Source profileQuality 86/100

wshobson/agents/plugins/machine-learning-ops/skills/recsys-pipeline-architect/SKILL.md

recsys-pipeline-architect

Design composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines using the six-stage Source→Hydrator→Filter→Scorer→Selector→SideEffect framework popularized by xAI's open-sourced X For You algorithm. Use when building any system that picks "the top K items for a (user, context)" — content feeds, search ranking, RAG rerankers, task prioritizers, notification triage, ad selection.

Source repository stars
39,098
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-08-24
Source checked
2026-08-25

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

A spec-and-scaffold skill for building composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines. Encodes the six-stage pattern popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm (Apache 2.0) and applies it to any "top K for (user, context)" problem.

Best for

  • Building any system that returns "the top K items for a user/context"
  • Designing or refactoring a personalized feed (content, search results, notifications)
  • Wrapping an LLM/ML scorer in proper pipeline plumbing (sources, hydration, filters, side effects)

Not for

  • ❌ Scoring before filtering (wastes compute on candidates that will be dropped)
  • ❌ Synchronous side effects (cache writes / impression emits blocking the response)

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill "plugins/machine-learning-ops/skills/recsys-pipeline-architect"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "recsys-pipeline-architect" from https://github.com/wshobson/agents/blob/d82998e7df393c671ede2387a8435075f0b633f5/plugins/machine-learning-ops/skills/recsys-pipeline-architect/SKILL.md at commit d82998e7df393c671ede2387a8435075f0b633f5. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    The Six-Stage Framework

    Sources before hydration: know what candidates exist before paying to enrich

    Sources before hydration: know what candidates exist before paying to enrichHydration before filtering: many filters need metadata the source didn't provideFiltering before scoring: scoring is the expensive stage — drop the ineligible first
  2. 02

    Workflow When Invoked

    Walk the user through eight steps:

    Clarify the use case (one round, three questions only if missing): items being ranked, input context, language/runtimeIdentify the candidate sources (usually in-network + out-of-network, but single-source also valid)List required hydrations — for each filter and scorer, what data does it need that the source didn't provide?
  3. 03

    When to Use This Skill

    Building any system that returns "the top K items for a user/context"

    Building any system that returns "the top K items for a user/context"Designing or refactoring a personalized feed (content, search results, notifications)Wrapping an LLM/ML scorer in proper pipeline plumbing (sources, hydration, filters, side effects)
  4. 04

    Why this exact order

    Sources before hydration: know what candidates exist before paying to enrich

    Sources before hydration: know what candidates exist before paying to enrichHydration before filtering: many filters need metadata the source didn't provideFiltering before scoring: scoring is the expensive stage — drop the ineligible first
  5. 05

    Key Trade-offs to Surface

    Never default silently on these — they are product decisions disguised as technical ones.

    Single score: train one model to predict relevance. To change behavior → retrain.Multi-action: predict P(action) for many actions (P(read), P(like), P(share), P(skip), P(report)), combine with weights at serving time. To change behavior → change weights. No retraining.Isolated: each candidate scored independently. Deterministic, cacheable.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Network access

medium · line 73

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

**Request-time (online):** pipeline runs on each request. Latency budget: 100–300ms.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score86/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars39,098SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
wshobson/agents
Skill path
plugins/machine-learning-ops/skills/recsys-pipeline-architect/SKILL.md
Commit
d82998e7df393c671ede2387a8435075f0b633f5
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-25
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Recsys Pipeline Architect

A spec-and-scaffold skill for building composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines. Encodes the six-stage pattern popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm (Apache 2.0) and applies it to any "top K for (user, context)" problem.

Overview

Most "recommendation systems" in production aren't exotic ML — they're pipelines: fetch candidates from one or more sources, enrich them with metadata, drop the ineligible, score the rest, sort and pick the top K, then fire async side effects. The pattern is universal. The scoring function and the items change; the pipeline shape doesn't.

This skill is an independent reimplementation of the pattern (MIT) — no code copied from the original.

When to Use This Skill

  • Building any system that returns "the top K items for a user/context"
  • Designing or refactoring a personalized feed (content, search results, notifications)
  • Wrapping an LLM/ML scorer in proper pipeline plumbing (sources, hydration, filters, side effects)
  • Adding multi-action prediction with tunable weights (instead of a single relevance score)
  • Building a RAG retrieval reranker (cheap retrieval → expensive rerank)
  • Designing a task prioritizer or alert triage system

The Six-Stage Framework

#StageJobParallel?
1SourceFetch candidates from one or more originsYes — multiple sources run in parallel
2HydratorEnrich candidates with metadata needed for filtering and scoringYes — independent hydrators run in parallel
3FilterDrop ineligible candidates (blocked, expired, duplicate, ineligible)Sequential — each filter sees fewer items
4ScorerAssign each surviving candidate one or more scoresSequential — later scorers see earlier scores
5SelectorSort by final score, return top KSingle op
6SideEffectCache, log, emit events, update served-historyAsync — must never block the response

Why this exact order

  • Sources before hydration: know what candidates exist before paying to enrich
  • Hydration before filtering: many filters need metadata the source didn't provide
  • Filtering before scoring: scoring is the expensive stage — drop the ineligible first
  • Scorer chain (not single scorer): real systems compose ML scoring + diversity reranking + business rules
  • Selector after scoring: keeps scoring deterministic and cacheable
  • SideEffects last and async: side effects must never block the user response

Workflow When Invoked

Walk the user through eight steps:

  1. Clarify the use case (one round, three questions only if missing): items being ranked, input context, language/runtime
  2. Identify the candidate sources (usually in-network + out-of-network, but single-source also valid)
  3. List required hydrations — for each filter and scorer, what data does it need that the source didn't provide?
  4. List the filters — cheap before expensive, universal before user-specific (duplicate, self, age, block/mute, previously-served, eligibility)
  5. Design the scorer chain — primary ML/heuristic → combiner (multi-action with weights) → diversity → business rules
  6. Selector — sort descending by final score, take top K (or stratified mix)
  7. SideEffects — cache served IDs, emit impression events, update counters, log analytics; all fire-and-forget
  8. Generate the scaffold in the user's stack

Key Trade-offs to Surface

Never default silently on these — they are product decisions disguised as technical ones.

1. Single score vs multi-action prediction

  • Single score: train one model to predict relevance. To change behavior → retrain.
  • Multi-action: predict P(action) for many actions (P(read), P(like), P(share), P(skip), P(report)), combine with weights at serving time. To change behavior → change weights. No retraining.

The X For You algorithm uses multi-action with both positive and negative weights. Recommend multi-action when the user expects to tune frequently.

2. Candidate isolation vs joint scoring

  • Isolated: each candidate scored independently. Deterministic, cacheable.
  • Joint: candidates attend to each other during scoring (e.g., transformer over the whole batch). More expressive but non-deterministic across batches.

Default to isolation. Joint only when there's a specific reason (e.g., explicit batch-aware diversity).

3. Online vs offline batch

  • Request-time (online): pipeline runs on each request. Latency budget: 100–300ms.
  • Pre-computed (offline batch): pipeline runs periodically, results cached. Lower latency, lower freshness.
  • Hybrid: candidate retrieval offline, ranking online.

Hard Rules

  1. Do not invent benchmark numbers. "How fast is this?" → "depends on workload, run it yourself."
  2. Attribution discipline. Attribute the pattern as "popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm" / github.com/xai-org/x-algorithm (Apache 2.0).
  3. No trademark use. Don't name the user's artifact "X-like" or use "For You" branding. Use neutral names: "candidate pipeline", "feed pipeline", "ranking pipeline".
  4. Surface trade-offs. Multi-action vs single, isolation vs joint, online vs offline — never default silently.
  5. The generated scaffold must run. No pseudocode passing as code.
  6. Filter order matters. Cheap before expensive. Universal before user-specific.
  7. Side effects never block. Wrap in fire-and-forget patterns (goroutines / promises without await / asyncio tasks).

Anti-Patterns

  • ❌ Scoring before filtering (wastes compute on candidates that will be dropped)
  • ❌ Synchronous side effects (cache writes / impression emits blocking the response)
  • ❌ A single "relevance" score when the product needs multi-objective tuning
  • ❌ Joint scoring as default (non-deterministic, uncacheable, doesn't compose with reranking)
  • ❌ Pseudocode "for illustration" — the scaffold must actually run

Common Use Cases

Content feed (Strapi v5 plugin, TypeScript)

User has a CMS with 50k articles, wants a personalized "for you" feed. Walk through 8 steps → generate a Strapi plugin scaffold with multi-action scoring, author diversity, standard filters, async side-effect lane.

RAG retrieval reranker (Python async)

User's RAG returns top-50 chunks from a vector DB, wants to rerank with a more expensive scorer and return top-5. Single-source pipeline with a scorer chain (cheap retrieval + expensive rerank).

Task prioritizer (FastAPI service)

User has a queue of incoming task suggestions, wants to rank by "what should this user work on next" considering their past patterns. Items reversed (tasks instead of content), same shape applies.

Notification triage (offline-batch job)

User wants a daily digest that picks the top 10 from the last 24h queue. Offline-batch pipeline. Source = queue, filters = age/dedup/eligibility, scorer = urgency × user-affinity, selector = top 10, side effect = email send (still async).

Upstream

This skill is a single-file adapter for the upstream repository, which ships 5 load-on-demand reference docs and 3 runnable example scaffolds (Strapi v5 / Go / Python — every one green on its test suite, 9/9 tests total).

  • Upstream: https://github.com/mturac/recsys-pipeline-architect
  • Release: v0.1.0 (MIT)
  • References: interfaces in 4 languages (TS/Go/Python/Rust), multi-action scoring, candidate isolation, filter cookbook (12 patterns), scorer cookbook
  • Cross-platform install: npx skills add mturac/recsys-pipeline-architect

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the recsys-pipeline-architect source document cover?

A spec-and-scaffold skill for building composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines. Encodes the six-stage pattern popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm (Apache 2.0) and applies it to any "top K for (user, context)" problem.

How do I install recsys-pipeline-architect?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill "plugins/machine-learning-ops/skills/recsys-pipeline-architect". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which permission-related actions were detected?

Static rules flagged network in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 10014,671

prowler-cloud/prowler

postgresql-indexing

PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance

Computed 100147

oaustegard/claude-skills

featuring

Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre

Computed 9931,651

HKUDS/Vibe-Trading

strategy-generate

Create, modify, and optimize quantitative trading strategies, then backtest and evaluate them.

Computed 9980

vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public

qa-testing-ios

Guides iOS testing with XCTest, XCUITest, Swift Testing, simctl, and xcresult. Use when choosing destinations, controlling flakes, or parsing test artifacts for native apps.