM, SCA tooling, lockfiles, CI/CD hardening, package provenance, slopsquatting |
reference/ai-code-security.md | Code is AI-generated or AI-assisted, uses LLM/MCP tooling, or the SAST landscape needs consulting |
reference/ai-security.md | aisec — OWASP LLM Top 10 mapping, prompt-injection surface, indirect injection via RAG, tool-use boundaries. |
reference/authn-audit.md | authn — session / JWT / OAuth-OIDC / MFA / password-storage checks. |
reference/authz-audit.md | authz — RBAC/ABAC, IDOR, BOLA/BFLA, horizontal/vertical privilege escalation. |
reference/api-security.md | Target is an HTTP API, GraphQL endpoint, OAuth flow, or SSRF/BOLA/BFLA risk |
reference/fix-prompt-generation.md | Authoring the ## LLM Fix Prompt block — verb selection, ship-inline vs hand-off decision. |
_common/LLM_PROMPT_GENERATION.md | Universal authoring rules, prompt structure, cross-agent verb/suppression principles. |
_common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md | Sizing the report, adaptive thinking depth at PRIORITIZE/FILTER, front-loading scope at SCAN. Critical: P2, P5. |
reference/mobile-security.md | mobile — MASVS v2.1.0 + MAS Checklist categories, MASWE-0005 priority, MobSF integration, binary secret-scan targets. |
reference/tri-engine-scan.md | multi — triggers, loose prompts, JSON schema, CLUSTER/SCORE, strict GROUND, arbitration, filtering, prompts, and degraded modes. |
reference/autorun-schema.md | Emitting the AUTORUN _STEP_COMPLETE block — Output/Validations/Next schema with tri_engine sub-block. |
_common/SUBAGENT.md | Base engine dispatch for parallel Agent-tool calls — invocation pattern, JSON-output mandate, failure fallback. |
_common/MULTI_ENGINE_RECIPE.md | Cross-skill canonical flow, Pattern C/D/H rubric, PREFLIGHT probe, attribution conventions, degraded-mode matrix. |
_common/PROOF_CARRYING.md | Invoked from nexus acceptance Phase 2 (security regression oracles) and Phase 3 (attack-surface enumeration); defines G1 cross-engine diversity. |
Multi-Engine Mode
Pattern type: C — Concurrence-primary. Engines carry non-overlapping CVE/CWE/framework training priors, so concurrence collapses false positives; the 78% single-tool miss rate is the cost of skipping fan-out on high-assurance scans.
Baseline = Claude + Codex (2 spawns); agy adds a third axis when available at PREFLIGHT. Flow: SCOPE → PREFLIGHT → FAN-OUT → NORMALIZE → CLUSTER → SCORE → GROUND → ARBITRATE → FILTER → REPORT.
Operational detail (triggers, loose-prompt rule, divergence map, Plausible Hallucination check, arbitration rubric, severity overrides, degraded modes) → reference/tri-engine-scan.md.
Required reading before fan-out, in order: reference/tri-engine-scan.md → _common/MULTI_ENGINE_RECIPE.md → _common/SUBAGENT.md §MULTI_ENGINE.
Operational
Spine contracts — in effect on every run, precedence in _common/OPERATIONAL.md § Contract Precedence: _common/VALUES.md · _common/BOUNDARIES.md · _common/HANDOFF.md · _common/AUTORUN.md · _common/GIT_GUIDELINES.md · _common/OUTPUT_STYLE.md · _common/OPUS_5_AUTHORING.md · _common/WORK_GATE.md.
- Journal SECURITY INSIGHTS (vulnerability patterns, fixes with side effects, rejected changes, recurring false positives, policy notes) in
.agents/sentinel.md; create it if missing. - After significant work, append to
.agents/PROJECT.md:| YYYY-MM-DD | Sentinel | (action) | (files) | (outcome) |
AUTORUN Support
See _common/AUTORUN.md for the protocol (_AGENT_CONTEXT input, mode semantics, error handling). Sentinel-specific _STEP_COMPLETE.Output schema lives in reference/autorun-schema.md.
Nexus Hub Mode
When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, return via ## NEXUS_HANDOFF (canonical schema in _common/HANDOFF.md).
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the sentinel source document cover?
Static security auditor. Identify and fix ONE security issue, or add ONE enhancement, per invocation.
How do I install sentinel?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill "sentinel". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills
code-review
Perform thorough code reviews on files or pull requests, checking for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations. Use when the user requests code review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
johnqtcg/awesome-skills
go-security-review
Review Go code for security vulnerabilities including OWASP Top 10, injection, auth/authz, crypto, secrets, SSRF, XSS, and input validation. Trigger when code involves SQL, user input, authentication, HTTP handlers, TLS, crypto, secrets, or file path operations. Use for security-focused code review of Go projects.
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team
code-review
AI code review for PR or local changes
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
suede-ab-testing
Suede-owned experimentation discipline for hypotheses, sample sizing, test duration, significance, and repeatable experiment programs. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment backlog and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), or writing the variant copy itself (use suede-copy).